Leo's shoot ANOTHER unarmed man.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I finally get it. We need to take the following drastic actions immediately.

1. Suspend all police chases until a Mental Health Data Base can be set up to determine by radio communications that any fleeing suspect is not mentally deficient.

2. Pass new laws immediatley so that anyone deemed mentally deficient can walk into any retail establishment and take goods or services without paying for them and come back later to settle up.

3. Allow anyone one deemded mentally deficient to flee from the scene of a crime and do not prosecute them unless they turn themselves in.

I'm sorry I forgot that in this new enlightened age truth and justice are always relative and up to the Trial Lawyers association to determine as they see fit when they see fit.

I stand by my guns. If the guy can't function in society like the rest of us, he does not need to drive.

I am going bald. Tough: I can't be a hair model.

I am short. Tough: I can't play pro basketball.

I have Southern drawl. Tough: I can't be a TV announcer.

I have a terrible golf game. Tough: I can't play in the British Open.

My teeth are yellow. Tough: I can't star in toothpaste commercials.

Life is not fair. This guy had no business driving. If he could not even determine that he needed to pay for gas then what makes any of you think he could make a rational call when forced to do so in Chicago traffic?

This is is what happens when a bunch of feel-good liberals try to solve the world's problems by lowering the bar.


------------------
"When guns are outlawed;I will be an outlaw."

[This message has been edited by Will Beararms (edited August 05, 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Will Beararms (edited August 05, 2000).]
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by LawDog:
WTF2?

First off, bub, ...

You see, bub, ...

Secondly, my previous post was merely to point out your misconceptions ...

Thirdly, if the format of my reply is somehow insulting to you, WTF?

To date, you are the only person in the hundreds of replies I have made to take offense.

Granted, it wasn't one of my most eloquent works, but it damn sure doesn't deserve your hissy fit.

I don't know who put sand in your Post Toasties, me bucko, but I suggest you take it up with them and not me.

LawDog

[This message has been edited by LawDog (edited August 05, 2000).]
[/quote]


If you can't see why I might be offended by your attitude and words directed at me, I guess I should not have been surprised in your first post.

This name calling, twisting the words I used, and the subtle implications are not taking the HighRoad that normaly occurs on TFL.

It appears you think I am the only one you offended with the tone of your first message. I think you might well be wrong.

I tell you that your words offend me, and you just chew me out and start the name calling. That sure doesn't solve anything.

If you still wonder why my impression of Leos has dropped yet another notch, you might consider reading the entire above thread again from a civilians point of view.

Sprig
 
I'm with you Sprig. See a thread (which I imagine will be locked soon as it is a dupe) in GenDis Titled "Police unfairly attacked for doing their job" ....say _*WHAT*_!!!??

I thought the topic could have been more appropriatly titled "Punk @$$ cop gets his (in jail)"

Unfairly attacked!? Doing their job!? I guess that's why the punk cop in question turned himself in on murder charges.

From that article it sounds like there were shots fired before they even made the stop or at least well before they decided they no option but to kill him. They were trying to "shoot out his tires" for crissakes! A little trick they picked up from the movies I guess.

Please try to justify a three dept vehicular chase, roadblocks, a hail of bullets going who-knows-where on the highway, and finally taking a man's life over a tank of stolen gas.

Shoot. Can you blame a guy for trying to get away like his life depends on it? Not anymore, because it might!

Lawdog: No Sprig is not the only one you've rubbed wrong in hundreds of posts... it's just that I've never bothered to speak up... I don't think you can hit "submit reply" without saying something that bothers me.

Moderators, please stop stroking this "we're all on the same team" notion.. We OBVIOUSLY are not! This new breed of cops are the enemy's strong arm.
 
Ah, the fog clears. I hadn't realized that you had an agenda, Sprig.

Any more comments, please use my e-mail.

LawDog
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by LawDog:
Ah, the fog clears. I hadn't realized that you had an agenda, Sprig.
LawDog
[/quote]

Well, thats interesting. I didn't realize I had an agenda either. Care to tell me what it is? (Or what you think it is?)

I started this with NO ill feelings. I started by saying that I wasn't picking on you, and I chose your post just because of the way you authored it.

Your comments offended me. I suspect those same comments also offend others and drive a further wedge between Leos and civilians. Mentioning this promptly gets me chewed out in your next post along with a bunch of childish name calling.

Now I am accused of having some sort of agenda.

You know, twice now you have had the chance to try work out the disagreement, and instead you have furthered the attacks. I tell you that it seems you are driving that wedge in deeper, and every time you come back and drive that wedge in even deeper.

I don't get it.

Sprig
 
All of you missed one statement in a post that changes the whole thing-Post by bill p.
"A Chenoa officer was waitng at Smith's mobile home to queitly arrest him. "
THE CHASE WAS NOT NESSARY.A OFFICER WAS WAITiNG AT HIS HOUSE.WE HAVE NO COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OFFICERS.THIS WAS A GLORY CHASE TO MAKE SOME HEADLINES.A MAN WAS KILLED FOR NOTHING.


------------------
Bob--- Age and deceit will overcome youth and speed.
I'm old and deceitful.

[This message has been edited by beemerb (edited August 05, 2000).]
 
This thread appears to be degenerating to emotional speculation and as such has lost sight of its informative value; ergo it is closed. Any further passionate discourse is to be taken to email ONLY!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top