That is a weakness of the bill. Coupled with the fact that there are zero provisions for LEOs who lost ammo, sold it, or gave it away. A campaign to erase the LEO exemption would find the "support" seriously eroded.
While you're at it. There are several shotguns on the regulated weapons list. How do they expect that requirement to work for them?
The entire premise is ridiculous. It is also backed by more junk science. Maryland spends hundreds of thousands of dollars establishing up to date records on fired shell casings as it is. This would simply add to the expense, with the same results, a political black hole.
You'll notice where any excess funds go? Why, they're earmarked for the General Fund, the pork pot-pie.
Another weakness is the wording. They require this ammunition for handguns, and restricted weapons, ONLY. There is no provision for the "only" to be determined. .22 lr ammunition used in rifles is, by definition, exempted. So would 9mm and .45 ACP used in the Marlin Camp rifles, or the High Poinr Carbines, or the Ruger Carbines. Under the proposed law, anyone stating that their use of those calibers in long-guns not on the regulated list, would have to be able to purchase ammunition without the tax.
Handloading would not actually be proscribed, as any long-gun caliber not associated with the list would be allowed. I would think that any caliber used in the various long-guns, as mentioned above, would also be exempted.
This is going to be a series of disasters for out-of-state hunters, as well. The Eastern Shore, and the Western Counties derive a substantial amount of revenue from hunters. That would soon dry up. It would be illegal for you to possess unserialized cartridges, or reloaded cartridges, in many popular calibers.
Time to fire up the media machines, like the Washington Post, with demands that there be NO EXCEPTIONS to the law, and severe PENALTIES visited on any state organization that loses ammunition into the public. The Post, being knee-jerk antis, should at least publicize the information, if not actively support the ideas. Painting the politicians supporting the bill as anti-law, and faced with a loss of support from state agencies, it should die a quick death.
After all, it's for the Children!!:barf: