Million Mom March stands accused of assaulting a champion of the Second Amendment

robnoel

New member
New gun, laws by force

by Wayne Laugesen (letters@boulderweekly.com)

Just five months after anti-gunner Robert Howell was videotaped pursuing and beating a pro-gun activist in Boulder, another member of the Million Mom March stands accused of assaulting a champion of the Second Amendment.

Up in Fort Collins, Cherie Trine is waiting for the knock on her door. Detective Neil Hisam of the Fort Collins Police Department told her this week she will likely be charged with assaulting a pro-gun activist who crashed a Million Mom March meeting Aug. 15 at the Plymouth Congregational Church.
"I don't know why the police are pursuing this," says Trine, a 41-year-old day care provider. "I guess the police favor the biggest bullies in these cases."

Rita Davis, spokeswoman for the Fort Collins Police Department, says it's true that Trine may be charged with assaulting gun rights activist George Keifer. Her department has received five sworn affidavits from witnesses who say Trine struck Keifer with a clipboard, causing him a minor facial injury.

"You know, I'm 5' 1", 105 pounds," says Trine. "These are very scary people. They're mostly great big men, and many of them are somewhat fat. They act like bullies and they yell nasty things. Yet they're standing there yelling to the police Ôassault, assault.' These are bad people."

The bad people comprise a grassroots organization of Second Amendment activists known as the Tyranny Response Team. They're people who believe new gun control measures will create a slippery slope toward gun confiscation, which would nullify the constitutional provision for an armed citizenry.

The loosely-organized activists stage peaceful protests several times a week, picketing politicians, meetings and any events they believe to have an anti-Second Amendment aim.

So, when pro-gun activists saw an ad in the Fort Collins Coloradoan publicizing a meeting of the Million Mom March, they decided to show up. About 50 arrived at the church with signs, literature and a bullhorn for an outside demonstration. Just before the meeting began inside, several of the pro-gunners decided to attend. The meeting featured a speech by Tom Mauser, whose son was killed in the Columbine massacre. Mauser gets paid $72,000 a year by SAFE Colorado, an anti-gun group, to give anti-gun lectures.


Go away

At the door to the meeting, a man was waiting for the gun rights activists. He told them they weren't welcome.

"He asked if we were with the Million Mom March, and we said Ôno.' He said we couldn't come in," recalls 30-year-old Drew Wright, of Longmont. "I told him I read about it in the newspaper, and that the ad led me to believe it was open to the public."

Wright and others at the door insisted they be allowed in. The guard held his ground, and called police after a pro-gunner took his picture. The police showed up and asked the pro-gunners to please be on their way.
"One officer said ÔWe'd appreciate if you not go inside.' Duncan Philp (a Response Team activist) told him it was advertised as a public meeting," says Bob Glass, a gun store owner and member of the Tyranny Response Team. "The officer said he couldn't do anything legally to stop us from attending the meeting, but that he'd Ôlike it' if we would leave. I told him I could appreciate what he would Ôlike' us to do, but that we were going in nevertheless."

It's understandable why the pro-gunners would want to attend. The Million Mom March organization had advertised this meeting so it could start a chapter in Fort Collins to work on new gun control laws. So anyone concerned about gun laws, who thinks they're un-American and dangerous, would naturally be interested in knowing what the opposition is up to.
And why would advocates of gun laws wish to work in secret? Isn't our legal system based on open dialogue, the sharing of ideas, and the ability to reasonably disagree and compromise? Isn't this what keeps us from shooting each other?

Apparently not in the minds of these gun control advocates in Fort Collins. They wanted a meeting of like-minds only. Meaning they'd like to push through new laws in a stealth manner, void of meaningful discourse. Thankfully, the police knew better than to forcefully exclude activists from a meeting because of their political and philosophical views. So, against their own desire, the police allowed the pro-gun activists to enter.

"About 12 of us walked in so we could sit down and listen to the meeting," says Glass. "And this woman starts screaming at us ÔWe need your names. You have to sign in.' One of our men was videotaping, and the woman who was screaming took a clipboard and smashed it into the video camera, which he was holding up to his eye. The video camera was pushed into his eye causing a minor injury."
Fort Collins police aren't saying much, other than that they may charge Trine with assault. They won't release the police report, saying the case remains under investigation.

Hate mongers

Trine, of course, has a different version of the story than the five witnesses who submitted sworn statements. She explains why she was angry that pro-gunners came to the meeting. "It doesn't make sense to have a planning meeting and let the enemy in," says Trine. "We have suffered tremendous harassment from this group. Like I said, they're very scary people." "What harassment?" I asked.

"They show up at our meetings with signs and bullhorns," Trine says. "They say nasty things." Hmmm. Sounds like peaceable assembly to me. The several times I've encountered the Tyranny Response Team it appeared as a group of men and women with signs. Their activities seem like a perfectly legitimate exercise of the First Amendment. The Response Team has always appeared to me as a group that wants to win hearts and minds without force, through the legal exchange of public discourse.

To Trine, however, these are not merely Americans who strongly support the Constitution. To her, they are monsters.
"This is a neo-Nazi group that wants to terrorize the whole community," says Trine. "They're very anti-Semitic, anti-gay, racist people. They might as well be wearing KKK caps. They're like the people who hate government and want to bomb federal buildings."

"How do you know that?" I asked Trine.
"That's what people have told me," Trine says. "Everyone knows this."

To get some proof, Trine placed a call this week to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups. As of Tuesday, the center hadn't returned her request for information that would prove the Tyranny Response Team is a bunch of racist hate mongers.
What she may find at the law center, however, is at least as troubling as her own allegations that are based on "what people have told me." Back in 1996, the law center put out a comprehensive list of "anti-Semitic" hate groups. On it, among militias and Ku Klux Klan chapters, was Paladin ArmsÑthe gun store owned by Tyranny Response Team member Glass.

Just after the list came out, I called Morris Dees, the founder and president of the law center. I asked just what information led him to list Glass's business among hate groups. He had no information. Zero. Zip. Nothing other than a hunch that someone who sells guns must be anti-Semitic. When I explained to Dees that Glass was Bar-Mitzvahed in New York City in 1968, he seemed shocked. I told Dees that Bob Glass was inspired to sell guns because his aunts and uncles died in the Holocaust after Hitler forcefully disarmed them. Not knowing what to say, Dees blamed his staff for the careless inclusion of Paladin Arms on a list of anti-Semites.

Rainbow gunners

Not surprisingly, the Response Team rallies I've seen have included more people of color than are found in the gatherings they typically picket. At a recent public hearing on proposed gun laws in Boulder, the pro-gunners were a far more ethnically and racially diverse mix than the handful of Million Mom Marchers who showed up to speak out against guns.

Despite Trine's slanderous portrayal of the pro-gunners she hates, it's fair that she didn't want them at her meeting. So as they arrived, Trine says, she began insisting that they put their names on a list. "I couldn't get their attention," Trine says. "They were ignoring me. So I just put the clipboard in front of his camera and he starts yelling Ôassault.' Then he lowers the camera and he has this black eye. I'm thinking ÔOh great, he has a black eye. It must be an old one, and now he's going to say I hurt him.'" Trine insists she didn't smack Keifer with a clipboard. Keifer and five witnesses say she did. Cops may charge her for assault. Not being there, I can't say who's telling the truth.

What's for certain, however, is that Trine hates her opponents. Without basis, she calls them racist, anti-Semitic hate mongers. She does so, without regard for truth, to further her own political cause. She had no business physically confronting Keifer, in any manner, with a clipboard. The pro-gunners have shown, time and time again, that they respect the laws of our land. That's why they treasure the Second Amendment. And that's why they use the First AmendentÑwhich allows them to peaceably assemble and engage in constructive dialogue. Anti-gunners should learn from them, and stop resorting to force.
http://www.trteam.com
 
Here's a copy of my email to Wayne Laugesen in appreciation for his efforts. Hope others do the same. We need all the media allies we can get!
_________________________________________

I just read an article attributed to you describing the events of Cherie Trine in Ft. Collins on 8/15. I must say, thank you for your efforts in investigating and reporting the events, but not drawing conclusions. It is refreshing to see members of the media doing this, and I hope more of your peers across the country would follow suit.

Please keep up the good work.

Brad Mason
Mechanicsville, VA
 
Thank you for that...he is really a good guy...considering he is in a area we here in Colorado call the "Peoples Republic of Boulder"
 
I am just curious, if the camera were taping at the time it would be clear whether George Keifer was hit or not. Do they have the assault on tape?
 
It's the Bolshevik mentality at work again.

Reminds me of a line from Dr. Zhivago: "The time will come when, regardless of your war record, you will all be judged politically." In other words, you have to get your mind right, then you can have a say in the political process. Party members only.

I think TRT is barking up the wrong tree with this one though. No fence sitters were likely present, just true-blues. May as well save the protest for the time/place when you can have the most impact.

On another note, these Million Mom types seem to be pretty violent and obnoxious. What's up with that?
 
Jack99 wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>On another note, these Million Mom types seem to be pretty violent and obnoxious. What's up with that?[/quote]

On multiple occasions, I've had anti types confess to me that they don't want a gun because they're afraid they might shoot someone just because that someone made them angry or upset.
Apparently, these types are afflicted with the "if I'm that way, then everybody's that way" mentality.
I find this ironic on 2 different levels:
(1)the lack of self control displayed is also part of the criminal mentality, especially among "gang bangers;"
(2)the anti's are, in most cases, the same crowd who preach "celebration of diversity."

I've engaged in many a heated argument with a pistol on my hip. The thought of using it never occured to me because at no point did I feel physically threatened.
My finances are in a sad state, and I could sure stand to be able to get food and such for free, but even so, my self-control, coupled with my sense of morality, preclude me taking anything, even though in many cases I could steal without getting caught.
We are diverse, that's why there are so many different opinions. I guess to the anti's, being diverse is OK only up to a certain point-that point where your opinion on a given issue begins to run counter to theirs.

They are hypocrites, and one of the primary hallmarks of hypocrites is the inablity to see themselves as such even when presented with a mountain of solid evidence. It's upsetting to their version of reality.
I think they are all, to some degree or another, in a state of denial about the reality of the universe in which we live. It's a dangerous place, and has been since the beginning of time. It will continue to be so until it ceases to exist. That's not very comforting, but it's reality, and they can't face it. So they try to change it.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

------------------
Shoot straight & make big holes, regards, Richard at The Shottist's Center
 
"I think TRT is barking up the wrong tree with this one though. No fence sitters were likely present, just true-blues. May as well save the protest for the time/place when you can have the most impact."

Well, just depends on what one is attempting to accomplish. Since we, TRT, started back in late 1/00, we have made it part of our "mission" to hound these sad ladies whereever/whenever. They are attempting to steal our rights (forcefully - at the implied threat of the government gun, BTW) & they get no free rides. "The cost of tyranny just went up."

We have infiltrated their site reflector, downloaded their own "master list" of all their participants (anybody want a copy?), been a royal pain in the butt & have shaken them to the core - at a very personal level.

Sound a bit mean-spirited? So what. It's liable to get worse (better).

Unless you've been to one of these "get togethers," you have no idea as to how they go down. Perceptions (either gleaned from news reports or even posts on the 'net) do not do them justice. For the most part, we only present "the other side" of the issue - call them on their "facts," etc.

I too have CCWd at most every protest, demo, venue and have never thought about it one way or another, even while in heated debate (as with another above), even while having the opposition spit at us, yell for us to "kill our children," ... the invectives spewed by such as these is really unbelieveable.

Why, we hardly bark at all. ;) We do, however, present a factual counter to their lies.

While we only wish to be left alone, people such as the MMM, et al, would, if they could, stand there with their own guns, herding us into the cattle cars.

Somebody want to take away my rights? Better pack a lunch ....

BTW, Wayne is the same gentleman who who the article "One man packs, while another attacks" (posted here in TFL a couple/three months back or so). Told of another event where another anti physically attacked another of our people.

Anybody see a common thread here in the antis' plea for "public safety" while physically assaulting others through their frustration of not getting their way? Lotta stinkin' spoiled brats if you ask me.

[This message has been edited by labgrade (edited August 27, 2000).]
 
45KING, it has long been my contention that most of the anti-freedom terrorists, such as the MMM people, know that they would shoot someone in a New York minute if they were armed and they think everybody else is of the same mind frame. "Since I'd shoot the paperboy if he hits the hedge again, everybody else would do it also. I don't have guns to prevent that happening so nobody else should own guns either."


Doesn't this sort of go along with the violence of an anti-freedom terrorist at the gun show where he was overturning tables and the vandalism at the SAS display by the MMM nazis.
------------------
Ne Conjuge Nobiscum
"If there be treachery, let there be jehad!"

[This message has been edited by Jim V (edited August 27, 2000).]
 
I've noticed that allot of anti's seem to be ultra-violent also. I can tell you that becoming a gun owner has changed my life; for the better. I used to be a "hate" monger, irresponsible, and arguementative. Now, I think (that's the main point) before I speak, act, or go with "well, that's what I've heard" BS. Now I go out of my way to understand another group; I've met many new friends who are of different origin/color/background. I've become ALLOT more responsible; not only with keeping my guns out of the reach of others but also with finances; daily life. I don't argue any longer. I try to refrain from getting myself into any situation that may become explosive and I go out of my way to avoid trouble. I obey laws better now and I go out of my way to ensure that I stay a law abiding person. Maybe the anti's should become gun owners because if it can change me for the better, maybe it can help them also.

USP45usp
 
IMHO, what needs to be done is to financially crush each and every member of the MMM. If their stupidness results in so much as a scrape, file charges and immediately ask for an ambulance. Do not even mention the insurance card in your wallet. "My assailant will be paying for this, ma'am." Or even better, claim it on your health insurance and then call your insurance company and explain to them that this was the result of criminal assault. Your insurance company has attornies that are on regular payroll that will go after the MMM member for every penny that they can get, at no expense to you or them. When you are in the hospital remember, Tylenol can cost as much as $8 there. :D
 
'Nother thing about countering the MMM in public ....

When in a debate, you are not necessarily attempting to sway the opposition to your point of view. However, you are speaking to the audience to sway their view/s.

Yup, MMM-types are "true believers" & I have no illusions as to turning them around (although we have had some pretty good ones at the personal level which has caused some different considerations where they stand - you gotta understand that these folk get all their info from VPC/HCI, et al & have never heard the truth) but, by just being there & having these events , we do get press coverage & that's where we get to tell our side - as in the article above.

The readers of the reports on the events are the audience.

Articles such as above (and a few others) point out very succinctly the differences in the two sides' stance. We're the good guys & they suck. ;)
 
It looks like they accomplished a great deal... they remained calm in the face of adversity. At no time did they turn into gun totin' boogey men, these anti-2nd hypocrites aren't going to learn otherwise unless we get in their face. Break down the stereotypes...

Peace...
keith
 
It's time not to be Politically Correct. In your face! With all that is happening on all fronts to attack our RIGHTS, I applaude thes Patriots for their action. Many will be crucified who stand up for our rights. Public meeting,Public response! MMM, just another 3 letter word.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Satanta:
right after the mmm DC march there was a story about a mmm'er who shot and killed some guy because she thought he had killed her son...she was busted on several illegal gun charges and murder. Turns out it was the wrong guy.
[/quote]

Darnit!! And I would have posted that artcile here.. only I left it with my parents this weekend when I was visiting and forgot to bring it back with me. I believe the gal's name was Barbara Libscomb (sp?), and she was one of the organizers..

I found it quite humorous actually.. in a sick kind of way, of course.



------------------
God, Guns and Guts made this country a great country!

oberkommando sez:
"We lost the first and third and now they are after the Second!(no pun intended)"
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by robnoel:

"I guess the police favor the biggest bullies in these cases."

"These are very scary people.

They're mostly great big men, and many of them are somewhat fat.

They act like bullies and they yell nasty things.

"These are bad people."

[/quote]

WTF???

Looks like this Cherie Trine is a certified nutcase! She should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

I also applaud the TRT’s efforts. Keep up the good work.

Skyhawk
 
What about civil suits? She has slandered an organiztion, and she has attacked (maybe) a member. Maybe the TRT should start using this bastardized legal system against those who created it.
 
I'd posted in the other, similar thread/.

Here goes.

She's a day care provider? WTF!!!

Is this woman still operating this business?, and if so, why? I couldn't imagine anyone wanting a person tending, and guarding, my most precious with a temperament like that.

Yeah, yeah, I know, a lioness.
Or another way to phrase it, a lyin a$$.

If the claim of A&B can be substantiated by the camera, thereby removing any trace of doubt, she should be behind bars. She needs to learn this one the hard way.

41 years old, and hasn't figured out yet what constitutes peaceful assembly. Trust me, she won't firgure it out, until she wakes up in jail a couple mornings in a row.
And her life is changed forever.
All because she never learned when to shut the hell up, and watch and listen. And learn.

For one, she should no longer be running a day-care facility. Let her hire an attorney with lost income, another lesson about personal control.

A question to LEO here::

Can she still operate such a facility (Day-Care Center) after being charged alone, or does due process have to run it's full course here?

If so, why are the children to be exposed to an obviously disturbed person who clearly exhibited inability to handle opposition. And wouldn't that extend the concern to her chosen career?
What makes anyone think she doesn't use the same "methods" with her clients' children?

Seen plenty of cases where the same 'nutcases' were slapping the sh!t out of some innocent little child.
As I'd said, if it were me, that one would be in deep Kimchee.

------------------
"To control people you control the food, to control a nation you control the FUEL."

H. Kissenger
 
Donny, best question yet. And good for the victum to follow up on and definitley try to press charges if possible, maybe have her license revoked.
 
Back
Top