Your right, perhaps taking the life of one of his children in exchange would be the better punishment. Property is property and all. Hows that go, eye for an eye....I hope you guys are never put in the position where you have to choose between your dog's life and the life of another human being. No matter how you feel about them, they're still just a dog. Property. Self defense is one thing (even in a case of mistaken identity) but a police officer being murdered and his children growing up without a father is NOT justice over a slain pet.
Thats purely a matter of opinion. A lot depends on where you are and who you are, and your feelings on the matter.human life is worth more than a dog's, period-
The problem here is, they have given themselves immunity, and unless you can prove willful wrongdoing, they have noting to worry about.Suing the city does no good; they don't care.
Good point.May the Gods have mercy on your soul if you happen to shoot/injure a police dog.
I have to totally disagree, the only cold blooded murder was that of the dog.
Your right, perhaps taking the life of one of his children in exchange would be the better punishment. Property is property and all. Hows that go, eye for an eye....
Thats purely a matter of opinion.
What that got to do with firearm ownership?If you truly believe that the life of a dog is equal to the life of a child, you are not fit to own a firearm. YOU scare me far more than any cop that accidentally busts into the wrong house and has to shoot somebody's dog.
Its still a matter of opinion. I've seen more civility and morality from my dogs than from a lot of the humans I've run across.Wrong, it is a matter of established law and morality. When dogs create civiliation from nothing I'll be willing to consider putting more value on their lives. Feel free at any time to remove yourself from society and retreat to a remote place and worship dogs as equals but do not expect any rational person to do the same.
Get real. You can eat dogs without moral or legal problems. The objection to killing another person's dog is that it deprives them of their property. People aren't property.Thats purely a matter of opinion. A lot depends on where you are and who you are, and your feelings on the matter.human life is worth more than a dog's, period-
Perhaps where you are now. It hasnt always been the case here. Or have they already removed that part of our history from the schools history books?People aren't property.
No more loony than any other "cult".....yet the irrational dog-lovers here probably think those eastern cultures that worship cattle are loony.
Is that the way out to safety?Threads like this make gun owners look bad, and I regret posting here.
When I read this thread the first time, I thought there were a bunch of people calling for insane, immoral, and illegal retribution. Turns out it was just you, like here where you promote the cold-blooded retributive murder of the cop's children "in exchange for" killing your dog:Is that the way out to safety?
Regardless of what you own, and regardless if your the most squeaky clean example of the owner, you can and will, easily be portrayed as anything the propagandist wishes, and at their whim.
If you think that your shying away from the "subject" will make it better, think again. Those who retreat to the end of the line seeking safety, tend to suffer the most when its their turn.
Fear truly is the mind killer.
Your right, perhaps taking the life of one of his children in exchange would be the better punishment. Property is property and all.