Looking for a good LOW RECOIL rifle above .22

There isn't any one thing my AK does really well but it does do everything I ask of it without fail.
A very good AK definition. :)

They're not built for long range, but I can get a different gun for long range.
I think that AR clones are pretty OK with ranges viable for DMR. 1 - 2 MOA with good ammo is not unusual, and it means that the rifle should be able to hit a man sized target at some 600m consistently. But the ammo quality is a very important factor. And the recoil of .223 Rem is definitely much lower than 7.62x39. I was shooting CZ527 rifles chambered in .223 and 7.62x39 round and there was a significant difference.

So if it's just for plinking, I'd consider starting with AR. I also believe that the NATO milsurp ammo you can get is generally of better quality than the Soviet milsurp ammo. I have no experience with 5.56 NATO milsurp, but for example German 7.62 NATO is quite good and makes very consistent groups. The 5.56 NATO will be about the same quality I guess.
 
I see a lot of suggestions for .223... OP specifically stated one of the uses will be deer/big game. Check your local laws and see what the minimum is, cause .223 may not be legal for hunting what you want to hunt.

I personally agree that your best bet is to shoot with an eye patch until you can train the right eye to do the job well, or learn to shoot lefty. Then the recoil issue you are having will be moot.
 
Well in that case, get a Vz.58 instead.
I'm affraid vz. 58 is not a low recoil gun. At least in 7.62x39. CSA already started to make .223 clones but I'm not sure if these are shipped to USA. However they claim that the gun will shoot 37mm groups on 100 m and 80mm on 200m which sounds good enough.
There is a link but it's only in czech.
http://www.sa58.cz/products/sa-vz-58-e-sporter-5-56x45-mm/
The site has a lot of accessories for vz. 58, too.
 
If the AR platform interests you, the AR15 in 300Blackout might be a good compromise. 7.62 caliber while still staying in the AR15 form. Its capable for hunting even larger game under 200yards, and recoil is not very much. I've shot my AR15 in 223 side by side with my roomate's AR15 in 300blackout and it had a softer recoil.

Support and availability is pretty common, except for ammo which is mostly available online. Pick up a couple of hundred rounds while you are not shooting. In case you want to go back to a .22 caliber, its as simple as switching the barrel, or separate upper recevier is you have the funds.

An AK is great, but depending on the brand, it can get heavy on weight. I could barely shoot a few rounds on my friend's Centrury AK without getting tired and having to put the rifle down every once in a while. Could be a consideration to think about.
 
5.7 - PS90 or AR Upper in 5.7

5.45 - AR-15 or AK74 (much less recoil than a AK47)

5.45 is essentially the cheapest center fire rifle round you can find.
 
One afterthought - since the problem seems to be a dominant eye on the wrong side, what about to fix the scope mount somehow, so the shooter can hold the rifle as comfortable, and still look through the scope with his dominant eye.
I believe I heard that Russians do use some side mounts with an additional rail on a side, and they have a red dot on the side rail and scope on the upper spot and they use different eyes to look through the scope and the red dot.
Now I don't know if this is really true. Maybe the guy who was explaining the idea was just pulling my leg. But indeed I have seen some AK mounts designed like that and it does make some sense. So, try to consider this.
Something like that.
If you can get similar stuff for other rifles (M14?) and put the scope on the side rail, then you might be able to use the left eye to look through the scope.
 
I agree with all of you about shooting left handed, but it can't happen.

I don't have the time, money or space to shoot everyday, but I shoot once every week.

You can dry fire hundreds of rounds every evening in your home for free. This is the only way anyone can afford to become really proficient regardless of which way we shoot or which eye is dominate.

Learn how to shoot left handed, and for gods sake don't even think about trying to close one eye. God gave you 2 for a reason and I cannot think of a single good reason to use only half of your vision for any activity.
 
Simple solution---wear glasses with the left lense occluded,masked,covered(whatever you want to call it). After a short period, you'll find it works quite well. My daughter is a lefty with right eye dominance and this easily solved her shooting difficulties. Works much better with a scope but does work with open sights/shotgun.
Option 2 if your right eye is severely challenged is an offset scope mount. I designed one of these for a right handed lady who lost vision in her right eye. It makes the rifle somewhat unhandy but allows right shoulder/left eye shooting.
I've had 12 years of experience solving shooter vision challenges and have had success in each case.
 
Eye patch

I see this has already been suggested, and it may not work with your condition, but I've used a right eye patch turkey hunting for several years now. I am extremely right eye dominant and of course many times the turkey wants to come in on my right side which would require a left handed shot or a lot of movement to get into position for a right handed shot. Solution: eyepatch over right eye. When turkey comes in from right, I can usually flip down the eye patch without getting spotted, and I'm all set for a left handed shot. Killed 3 turkeys so far with this method that I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have gotten otherwise.
 
Normally SHTF gets a snicker from me, but in your case it could be the clear reason to where you want to go - learn to shoot left handed. If you're really worried about that scenario, you want the ability to use any gun, any time. Any of the crutches like cross-over shooting, off-set scope or patch over the left eye to train your right eye won't help you when your fancy set-up breaks or you are out of ammo for your gun. Get an AR15, spend the winter dry training, and by spring your muscles won't even remember that weird right handed shooting.
 
If you are left eye dominant and right handed you will find it is easier to learn how to shoot left handed.
I disagree. If you shoot like you are you will never be a competitive shooter. It just wont work with rifles. It will work with shotguns and some odd looking extra equipment though.

I don't have the time, money or space to shoot everyday, but I shoot once every week.
Shooting once a week is a lot. It may not seem like it on this forum, but on this forum the regulars are pretty much all in the top 1% of shooters as far as money/time put into the sport(not saying skill). Or they are totally full of crap. I have shot rifles, pistols, and shotguns in amateur competitions and I am on the extreme low end of the regulars here. Either way, I wouldn't use what you see here as a judge of normal shooter behavior or how much you need to be shooting to be good. Once a week is plenty. If you dry fire another day a week for 20 minutes you will be in very good shape. As much as you are shooting my guess is that within one month you will have decided learning to shoot lefty was a good idea and you will be shooting much much better with in two. In six months you will be able to show up to local competitions and at least not be in last place, probably do decent. Assuming you practice correctly.
If you won't heed the advice, then an eyepatch/obscured lense is the solution. The offset systems have come up before and other places and they do not work well for rifles like they do for shotguns. THink about how much target shooters put into getting the scope low to the bore. Now think about moving it 4 inches to the left.

"Eyebrow, yes, but i get too close to the scope so it whacks me most shots. unpleasant, but not painful unless I do it a couple hundred times"
I highly recommend you not allow this to happen. Use to set up the scope correctly or buy a decent scope with enough relief. There are very cheap scopes for the 556 that will work fine($50). It may not be painful, but i seriously doubt you can do this without it effecting your shot(flinching). Your mind can't know something will be coming back and hitting around your eye without it trying to pre-empt the contact. Claim what you want, but I won;t believe it.

If the AR platform interests you, the AR15 in 300Blackout might be a good compromise.
I agree, except that it won't be a compromise. I don't have one, but for what almost all civilians are using their ARS for the 300 blackout really performs a lot better than 223. With "everyone" owning an AR now I expect to seem them used a lot more for hunting and for how most of us hunt the 300 is great and it will get cheaper if it grows causing more growth.
I would only get an AR if you either want to make a real target rifle out of it OR you want to buy multiple uppers for it. Keep in mind that if you buy uppers for different things the lower will not be specialized for them. For instance if you have one 223 upper for competition shooting it will have a target trigger and if you have one 300 blackout for hunting and home defense that taget trigger will not be the best option, so most end up getting multiple lowers also and don't utilize the modularity all that much(the lower is cheap compared to the upper, accessories and optics).
I have not seen anyone, including people who compete with ARs at Camp Perry with an AR set-up I really liked as far as cheek weld. Most say it is very important for accurate shooting. I shot my AR better than my Garand because of the low recoil, but I hated the cheek weld on it and it negatively affected my shooting.

You don't walk to around in the hunting woods with an AK ... trust me!
To be frank there will be some people who will not invite you back hunting if you show up with an AK. Less so with an AR that is set-up for hunting. Maybe you won't want to hunt with them anyways, but most of us are desperate for land access. I had a land owner tell me they MIGHT let me hunt coyote on their land if I use my muzzle loader. I will probably go for it if they come back saying yes.

My suggestion:
Get a 03 FFL(C&R), then buy an SKS and a few bolt guns in various cartridges. You can get some cheap sporting stock for SKSs that make them a lot less tactical. Play around with them a bit, find out which you like and get it set-up for your needs. At least they will all come with decent sights.

Alternatives I do not know much about that come to mind:
1. the 5.7 as other stated, but I think ammo is expensive and same problems as the 223 for hunting at range and legal limitation
2. the 7.62X25- Some semi-auto carbines available for it. There have been some bolt guns at different times available on the used market. Still the cheapest centerfire out there I think. Ballistics not too far off from 22 mag or 5.7. The cheap surplus is corrosive.
 
Last edited:
I think it is fairly easy to mount a scope off to the left side of a top eject Winchester lever gun. It might be pricy, but M1 Garands and old Springfield/Enfield rifles also mounted scopes to the left to allow for loading.
 
lite recoil

if you want a lite recoil rifle that is a stopper and good form home defense and a hoot to shoot think about a 30 cal M1 Carbine. lite weight low recoil accurate. I like mine, and my granddaughters like to shoot them because of there weight and recoil. Ammo can be found easyly or reload you own. A copy of the M1 Carbine will cost aout the same as a AR or AK. (http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/...California+Approved+.30+Carbine+Rifle+wWalnut). I tried to add a link to buds, last price for a M1 carbine was $623.00
 
Last edited:
I am left handed and right eye dominant. When I decided to begin shooting skeet on a regular basis, I also found it easier to stay with my right eye dominance and switch to shooting my Citori right handed. I can now shoot pretty well right handed, shooting a 25 out of 25 every now and again at skeet. I say try and switch shoulders for a few weeks and see how it goes. It only took me a few weeks to get comfortable shooting right handed. Good luck!
 
Another +1 learn to shoot left handed. Spend lots of time dry firing or "dry handling/aiming" in your living room, with empty magazine of course. I was going to +1 the M1 Carbine suggestion, excellent in the HD/SD role, but see part of the OP's criteria is mid-size/deer game. Like the .223, yes the .30 Carbine "can" do it, doesn't mean you should--unless you absolutely gotta. So:
+1. .357 Lever - Rossi 92 or older Marlin, not Win 94.
+1. 7.62x39 - SKS or my preference, Mini 30, higher cap and quick change stick mags than SKS, more PC-looking than AK (see other posts' hunting comments)
- .30-30 lever - older Marlin 336 or Win 94 - but only if the intended use skews more toward hunting use versus SD-specific. The .30-30 can do yeoman duty in that area too, it's just there are better (see above, the nearly same x39 besting it due to combo of capacity and rapid fire capability. The OP said <100 yards for "deer," and this is where the .357 excels--matching .30-30 performance (w/in that range) while lower recoil and higher capacity, making it better in the HD/SD role.
The more I think about this--the Mini 30 is looking more and more to be a winner. Aforementioned cheap ammo, more ergonomic (loading/unloading) than SKS, + with its mini-Garand appearance more PC than either AK or AR. Unless you're a rangemeister, where accuracy-cometition is the key goal (in which case get a .223 AR) its at least minute-of-critter accuracy should certainly suffice for most duty.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top