MP Bodyguard vs Glock 42 (.380 caliber)

J

johnelmore

New member
The wild world of firearms! One day the 9mm is the rage than thats too small and the next day its .40 or .45. Now we are back to the 380...getting smaller I see!

Well, Ive always been into the 380. Its so carry friendly. Ive never been into Glock. The MP Bodyguard is my choice. Very carry friendly, fun to shoot and it has a real safety unlike Glock which has trigger safety. As long as you dont pull the trigger on the Glock you are fine...I have never accepted that contention simply because sometimes you have those dumb moments and pull the trigger when not intended. We all like to think we are above the unintended trigger, but it happens to the best of us and only thing which will save you is a real traditional safety.

The MP Bodyguard is true to its name. It seems like it was designed for a bodyguard. Can be slipped into a suit pocket ready to go. Slimmer and smaller than Glock. The Glock seems more like a mini Glock whereas the MP is purpose built.

The slim Bodyguard is my tool of choice. How does anyone carry the super expensive Wilson Carry Pistol? I have no idea. My 379 dollar Bodyguard is great for the task.
 
We all like to think we are above the unintended trigger, but it happens to the best of us and only thing which will save you is a real traditional safety.
Click to expand...
When the gun is drawn and in your hand, the safety is off, so its sort of a moot point.

Not taking that safety off on the draw is what will get you killed. Having to even think about the safety even more so.

I have a couple of 42's. Great pistols and they do work and shoot, just like their larger siblings. Most of the smaller versions of bigger guns, and "little" guns in general, dont handle and/or shoot like the bigger versions.

As much as I like the 42's, they showed me they wont replace my 26s. Im not even bothering with the 43's.
 
unlike Glock which has trigger safety.
Click to expand...

Glocks don't have a safety on the trigger, they have no safety at all, much like a revolver. The blade on a Glocks trigger is there to prevent the forces of inertia from pulling the trigger if the gun is dropped and lands in just the right position. A Glock is no more dangerous to carry than a DOA revolver with a good trigger. There is almost as much take up and Glocks can be had with either a 5.5 lb trigger or an 8 lb trigger.

I carry a Kel-Tec P-3AT when I need something really small, had a G19 and G26 for years. I skipped the G42 since I had the Kel-Tec and did buy the G43. It is enough thinner that it has replaced the G26.
 
Small pistols are meant to be put in small places. It seems a bit laughable to see someone sporting a traditional holster with a small pistol.

Glocks work well with traditional holsters and they were meant to be open carried like a uniformed officer or soldier carries theirs. However the small pistol is carried in tight places thus the traditional safety is better suited. When you draw the pistol from that small place best to have that safety.
 
I carry my 26's in a Smart Carry and on occasion, an ankle holster. Same places I used to carry my Seecamps, LCP's ect.

Ive always carried my full size Glocks (and most other things) in a IWB type holster.

Safety has never been an issue with any of them.
 
The only difference between a Glock 42 in your pocket and a 642 is the trigger pull. Under stress, you are likely to pull either trigger on a pocket draw.

How many times do you practice the pocket draw and flipping off the safety of the Bodyguard?

Under stress, you may not - unless very well practiced.
 
I am glad that you are happy with your Bodyguard.

Lots of people have carried Glocks for a long time with no accidents, and lots of people work thumb safeties pretty reliably. Personally, I am glad we have lots of choices available so that folks can pick what works for them.
 
I switch between carrying a 1911 full size colt, a Glock 21 and a Glock 30 with no problems. I practice with all three. My personal preference for carry is the Glock 30. I use both types of holsters iWeb and own depending on what I am wearing and where I am going.
 
To be honest, I leave the safety off on my bodyguard. No need to over complicate things if the time comes I need it. That being said I'd like to get a 1911 at some point and I'll definitely get that safety swipe down to unconscious action....hopefully.
 
The 1911 has the best safety system in the world. If someone takes your 1911 or lets say some kids manage to get your 1911 they will have to figure it out. Try renting a 1911 at a range and pick it up to see if you can work it without instruction. It will take at least a little time for some folks and for others they might be asking around the range how to work it or just give up entirely.

The only issue is the bulk of the 1911. The .45 caliber was not designed to be concealed and comfortable.
 
Had a Bodyguard .380 and I really liked it. With that said, I think if I were to get a pocket gun again I would save a $100 and buy an LCP. In reference to safeties, for me they belong on SA autos and long guns, thats it.
 
I've had my BG380 for maybe 5 years now. So, it's not the current MP version. No failures at all except for the laser conking out. S&W fixed it for free. (Didn't send the whole gun to them; just the laser.)

I never use the safety. It's very small to keep the gun so narrow, so it doesn't hurt anything for it to be there, but I wouldn't want to try to work it under stress.
 
If the Bodyguard, external safety and .380 caliber makes you happy, and most importantly, makes you carry a gun, good for you.
I have been carrying Glocks in 9mm and .45 acp for years with no issues.
 
Despite Glocks website which states 5.5 lbs, the Glock and MP have the same trigger pull...about 8 to 10 lbs.
Click to expand...

The Glock and the M&P/Shield might have similar trigger pulls. The Glock 42 and the Bodyguard are in entirely different worlds trigger pull wise.
 
......I have never accepted that contention simply because sometimes you have those dumb moments and pull the trigger when not intended. We all like to think we are above the unintended trigger, but it happens to the best of us and only thing which will save you is a real traditional safety.....

No offense.....but if unintended trigger pulls are a problem, more training is in order....

As far as the BG380 and G42 are involved, I think size is a big issue in terms of the hand of the person using the weapon. I had a BG380 and to me it was horrendous. My hands are big and I had a hell of a time with the trigger. As stated, the pull felt like 50lbs. I switched to a G43 and for my large hands, it was the best thing I have done.

It's all in the shooter and what he/she can shoot comfortably and accurately. Especially when it comes to a carry weapon.
 
Between the two, the Glock is the much better gun. I can't see anywhere the Bodyguard wins other than that it is slightly smaller in the event that the tiniest gun needed is possible.

The Glock has a better trigger pull, much better sights, easier slide, and less felt recoil.

Haven't owned either but I have rented both and shot them side by side. No chance I would go with the Bodyguard if I had a chance between the two - unless for some odd reason the smaller size was absolutely necessary.
 
I have a BG... its smaller size being the main reason I wanted it over a 42.

Also managed to land it on a good sale. It is the safety free version, and is also the M&P version that does not have a built in laser, further shrinking the package.


I think the glock is a bit easier to shoot well, better trigger and all that. It is just bigger, and harder to pocket carry. For me ease of draw is important on a pocket pistol. Use of a proper pocket holster is a must as well.


And as was said, when you draw a pistol in the event it is needed, or may be needed, the safety comes off on the draw. If no shot is needed right away, do to a changing circumstance, the finger is off the trigger.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top