The glaring flaw in your argument here is that DanThaMan1776 is not a member of Law Enforcement. If he was, I would have recommended 00 buckshot to him.
Don't know what LE vs. civilian has to do with the effeciency of low recoil 00 buck--- which is produced for the civilian market as well as LE. Seems the intended use for both is the same.
One's called Tactical. One isn't. Both have plated shot with FliteControl wad and are ballistically identical.
Yes, I know, for indoor use there are some who'd go to smaller shot to reduce penetration while also reducing effectiveness--but that's another issue.
Possible useful info for those still on the thread.
BUCK from 18" cyl bore using ProChrono digital.
Fed. Tac. low recoil---------- 1160fps
Win Ranger------------------ 1107 (lead)
Fed Classic 00----------------- 1300 (approx)
NOTE: Hornady TAP also uses the FliteControl wad, but with 00 lead buck. Same tight patterns, but 2 rds. out of 8 failed to release shot and went into tgt. with the wad. That's with cyl. bore. With IC bbl, no issues. (pressure issue at muzzle?)
I'm sure the lead wants to stick together more so than the Fed's. plated.
I read where Fed. was designing a tactical version where the buck was designed not to release. That'd be quite the "bowling pin" effect upon impact.
SLUGS
Fed. Tac--------------------------------------1236
Ranger---------------------------------------1193
Fed. Classic----------------------------------1495
Rottweil Brenneke 1 0z.---------------------1372 (kinda in between low recoil and standard)
I hope the added info is at least interesting, if not useful.
Last edited: