(MI) Detroit Police get deadly ammo - Critics plan to protest

Oatka

New member
The Criminal Protection League cries out in protest.
http://www.detnews.com/2000/metro/0008/02/d01-99468.htm

Police get deadly ammo
Detroit cops say hollow-point rounds protect bystanders. Critics plan to protest decision

By George Hunter / The Detroit News

DETROIT -- A stipulation in the new Detroit police contract that allows officers to use hollow-point bullets has some residents and city officials up in arms, but police say the new bullets are safer than the ammunition in use.
Hollow-point bullets expand on impact, which can seriously damage internal organs. Because of the damage the bullets can inflict, they remain outlawed under the Geneva Convention's rules of war.
If hollow-point bullets are potentially too damaging to be used in wars, they shouldn't be used by Detroit police, said Ron Scott, director of the Detroit Coalition Against Police Brutality. Scott said the organization is planning a demonstration against the use of hollow-point ammunition.
"By using hollow-point bullets, the Detroit Police Department has thrown down the gauntlet," Scott said. "It's a statement that they're not going to just try to stop someone until the danger is over. The point is to destroy, maim and kill."
But most Metro Detroit police departments -- including Grosse Pointe, West Bloomfield Township, Livonia, Michigan State Police and the Wayne, Oakland and Macomb County sheriff's departments -- already use hollow-point bullets, which the departments call limited-penetration, full-expansion bullets. Most big city police departments, including New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco, use hollow-point ammunition.
Hollow-point bullets are safer than the standard bullet, known as full metal jacket bullets, currently employed by Detroit police because hollow-point bullets are less likely to pass through the intended target and strike an innocent bystander, said Rich Weaver, secretary and treasurer of the Detroit Police Officer's Association. Hollow-point bullets are much less likely to pass through a body because they expand on impact.
"The full-metal jacket bullets often go clean through a person's body with enough force to cause damage to other people," said Weaver, who researched different types of ammunition two years ago for the police department. "With hollow-points, there's less risk of innocent people being hurt."
Another problem with the standard bullet is that it makes a clean wound, and the person who is shot often can continue to fight, Weaver said.
"It's not like the police are going around shooting innocent people," Weaver said. "And when we do have a reason to shoot somebody, we want them to be incapacitated as quickly as possible. Hollow-points serve that purpose."
But Detroit Councilwoman Sheila Cockrel said she strongly opposes hollow-point bullets because, if police do mistakenly shoot someone, it's likely to result in death.
"We just settled a case where the police went into a man's house and arrested him by mistake," Cockrel said. "He wasn't shot -- but what if he had been? The chances of him dying from a hollow-point bullet would be much greater."
While Cockrel said she appreciates the dangers that Detroit police face every day, "they do make mistakes sometimes. And, then, if you issue hollow-point bullets, you're likely to have another grieving mother and father at a funeral."

Council blocked hollow-points
The Detroit Police Commission approved the use of hollow-point bullets in January 1999. But the Commission's approval was rendered void when the city council refused to allow the city to buy the ammunition.
Cockrel said she plans to fight the issuance of hollow-point ammunition again.
"I'm looking into whether or not the arbitrator's decision (allowing hollow-point bullets to be used) is legally binding, or if it's still something that can be challenged," Cockrel said. "If there is a way to legally challenge this, I'm going to vote against it. You can take that to the bank."
Detroit police aren't carrying the new ammunition yet. Chief Benny Napoleon must approve the bullets before his officers can use them. In the past, Napoleon has strongly supported the use of hollow-point bullets.
The Detroit Police Officers Association has recommended two types of hollow-point bullets for approval: The Winchester partial gold round; and the CCI-Speer gold dot, both for use in .40-caliber Glocks.
"Those bullets expand less than other hollow-points," Weaver said. "But they still create a large enough wound channel to effectively stop a criminal."

Brass back hollow-points
Several Detroit police officers welcomed the arbitrator's decision to allow hollow-points.
"If the department supplies the hollow-points, I will use them," said Sgt. T.J. Smoot, a 30-year-veteran.
Police spokesman Octaveious Miles said he'll likely use a combination of hollow-point bullets and full-metal jacket ammunition.
"Hollow-point bullets are effective at close to moderate range," Miles said. "However, if a incident occurs where you are forced to use your weapon at a distance, hollow-points are not as effective as full metal jackets."
Officers in suburban police departments said it's time for Detroit cops to begin using hollow-point bullets.
"It's long overdue," Farmington Hills Police Chief William Dwyer said. "It's a safer bullet. There has been some debate about them because the injury can be more severe to the person who is wounded by a hollow-point. But police officers only fire, only use deadly force, in order to kill. We don't fire our weapons to wound."

Bullets stir controversy
The controversy of hollow-point bullets isn't confined to Detroit. In New York, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was sharply criticism when he announced that New York cops would be issued hollow-point bullets a few days after Amadou Diallo, an unarmed street vendor, was shot 19 times by four New York police officers.
In response to the criticism, Giuliani said that if the police had used hollow-point bullets, they wouldn't have had to shoot Diallo as many times.
When Los Angeles police were allowed to use hollow-point bullets in 1990, legal challenges to stop the issuance of the ammunition failed.
New York transit police were issued hollow-point ammunition in 1990. Since then, only one person has been hit by a hollow-point bullet passing through the body of the intended victim. That compares with 17 bystanders who were hit during that time by full-metal jacket bullets that passed through the bodies of people shot by police.
But according to a 1989 study published in the Journal of Forensic Sciences, 80 percent of the shots fired in police shoot-outs miss their targets.
"More often than not, police miss what they're shooting at," Scott said. "That means an innocent bystander is more likely to be killed if the police are using hollow-points."
Hollow-point bullets have been controversial for more than a century. During the Hague Disarmament Conference of 1899, representatives of 26 nations decided to disallow the use of hollow-point bullets during wartime. The subsequent Versailles and Geneva peace treaties also outlawed the use of the ammunition.

Detroit News Staff Writer David G. Grant and Mike Martindale contributed to this report.
 
This is a good article for pro hollow point use. When a police chief or other politician wants to ban hollow points for civilian use you can bring this article up showing that other police disagree(IT'S A SAFER BULLET).

------------------
"Gun Control is Only to Protect Those in Power"
 
Looks like Federal's new EFMJ is just the ticket for today's hypersensitive environment. It does not look like an evil hollowpoint, yet performs as well or better since it doesn't have a cavity that can get plugged with clothes. Police and CCWers get a round that is Politically Correct (look, ma, nice and round, no nasty Petals Of Death), and the PC nazis won't have much to crow about.

It boggles the mind...I always figured that if you have reason to employ a firearm against someone, it ought to be as dangerous as possible. These morons are going to get people killed sooner or later. Oh, wait, they already are. But rest assured, it's all for the children and against police brutality.
 
Dave..yes, expanding ammo is prohibited under the Geneva Accord. They forget that this is not warfare though, and Geneva doesn't apply.
This debate is 30 years old, and I am suprised that it is still being waged. the evidence long ago came down on the side of expanding ammo.
 
Detroit Coalition Against Police Brutality? Is there a coalition for brutality? I had sent the article to several well known firearms trainers that I know and they all said about the same thing, "If people don't know what theya re talking about, they should keep their mouths shut." Referring to Scott and Cockrel.

If LEO's miss their targets 80% of the time in shootings does that not indicate they need more or better training? Has there been a study done since 1989 on this?

------------------
Ne Conjuge Nobiscum
"If there be treachery, let there be jehad!"
 
It's amazing how the lefties say that only the police and military should have guns, and yet they don't want the police to be able to use those guns effectively. It's sloppy thinking, but of course the lefties don't care if it serves their political agenda.

BTW, all of the shootings by the metro police in my area over the last two years have led to outcries by people like the hollowpoint opponents in Detroit. And yet, to me, based on what I was taught in the concealed handgun licensing class, the police were completely justified in every instance. I think this suggests that concealed carry licensees are natural allies of the police, particularly when a sidearm has to be used in self-defense. And we're obviously a lot more supportive of LEOs than anti-gunners like the ones in Detroit.

My $0.02.
 
This is an aside, but my boss is a major leftist anti who thinks only the govt. should have guns, yet he complains that police are thugs and fascists and "cut from the same cloth" as criminals???????????????????


With specious reasoning like that, from a Harvard educated ding-a-ling yet, how can you hope to deal with the slightly dimmer dimbulbs on the left.
 
I've lost track of the number of articles commenting that we never signed the "Geneva Convention" deal about expanding bullets in military weapons.

When I was on occupation duty in Korea in '54-'55, we carried a Geneva Convention card talking about how we were to be treated if somehow the North Koreans got hold of us. Yeah, right. And no comments, please, about any special deals on the Brooklyn Bridge.

Art
 
No, expanding bullets are most certainly NOT prohibited by the Geneva Convention. Dum-Dum bullets (soft lead with an X cut into them so the bullet will quarter inside a body) are banned by the HAGUE ACCORDS, which we never even signed.
Hollowpoints are not banned by any international agreement that I know of.
 
This is kinda interesting actually. I'm having a hard time trying to express my thoughts so please bear with me.

All the anti gun propaganda that's been spewed out, is now affecting the legitimate use of the evil hollowpoint by the LE community. Disregarding records of bad shoots, and the exception rather than the rule bad apple, can't hit the side of a barn, etc., in the LE community, (no disrespect intended), this campaign/response is being driven by the same typical emotional response of the anti crowd to private ownership and gun sports in general.

This is, I believe, one of the unintended consequences of the anti's campaign, coming back to bite in a way, I would think, that wasn't supposed to happen in the grand scheme of the anti movement. After all only criminals would require something like the evil hollowpoint according to the anti's rant up to this point in time. LEO's have now joined the club that we, the legitimate gunowners, have been fighting to defend.

IMHO, this "badness" continues to spread and grow in ways unforeseen by the powers that be.

Hope this makes sense.
 
After awhile, the only logical conclusion is that reality simply isn't important to leftists ... ;)


Regarding the Geneva Convention, I don't think the point is we signed it or not ... it apparently provides support for the illogic that hollow-points are 'evil' ammunition.

I've heard of this agreement for years. Can anyone educate us on why hollow-points received such special treatment? Was it simply a function of some of the same ignorance we see expressed in the article? I recognize that over-penetration would not be an issue in war ... as a matter of fact, it would probably be an advantage, no?

Regards from AZ
 
You're going to want to check my facts here, but I seem to remember that the Geneva and Hague Accords focussed a lot on reducing the deadliness of war.

FMJ ammo is supposed to be more "humane" than hollow point ammo, I guess that punching the same diameter hole through someone would be less lethal than the hole a hollowpoint makes.

Just a SHAG, though.

LawDog
 
Hmmm, it is more humane to be blown apart by a frag or mortar round than it is to be hit by a hollow-point??? What about 50 cals? Those bastards will take a limb off and the are FMJ...
 
These people against hollow points need to take into account the fact that FMJ rounds are waaaay more likely to penetrate the walls of a structure, and when talking about stray bullets killing people, usually that's where they do so, by passing through walls into people inside. Most people knowing there is a cop/bg gunfight outside get inside and lock the door. At least around here they do, I imagine such logic is fairly universal. Taking this into mind, a hollow point is much much more likely to kill just the BG. Oh well.

Denis certainly brought up a good point with that quote though.... wtf indeed.

------------------
I twist the facts until they tell the truth. -Some intellectual sadist

The Bill of Rights is a document of brilliance, a document of wisdom, and it is the ultimate law, spoken or not, for the very concept of a society that holds liberty above the desire for ever greater power. -Me
 
Back
Top