Maybe dumb ? 22lr in a 22mag revolver?

The Heritage arms rough rider and NAA mini can both be had as convertables. There are other, less common, older revolvers that share this feature made by H&R and Iver Johnson.

Ruger's single six is a nice gun, but you won't notice the difference in how they shoot between it and a rough rider until you've put 10K or 20k rounds through them.

I've shot .22lr from a .22 mag before (I forgot which cylinder I had in it. It split every single case and it was hard to eject the empies. I still wanted to shoot and .22 lr was all I had so I kept shooting. I've also considered making a sleeve for .22lr but never tried it. I think masking tape would work too.

The pressures involved with a .22 are so low that some leaking gas from a split case don't worry w much. I'd be worried more by the potential for lead being shaved from the fotcing cone or a partial barrel obstruction from a sliver of brass.
 
I had a SW 651 and it spewed unburned powder. You could see at on a paper target at 7 yards. After 50 rounds, it would seize up with the gunk.

So I sold it and now they are worth a mint. :o

Anyway, the fireball is a blast - I have a NAA 22 Mag mini and I fired it in an indoor range between two partitions and I thought I blew up.:eek:

I felt the blast push my hair back and sweep under my glasses. :eek:

YMMV, though.
 
I can't speak for any other convertible .22/.22Mag revolvers, but the S&W Model 48's rate of twist was set up for the .22 Mag. Accuracy, even at 15 feet was abysmal with .22 LR. Apparently the slower rate of twist was insufficient to stabilize the slower .22 LR bullets for anything other than casual plinking.
 
I've also considered making a sleeve for .22lr but never tried it. I think masking tape would work too.
Click to expand...
You're kidding right? The 22lr operates at 24K psi. Ain't no tape that strong.

Jim
Click to expand...

My question is: Why are only three of us pointing out the safety issues with these 'adapters'?

Using a .22 WMR hull as a chamber adapter for .22 LR; is equivalent to saying it's okay to shoot .257 Roberts out of my 8x57mm, as long as I jam some 1/4" ID copper tubing down the barrel; since they share the same headspace dimension.

Making tape? Seriously?! Would you use masking tape to replace your car's brake pads? Would it be okay to shoot .30-30 ammo in my .30-06, as long as I filled the chamber with sand?

You're talking about tens of thousands of pounds per square inch.

Firearms are not toys. Don't arbitrarily experiment with them.
 
Please forgive my ignorance but. Can you shoot 22lr in a 22mag revolver? I am thinking about getting a 22mag revolver like a Taurus 941 and was wondering if you could safely shoot the 22lr in that gun to save on ammo. I have never done anything with 22mag other that shot a friend's gun. Is it safe or totally stupid? Would it damage the cylinder?
Click to expand...

Just make it easier on yourself and get a Ruger Single-Six if you really want to have dual capability of both .22lr and .22wmr. It's built for it and comes with two cylinders that you can switch out in seconds. It's also a great gun period that will give you years of service and shooting fun.
 
As in a lot of cases here--nobody answered the mans question !!
Click to expand...
And, as in a lot of cases here, nobody reads all the posts in the thread... the first response to the OP's post did answer it.

Jim
 
RF in Mag? Having said all of how to do it, it is probably a VERY BAD IDEA.

w_houle said:
Hey! Before we get into a caliber war: can anyone evaluate my last statement?
Click to expand...
On the subject of making a sleeve or adapter to allow shooting 22 RF in 22 Mag RF chambers, I will render an opinion contrary to wiser, more experienced shooters.

It could be done. Particularly considering the experience with the 22 Jet cartridge.

The 22 Jet was a 357 cartridge necked down to .22 caliber. As far as I know, only S&W made a revolver chambered for it, but memory tricks tell me there might have been a Thompson-Contender barrel, too. It's too late for me to look it up and the trivia is irrelevant anyway.

The way the cartridge was tapered (not so much a shoulder like you would expect from a bottlenecked rifle-type cartridge, but more of a gentle taper), the guns had some extraction problems, but performed very well most of the time with clean chambers and in all other respects. Still, the centerfire 22 caliber full-size revolver was not a commercial success and was discontinued.

There were inserts to allow firing the much cheaper 22 rimfire in the 22 Jet chambers. You would insert 22 RF cartridges into the inserts. Then load the inserts just as you would regular 22 Jet cartridges. Ejection was typical. I believe the inserts were made of aluminum. (Anyone know for sure?) Just as the masking tape solution? does not require strength, the aluminum was supported by the strength of the steel of the chambers.

But the experience does tend to suggest that one could do it. One could also, theoretically, machine inserts for any 22 magnum chamber to accomodate 22 RF in Long Rifle, Long, Short or CB Caps.

The thinness of the walls of the insert would probably be a design and manufacturing challenge.

Having said all that, it is probably a VERY BAD IDEA. (See FrankenMauser's post right after this one. I believe he knows more about this than I do. And we agree.)

Lost Sheep

I think High Standard made an interchangeable cylinder 9-shot double action 22 rimfire revolver in 22 RF and 22 Mag. Can anyone confirm? I think it was the Sentinel or the Longhorn back in the '70s.
 
Last edited:
There were inserts to allow firing the much cheaper 22 rimfire in the 22 Jet chambers. You would insert 22 RF cartridges into the inserts. Then load the inserts just as you would regular 22 Jet cartridges. Ejection was typical. I believe the inserts were made of aluminum. (Anyone know for sure?) Just as the masking tape solution? does not require strength, the aluminum was supported by the strength of the steel of the chambers.
Click to expand...

Chamber inserts have been made of many types of materials. The chamber does support some of them. (Aluminum is not common; as it compresses easier than steel, and has a very short working life) However, masking tape and .22 WMR hulls allow expansion. Chamber inserts usually do not. Another thing the masking tape solution does not fix, is that of the throat. The .22 WMR has a typical center fire chamber; not a rimfire-style chamber. As such, the .22 WMR has a lip, where the case ends and the bullet is exposed. If a .22 LR bullet was to hit the lip; it could cause tumbling of the bullet, or severe fouling (to the point that subsequent rounds could reach an over pressure condition and rupture).

Many, many chamber inserts are still available for many chamberings. However, almost 100% are made of steel (even for .22 rimfire calibers in larger original chamberings).

As I said in my last post:
Firearms are not toys. Don't arbitrarily experiment with them.
Click to expand...
(Unless you are a certified engineer, with the proper equipment. But, that wouldn't be arbitrary, would it?)
 
gkdir
As in a lot of cases here--nobody answered the mans question !!
__________________
"Normal "is just a setting on your dryer.
Click to expand...
Which question did you find unanswered? Please be specific. A quote of the particular one would be best.

I found that the main question,
surfzombie said:
Can you shoot 22lr in a 22mag revolver?
Click to expand...
was answered here, and very specifically:
Post #3, Paragraph 1 Sentence 3
Post #8, Paragraph 1 Sentence 2
Post #10, whole post.
Post #21, Paragraph 3 Sentences 1 and 2

Lost Sheep

What is the setting on your dryer?
 
Last edited:
I can't speak for any other convertible .22/.22Mag revolvers, but the S&W Model 48's rate of twist was set up for the .22 Mag. Accuracy, even at 15 feet was abysmal with .22 LR. Apparently the slower rate of twist was insufficient to stabilize the slower .22 LR bullets for anything other than casual plinking.
Click to expand...

That has not been my experience, but YMMV. I have been very happy with my S&W M48 with a .22LR cylinder. It serves as a wonderful understudy for my S&W centerfire revolvers.

I would suggest trying a variety of .22LR ammo, if you have not already done so. Luckily, mine has been happy with Federal 550 bulk HP's from Wally World. I have certainly had the experience of terrible accuracy from some varieties of .22LR in a S&W M17, which is of course a dedicated rimfire platform.
 
Wow, what a bunch of yap,yap, yap! Op NO WAY! see photo.

The BS factor here is fierce; I cannot even finish reading this thread. Opinion yourself to death posters, but the OP asks a question;

The diameter of the .22LR is slightly smaller than the .22 Winchester Magnum Rimfire (WMR) & the extra space allows the cartridge to expand & rupture dangerously to the user & bystanders when fired in a WMR cylinder. Always SAFETY First. I am attaching a photo of ruptured .22 fired in a WMR cylinder.

Maineboatman
Maineboatman at cox dot net


PS; my Yada,.... I own Taurus Model 94 (.22LR) & Model 941 (.22WMR) revolvers & enjoy them. Model 941 3" is a fireball to shoot. The M94 is hard to extract after continued shooting & I use my pocketknife to tap on the extractor as after 100+ rounds your palm will be bloodblisters. I do not believe this to be an uncommon problem among all .22 revolvers.
 

Attachments

  • 22 LR fire out of a magnum WMR.jpg
    22 LR fire out of a magnum WMR.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 68
That has not been my experience, but YMMV. I have been very happy with my S&W M48 with a .22LR cylinder. It serves as a wonderful understudy for my S&W centerfire revolvers.

I would suggest trying a variety of .22LR ammo, if you have not already done so. Luckily, mine has been happy with Federal 550 bulk HP's from Wally World. I have certainly had the experience of terrible accuracy from some varieties of .22LR in a S&W M17, which is of course a dedicated rimfire platform.
Click to expand...

LOL Actually, I got rid of it. If I shoot .22 Magnum at all (very rarely any more), I use a Ruger Single Six that I picked up in a pawn shop a few years back. But I do agree with about trying different types of ammo.
 
.22 lr in .22 mag

I had a friend who used to do this in his NAA .22 mag mini-revolter. He had more than a few split cases. Later on in life, I obtained a Savage 24 in .22 mag/20 ga. configuration. I tried the .22 mag. case cut off to act as a sleeve and it did fire without splitting cases. I was pretty amazed and filed it away in that "for emergency use only" section of my brain.

While this did work and wasn't at all difficult to remove as far as the sleeve went, the thought occurred to me that this makeshift sleeve was acting as a short section of barrel would, once the bullet left the .22 l.r. case. Probably not a real great idea for long-term use. If my life depended on it, I would probably do it and have no second thoughts on it. It did work amazingly well with that improvised sleeve but seems that sleeve is going to wear out real fast.

To add to this, someone did this "for science" in his convertible cylinder revolver. He fired .22 lr CCI out of the .22 mag cylinder with no sleeves. He got very bulged cases and a velocity drop of 1/3. Those .22 l.r. speeds were 300~fps less than when fired from the proper cylinder. I would think the sleeved cylinder would not have experienced that drop in velocity. Search deuce & guns channel on youtube for the film on the guy doing this. Here it is actually.
https://youtu.be/NlE4jjFsMOU

So, to address the original poster's question directly, I would say yes. One could do this. Is it such a great idea for other than an emergency situation? Not really if you ask me. If that were my survival option, I would have some prepared "sleeves" stuffed into the bug out bag along with some .22 lr ammo in addition to the proper ammo. Hope that answers the OP's original question.
 
The OP said he was considering a 22 WMR revolver for a Bug.

I think 22 WMR is a reasonable round for a Bug. Particularly if you have a primary gun in a larger caliber.

I'm sure I'll get some push back on this, but I also think 22LR, with high velocity rounds like CCI Velocitors, is a useful Bug round. Especially given the 8 round capacity of most modern 22LR revolvers.

Perhaps the OP should consider an LCR in 22 LR as an alternative to the Taurus he mentioned.

Smith and Wesson also has some small/light 22 revolvers, but they are pretty pricey.
 
Instead of dragging up a 7 year old zombie thread why don't you start a new thread on the same subject. The new post will be more relevant that way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top