Bill DeShivs
New member
In the 1970s I worked at an indoor range. I also carried a NAA .22 short in my pocket-hence I did a lot of testing and shooting with it. We shot a Second Chance vest with. 22 short up through .41 magnum. The short penetrated as well as the .41 and came close to going through the vest.
You people who suggest that the .22 short is not a serious weapon are totally incorrect. Some of the remarks border on insane! A towel! Almost ANY handgun round can fail to penetrate a human skull.
The short wouldn't have been around for 150 years if it didn't work. It seems to develop energy better from ultra short barrels than the long rifle.
High velocity shorts have about the same muzzle velocity as HV .22lr from most barrels-they just have a lighter bullet.
The gallery loads and reduced power "quiet" short loads may be the reason you uninformed people think the short is a toy. I can asure you it is not.
To think the short won't penetrate muscle is ridiculous!
Isn't it interesting that a neophyte can takehis inexperience and decide that a round that has been working for 150 years doesn't work?
You people who suggest that the .22 short is not a serious weapon are totally incorrect. Some of the remarks border on insane! A towel! Almost ANY handgun round can fail to penetrate a human skull.
The short wouldn't have been around for 150 years if it didn't work. It seems to develop energy better from ultra short barrels than the long rifle.
High velocity shorts have about the same muzzle velocity as HV .22lr from most barrels-they just have a lighter bullet.
The gallery loads and reduced power "quiet" short loads may be the reason you uninformed people think the short is a toy. I can asure you it is not.
To think the short won't penetrate muscle is ridiculous!
Isn't it interesting that a neophyte can takehis inexperience and decide that a round that has been working for 150 years doesn't work?