If 200 or even 250 yards is the max distance, then even a .223 with a 1-9 barrel and the right bullets would do *okay* for whitetails. It will hit harder at 200 than the old .44-40 did at 100, and wasn't that supposed to be an okay deer cartridge?
I agree with those of us who recommend the .243, given the described uses. Face it--some people will just never take any shot beyond 300 yards, so all that .308 versatility will be wasted and you'll be contending with heavier recoil all the time.
Why not the 6.5x55? Isn't Hornady making a range of very accurate bullets in that caliber which include varmint "screamers" and heaver numbers suitable for even big mule deer?
For the reloading question, just figure out how many months/years it would take to pay for the equipment by getting your ammo at half-price. Some people will not shoot enough to justify the investment, economically speaking. But the recreational value of expanding your hobby can still make it worthwhile.
I agree with those of us who recommend the .243, given the described uses. Face it--some people will just never take any shot beyond 300 yards, so all that .308 versatility will be wasted and you'll be contending with heavier recoil all the time.
Why not the 6.5x55? Isn't Hornady making a range of very accurate bullets in that caliber which include varmint "screamers" and heaver numbers suitable for even big mule deer?
For the reloading question, just figure out how many months/years it would take to pay for the equipment by getting your ammo at half-price. Some people will not shoot enough to justify the investment, economically speaking. But the recreational value of expanding your hobby can still make it worthwhile.