List of Companies Refusing to Sell to Anti-Gun States

I can assure you that I will never again consider purchase of a Ruger product. Memories of these things should be indefinate
Click to expand...
Bill Ruger died several years ago. I've spoken to several Ruger representatives, and the company has distanced itself from his sentiments.

Some of their highest-selling firearms, such as the SR9, the P95, the Mini-14, and their AR-15 are designed and marketed as standard-capacity firearms.
 
All i am saying is that if some manufacturers stop supplying to government agencies others will be queuing to take their places. It might be a temporary inconvenience to some agencies but that's all.
Click to expand...

It is a smart move by the companies participating in the refusal.
It highlights which firearms companies care about the second amendment which will proved a long term branding and goodwill benefit to those companies.
 
I am glad to see Gov't agencies hurting like we are, frankly.

They need to remember who provides their paychecks, as do the manufacturers.

They make a ton more money off civies than they do the gov't.

STAND AND FIGHT,

NOW!
 
Gotta agree with the above sentiment that the major players that supply the majority of police and military gear are not amongst the lists of boycotters. Most are at best ancillary suppliers, not contractual suppliers, and the ones with contracts aren't going to risk loss of the contracts or countersuits for breech of contracts.
 
Beretta looks to be joining the club soon. Owner is fed up with continuing Maryland troubles. Moved their warehouse to VA last time gun laws reared up there. Now they are thinking of moving and plant managers says Berettas do not bluff.
 
In support of same, I personaly have quit spending money I don't absoultly have to in states that support gun control. My few dollars and those of the folks that agree with me might make a difference.
 
Beretta looks to be joining the club soon. Owner is fed up with continuing Maryland troubles. Moved their warehouse to VA last time gun laws reared up there. Now they are thinking of moving and plant managers says Berettas do not bluff.
Click to expand...

Beretta has threatened to leave, but they are not refusing to sell to anyone or threatening to refuse to sell to anyone. There is a big difference.

Plus the proposed changes in Maryland's law have a very real liability impact potential. As a gun manufacturer, Beretta would become liable for shipping and selling firearms which opens them up, under law, to additional liabilities. So there would be a very real financial reason to move...so they would not just be moving out of protest, but because it is the fiscally smart thing to do.

Never mind how much of what they make would be illegal in the state it is manufactured.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top