Let's ban California

When it gets bad enough I will lay down supressing fire and fall back in an orderly manner toward the state of arizona or nevada.
 
Lets just not stop with Kalifornia, Lets do away with Washington DC also. A lot of losers there for sure :rolleyes:

------------------
We preserve our freedoms by using four boxes: soap,ballot,jury, and cartridge.
Anonymous
 
For something from the mainstream press, here's an item that oughta provide food for thought: http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/07/09/stifgnusa02005.html

Were I a good bit younger, I'd do some serious planning for me and my family. I've read enough from other sources that I give this one some credibility.

As it is, living in "Aztlan" as I do, I'm getting a bit of a hostile attitude against this BS.

And we're talking about folks who don't care about the Bill of Rights as we understand it. You think you have hassles about guns, now? Think about your kids and grandkids!

The problem isn't really about guns, though. It's about a political philosophy which for us is not statist, but for "them", is. And you young folks have got to get beyond the idea that voting, letter-writing and a $50 donation to some candidate is anywhere near "I've done my duty" as a citizen.

Regards, Art

[This message has been edited by Art Eatman (edited July 09, 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Art Eatman (edited July 09, 2000).]
 
Time to divvy up the State of Kali: North (to include most of the southern Sierra Nevada Mountain Range & the Valley), South (virtually anything south of the Grapevine) and Coastal (liberal SF Bay Area Region). The North will be very pro-gun and conservative. The Coastal can be formed into it's own republic (since Berkeley and SF think they are anyway), and as for the South, we can give it back to Mexico. Viva Fox!
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>as for the South, we can give it back to Mexico. Viva Fox![/quote]

Given to Mexico??? :eek: What did those people every do to you?!?

Mexico deserves better.

pax

"Politics should be limited in scope to war, protection of property, and the occasional precautionary beheading of a member of the ruling class." -- P.J. O'Rourke
 
California has over 80% of a lot of the natural resources (metals, minerals, etc.) that the U.S. needs/uses and provides a very large percentage of our agricultural products. Plus, it's a beautiful place. I'd rather go take it over and ban the liberals. Don't let them scare us away from one of the most beautiful and bountiful places in the U.S.
Someone once told me they hated Ca. and it was ugly and nasty. I asked them if they had ever been there. "Yeah, I flew into LAX on my way to Hawaii."
Well, DUH!
LAX doesn't represent the entire state of California :rolleyes:
(and the politics of LA and San Francisco don't always represent the people who live there).
Let's just ban the liberals and reclaim Ca. :)

[This message has been edited by CindyH (edited July 09, 2000).]
 
Give southern kali. back to Mexico...where have you guys been...mexico came accross the rio grande decades ago and took it back. And they don't have to show you no stinken badges either...gringos...heeeh! :D
 
Back
Top