A general question. Is it better to spend money on more guns or more ammo?
We all know the adage: a gun without ammo is no good. So I ask, should I devote my discretionary spending on acquiring more guns or more ammo?
My current philosophy favors the latter rather than the former. I tend to think I need only one gun for each purpose, and I feel more secure knowing I have plenty of ammo. More ammo means not only more security but more training and more practice.
PS -- my one gun for each purpose philosphy doesn't mean I should only own one gun, nor that I should own only one gun of each type. It only means that every gun I own or intend to own should serve a specific purpose, without duplicates.
If I have duplicate guns, I'd rather have ammo instead. Am I wrong?
Thoughts, tips, and opinions welcome.
We all know the adage: a gun without ammo is no good. So I ask, should I devote my discretionary spending on acquiring more guns or more ammo?
My current philosophy favors the latter rather than the former. I tend to think I need only one gun for each purpose, and I feel more secure knowing I have plenty of ammo. More ammo means not only more security but more training and more practice.
PS -- my one gun for each purpose philosphy doesn't mean I should only own one gun, nor that I should own only one gun of each type. It only means that every gun I own or intend to own should serve a specific purpose, without duplicates.
If I have duplicate guns, I'd rather have ammo instead. Am I wrong?
Thoughts, tips, and opinions welcome.