M&P Shield 9 Issue

JT8

Inactive
I recently bought a S&W M&P Shield 9mm for a CC, and with the intentions of eventually passing it over to my wife. I really love the pistol, besides the recoil spring tension. I can lock the slide to the rear without an issue, but I did notice that it was more difficult than most pistols I've worked with. My wife can barely do it at all. The combination of the tension and the slide lock being a little stubborn has made it impossible for me to properly train her on how to use the pistol.

My question is, would looking for an aftermarket recoil spring be the best option, or should I just try and work the spring until it loosens up?
 
Not really. I think the recoil spring just needed to be that stiff for that gun to operate reliably.

Maybe someone will come along and correct me. I never read about an improvement to that issue.
 
I have a Shield 9mm and I love it - but I agree with you - the racking is extremely stiff. I'm older and have some hand issues but I still am working at it in the hopes that in time, the slide will be a bit more user friendly.

You might want to go to the S & W Forum and put a post as well. I've also wondered about the recoil spring and if a replacement is available that will make the slide not so stiff.

Just a side note that I think relates to the same thing. I reload and shoot cast that I cast myself. I had a Ruger SR9 - my first 9mm. (I've been a revolver shooter for 50 years). Using a 120is grain cast bullet over 3.5 grains of Bulls Eye made the SR9 cycle perfectly and was the "sweet spot" for that pistol. When I got the Shield, I figured the same round would work well out of it as well. Wrong! That round would not cycle the Shield - I had FTE quite a bit. Bumping the charge up to 3.7 to 3.8 grains of Bulls Eye, the Shield would cycle. Just goes to show you that no two pistols are alike and some stiffer than others.
 
Yeah the slide lock is a bugger and the recoil spring is kind of stiff. After a couple hundred rounds mine seems to be easier to lock back. It may have to do with 'break in' or I've just developed the technic to lock back the slide.
 
Last edited:
Did they ever loosen up with time/use?
Mine was extremely stiff when new. I saw some posts about locking the slide back every night. I did that for a few months and also I've run about 500-600 rounds through it (it is a fun gun to shoot!). It's definitely easier to rack now than when it was new. However, I think it will always be stiff to rack. It is what it is.

Myself, I would not change the recoil spring. Little subcompact autos with Browning's tilt barrel have been known to have reliability problems for decades, mostly due to timing issues.

Makers of the latest generation of subcompact guns like the Shield, XDS, G43 etc, have finally figured out how to get all the variables right but going with a lighter recoil spring weight may increase slide speed and may compromise reliability.
 
Check the notch on the slide for the slide release. It may have a slight 'reverse cut' making the slide release difficult to operate. (The slide release has to move the slide back just a bit, against the tension of the recoil spring). My ladyfriend's Sig P250 had that, and a few passes with a file fixed it.
 
going with a lighter recoil spring weight may increase slide speed and may compromise reliability.

That was my main concern. I'm a tactics instructor with the Air Force, so most of my time is spent with a Barretta M9. It has a fairly relaxed recoil spring, and there are countless times the cycle of operation is interrupted. I love this Shield, but it seems I may have to get her something that's a little more user friendly for someone without the experience.

I appreciate all the input guys.
 
If you can find a 45 Shield, see how it is for you. Mine does not seem as stiff as my 9mm Shield.
 
When I first got my Shield 9mm, I really had to struggle to lock the slide back for assembly and disassembly. It did get easier after several hundred rounds. I don't know if the spring loosened up or I developed more muscle, lol. I found it is much easier just to insert an empty mag and pull the slide back until it locks. Then you can drop the mag.

Racking a round into the chamber was never a problem tho.
 
My Shield was very stiff too which is a bit of a pain for me as the arthritis in my hands occasionally acts up. But I can say, it is definitely easier to rack after putting 500 rounds through it. Still not the easiest slide though. I don't know if you would want to consider a .380 for your wife or not, but the new Ruger LCP2 has a very easy slide.
 
I have a 40'and 45 shield.
Yes the spring is stiff.
Small gun with short fairly light slide equals stiff spring.
It will ease some with use.
The slide lock is just that. LOCK not a release (read the manual) and your best bet is sling shot the slide.
Also smaller folks have better luck using the push method.
Hold slide with weak hand and PUSH the firearm forward then just let go of the slide.

Youll find it much easier done this way.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Sounds like the Shield 9 is simply not the right gun for your spouse.

You might take a look at the Sig P238. Very easy to rack, and a very accurate and reliable sidearm and great for carry.
 
It's not just the Shield, all small 9mm will need to have a stiffer spring than a lrger pistol shooting the same ammo will. It's Physics.

The slide and spring need to be able to dissipate the energy of firing the round and operating the slide. A larger, heavier slide will not need as much spring weight do to it's greater mass.

This is true for all guns, in all calibers. A 3" 45 ACP pistol will be much stiffer than a 5" 45 ACP etc...

As suggested, the M&P Compact might suit your wife better for this reason.
 
Mine became easier to rack after putting a number of rounds through it. Now, if I can just get those magazines springs to ease up.........!
 
Check out the Glock 43. Similar in size to the Shield, but much easier to work the slide. And recoil feels less snappy to me with the G43.

My girlfriend originally wanted the Shield, so I bought her one. Then I got the 43 and she started to spend time with it and now she's wanting to add another 43 to our collection for her.
 
Back
Top