InigoMontoya
New member
Their biggest mistake was using a bomb range as an artillery range. The safety requirements of those to activities are very different.
As an aside... I've no idea how it works for municipally owned/operated ranges, but had they done this on a federal range what they did is actually criminal. In the federal game, for each energetics firing range there is what is called a "siting document." That document determines what activities are allowed to be performed on that site. If the document doesn't mention cannons, then it is quite literally illegal to operate cannons within that facility. Given that we're dealing with a police bomb range, I highly doubt that cannons are mentioned. Mind you, there's no reason to believe that a municipally owned/operated range operates under the same statutes, I merely bring it up to point out that such wrecklessness is already taken into account at the federal level.
And yes, they were wreckless.
As an aside... I've no idea how it works for municipally owned/operated ranges, but had they done this on a federal range what they did is actually criminal. In the federal game, for each energetics firing range there is what is called a "siting document." That document determines what activities are allowed to be performed on that site. If the document doesn't mention cannons, then it is quite literally illegal to operate cannons within that facility. Given that we're dealing with a police bomb range, I highly doubt that cannons are mentioned. Mind you, there's no reason to believe that a municipally owned/operated range operates under the same statutes, I merely bring it up to point out that such wrecklessness is already taken into account at the federal level.
And yes, they were wreckless.