What is the standard for a "decent service trigger?" What exactly is a "service trigger," anyhow? What about the shooter having been in IDPA? Couldn't the proverbial "overzealous prosecutor" use that against you? What about the use of +p ammo? Same legal theory? What about taking courses from guys like Ayoob? Couldn't that be used against you? What about being a member of the NRA? I guess that prosecutor would jump all over that? What about the number of times you've visited shooting ranges? Couldn't that be used against you?
I'll take my chances with carrying a G26 with a 3.5# connector and polished innards. If I need some legal advice, I really do get it from real lawyers. Have a lot of friends who are Superior Court Judges and District Attorneys. They're always happy to give me advice on matters like this.
The fact is, if I have to use a firearm in a case of s.d. in my local jurisdiction, I really don't believe I'll have any legal problems, whether I shoot behind my back, aiming with a mirror, or have an 8oz trigger on my firearm. On-the-other-hand, if the same event happened in an urban area, then I'd have to employ the best lawyer I could find.
So far, so good. No s.d. events in my life. I carry daily. I don't look for trouble. However, "things" are getting worse and worse by the day. Wouldn't surprise me at all to see some kind of major general insurrection in response, for example, to an outcome in the Zimmerman case that's contrary to the folks who are threatening violence, riots, etc.
I would truly like to see any cases that hinged primarily on the use of a modified weapon in an otherwise legitimate case of s.d. If anybody could provide such information, I'd certainly appreciate it. I don't think such a case exists, but I've certainly been wrong before!