Chesster wrote:
Nice outcome Bill. I had a similar project piece long gone now based on a very rough $100 Brazilian. And similarly, the smith had a shop accident and gouged the cut bbl stub. He did a porting on the bbl to cover the blunder. Manufactured a ramp sight for the bbl and reblued her. Made a nice truck piece.
Again, congrats. PS. It begs for a custom Tom Threepersons.
Thanks Chesster. I'd luv to have a Tom Threepersons holster for it. But other priorities right now at the moment, and I have a few holsters for my 1917's already. (Although none as nice as a Tom Threepersons holster). I have a short N frame, spring loaded, shoulder holster that's perfect for my 1917 snubby, but it needs shoulder harness repair before I can use it again. And I have two other short waist holsters that I normally use for my Uberti .45 colts that also fit my long and short barrel S&W 1917's. So I can get by for awhile, but you are right, a Tom threepersons holster sure would be nice.
Here's a double shoulder holster rig I created to hold two of my S&W 1917's by using two 1917 holster reproductions, and using parts from two Sam Browne belts. The waist rig is my double 1912 holster rig for my parkerized auto ordinance and my stainless hi cap para ordnance. All .45 acp's of course.
Hawkeye wrote:
Nice work.
Thanks Hawkeye.
Skoro wrote:
That's a fine looking 1917. Good work.
Thanks Skoro.
Mike Irwin wrote:
That's an impressive welding job on the barrel.
My main concern is, though, that with cuts that deep and the amount of heat you've flushed into the barrel along its entire length you may have weakened it significantly.
Thanks Mike. The cuts were deep on the barrel but not even quite halfway through it and while it was being welded, to keep the heat down, a compressed air hose was blowing on it AFTER doing each and every individual weld on each cut. Did it weaken the barrel in any way? I don't know but I'm sure it wasn't particularly good for it. But I had no choice. I'll find out when I shoot it next and post a report here on how it does. I don't think I'll have a problem with the barrel though. I don't shoot plus p's in any of my old 1917's and with the relatively low pressure and velocities of the .45 acp, I think I'll be okay. I will wear a heavy pair of welding gloves, my kevlar helmet and and kevlar vest plus safety glasses the first few cylinders of rounds I put through it next, just to be on the safe side.
jrothWA wrote:
Should have used analuminum rod.
inside the bore to draw heat away faster, with the compressed air on that.
Do you have access to a testing lab that can do a hardness test, either Brinnell or Rockwell A, test some other ares of the top strap and lower crane/frame ares and then the welded areas and compare.
You MAYBE safe but try and confirm.
Nicely done tho!
Thanks. Glad you liked it. But I haven't heard of that particular kind of metal. What is an "anal-uminum" or "analuminum" rod? Is that some kind of new type of metal mined from someplace very dark?
. Unfortunately I don't have access to a testing lab that could do a harness test. Only my shop and my backyard acreage and the squirrels out back aren't much help scientifically. No doubt I could take it to a jeweler or someone who could do a hardness test, but no matter what the hardness results showed, I am still going to shoot it, so why bother? As I told Mike, the cuts didn't go even halfway through the barrel and with the relatively low pressures of a standard loading .45 acp, I think I'll be okay. Our forefathers shot black powder barrels that were iron, not steel and not even particularly heat treated, or at least unevenly heat treated, and they did okay. I realize that was lower pressure black powder loads, but a factory load .45 acp isn't that hot of a load even by black powder standards. But I will wear hand, head, body and eye protection when I shoot the first few cylinders through it, just to be on the safe side. I'm fairly confident I won't have any problems, but I will take safety precautions when shooting it for the first time. I'll post again to show the results of when I shoot it.
Malamute wrote:
Have you tried any blueing on the nickel weld?
I took some Winchester parts in for repair, the end cap for the magazine had some goon twist the screw slot out (no reason to ever put a screwdriver in it, it isnt threaded). The helpful guy at the welding shop did me a big favor and used a really strong nickel welding rod to strengthen the repair on the end cap. The nickel weld wont blue. The cap is now "fixed", but unusable."
No I haven't tried any bluing on the weld or any other part of the revolver Malamute. Because I don't intend to blue it. It will either stay highly polished and "in the white" or be nickel plated.
Dave T wrote:
I don't fancy the high polish finish but it's your gun and you seem to favor it, so more power to you. I have one of these but the barrel is 3-3/8". I would prefer the honest 3-1/2" you have. Apples and oranges I guess. (smile).
Dave, originally I was just polishing out the pits and rust with an eye towards getting rid of them, but there was so much of it, that it necessitated me polishing out the entire revolver to get rid of them all. As I buffed along and the beauty of the polished bare carbon steel metal came out, I decided I really liked the looks of it like that. If I ever did want to get it re-blued (which I don't and won't), highly polishing out the metal like that would only give me a superior surface under the re-blue and make it look better. I have four S&W 1917's now. A blue 1917 commercial model, a matte nickel 1917, this snubby 1917 in the white, and a 1917 that is highly polished nickel with gold plated cylinder, hammer, trigger, lanyard ring, ejector rod and cylinder release, and I have to admit I do like the highly polished nickel finishes the best. Just a personal preference. I'm the same way with my black powder revolvers. I sold all my other black powder revolvers and just kept two Pietta 1860 .44's that are nickel plated and came with gold triggers, hammers and cylinders and faux ivory grips. But I bought stainless steel cylinders for each of them and polished those out to match the nickel plating. I hate rust and no doubt that's part of the reason I like nickel plated (or stainless) guns, because no matter what, eventually a blued gun will rust (or patina to brown) much quicker than a nickel plated one will. And I can't get a black powder 1860 in stainless nor a S&W 1917 in stainless, so I have to settle for nickel plated. Plus the nickel or stainless cleans up easier and you don't have to worry about keeping it dry in an outing as much. Plus I just like the high polish nickel esthetically. Must have a little "New Orleans pimp" in me Lol. Just "ma thang" I guess.
.