Double Naught Spy
New member
Keg, I take it that you didn't know that prior to the 1800s, domestic hogs introduced into the US came from Europe and the hog ancestrous to the domestic hog in Europe was the European Wild Boar or "Russian" boar.
So your "Russian" boar has the same DNA as the domestic counterpart. The phenotypic expression of traits to which you refer are traits typical successive generations of non-captive hogs adapting to the environment. If you don't understand the process, look up Peppered Moth.
So your "Russian influence" hogs are not distinguishable from domestic hogs that have had successive generations outside of captivity in the wild.
Perfect. I am afraid you copied off the wrong person's exam. The tooth you claim that shows the hog to be a hybrid is the fabled and bogus Euro tooth that is claimed to be diagnostic of a domestic/"Russian" hybrid. The person that came up with this as being indicative of a hybrid definitely did not know about hog dentition. Here is the description. Pan down to"How Old is That Pig?" ....
http://www.hunting-in-texas.com/learnhogs.htm
and see here...
http://www.texasboars.com/articles/aging.html
I have seen this before and I have to laugh. That is a vestigial LPM1 (lower first premolar, adult tooth)!!!! In no way does it have anything to do with being domesticated or wild.
I have yet to see anything in my veterinary or osteology texts that support that crossing domestic or feral hogs and Russian boars produces this vestigial tooth, especially when it is a tooth that shows up in both domestic and "Russian" hogs!!!!!!
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...,s:0http://www.skullsite.co.uk/Pig/pigdom.htm
In fact, that Euro tooth that is supposedly diagnostic of the hybrid shows up as part of the typical dental formula for hogs which is
3 1 4 3
______
3 1 4 3
This formula is the same for domestic or your "Russian" hogs.
http://www.skullsite.co.uk/Pig/wboar.htm
http://www.jstor.org/pss/3798365
http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/htm/bc/digzz06.htm
Why is it a vestigial? It is something of a remnant tooth. Many other artiodactyls have all but totally lost the tooth, but it still shows up in regularly in Suidae (pig family). Rarely, you will find a white-tailed deer with one or two vestigial LPM1s as something of a throwback.
Do the vestigial LPM1s always show up in domestic pigs? Nope. They are vestigial. Sometimes they are not there or when they are there they are smaller than their other PM counterparts, less well formed. They are a tooth being evolutionarily lost.
I really have to wonder how it is that folks come up with this stuff and pass it off as being some sort of diagnostic fact. When they do, however, it shows a deficiency in understanding of the topic.
Go look up pictures of domestic pigs on the internet and teeth like I showed you above and you will see that non-feral domestic pigs have this tooth with remarkable regularity.
So your "Russian" boar has the same DNA as the domestic counterpart. The phenotypic expression of traits to which you refer are traits typical successive generations of non-captive hogs adapting to the environment. If you don't understand the process, look up Peppered Moth.
So your "Russian influence" hogs are not distinguishable from domestic hogs that have had successive generations outside of captivity in the wild.
Example of pig with Eurasian(Russian influence)......U don't see a difference???
Also...the tooth that shows it is a hybrid........
Hog school is over..........hahaaaaa
Perfect. I am afraid you copied off the wrong person's exam. The tooth you claim that shows the hog to be a hybrid is the fabled and bogus Euro tooth that is claimed to be diagnostic of a domestic/"Russian" hybrid. The person that came up with this as being indicative of a hybrid definitely did not know about hog dentition. Here is the description. Pan down to"How Old is That Pig?" ....
http://www.hunting-in-texas.com/learnhogs.htm
and see here...
http://www.texasboars.com/articles/aging.html
I have seen this before and I have to laugh. That is a vestigial LPM1 (lower first premolar, adult tooth)!!!! In no way does it have anything to do with being domesticated or wild.
I have yet to see anything in my veterinary or osteology texts that support that crossing domestic or feral hogs and Russian boars produces this vestigial tooth, especially when it is a tooth that shows up in both domestic and "Russian" hogs!!!!!!
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...,s:0http://www.skullsite.co.uk/Pig/pigdom.htm
In fact, that Euro tooth that is supposedly diagnostic of the hybrid shows up as part of the typical dental formula for hogs which is
3 1 4 3
______
3 1 4 3
This formula is the same for domestic or your "Russian" hogs.
http://www.skullsite.co.uk/Pig/wboar.htm
http://www.jstor.org/pss/3798365
http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/htm/bc/digzz06.htm
Why is it a vestigial? It is something of a remnant tooth. Many other artiodactyls have all but totally lost the tooth, but it still shows up in regularly in Suidae (pig family). Rarely, you will find a white-tailed deer with one or two vestigial LPM1s as something of a throwback.
Do the vestigial LPM1s always show up in domestic pigs? Nope. They are vestigial. Sometimes they are not there or when they are there they are smaller than their other PM counterparts, less well formed. They are a tooth being evolutionarily lost.
I really have to wonder how it is that folks come up with this stuff and pass it off as being some sort of diagnostic fact. When they do, however, it shows a deficiency in understanding of the topic.
Go look up pictures of domestic pigs on the internet and teeth like I showed you above and you will see that non-feral domestic pigs have this tooth with remarkable regularity.