Key Bush backers rally to Fred Thompson

xd9fan

New member
Key Bush backers rally to Fred Thompson

By: Mike Allen
Jun 4, 2007 02:22 PM EST
Fred Thompson with supporters
Fred Thompson has signed on high-profile supporters.


George P. Bush, a nephew of President Bush, has contributed to the prospective presidential campaign of Fred Thompson and signed an e-mail asking friends and associates to do the same, The Politico has learned.

"In a field of candidates without a clear favorite among our fellow Republicans, my sincere hope is that you consider joining us in this effort to encourage Fred to run," the e-mail says.

The involvement of a Bush family member highlights a stream of former Bush-Cheney aides and supporters who are signing on with Thompson, in some cases quietly. Thompson, the "Law & Order" actor and former Tennessee senator, filed papers Friday that allowed him to begin raising money. Aides say he remains on track to formally announce his candidacy the week of the Fourth of July, although they say no date is set in stone.
Fred Thompson

* Fred Thompson will run, advisers say
* Thompson discloses cancer amid rumors
* 'Law & Order' and lobbying

Mary Matalin, the former counselor to Vice President Cheney, says she will be advising Thompson. A campaign source says she will be an unpaid adviser. Matalin is friends with Thompson and his wife, Jeri, and her involvement began informally, the source says.

Advisers say the head of economic policy for Thompson's fledgling team will be Lawrence B. Lindsey, who was President Bush's first economic policy adviser and an architect of his tax cuts. Lindsey was chief economic adviser to Bush's first presidential campaign and is a former member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Lindsey will also have a hand in the campaign's broader policy formulation, sources say.

The head of domestic policy is to be David M. McIntosh, a lawyer and former congressman from Indiana who was an official in the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, according to the sources. The chief foreign policy adviser will be chosen soon, the sources say.

Adding to the Bush-Cheney ties, the campaign has said that the chief operating officer will be Thomas J. Collamore, a former aide to the older Bush when he was vice president and also an official in the Reagan administration.

And Michael Turk, e-campaign director for George W. Bush's reelection campaign, will take a leave of absence from his current job with the National Cable & Telecommunications Association to assist in getting the Thompson website off the ground. He may continue in a webmaster capacity for the campaign.

George P. Bush, the chief operating officer of a real estate development firm in Fort Worth, Texas, sent the appeal Friday afternoon along with Timothy P. Berry, the firm's president. The e-mail closes "Devotedly," then has both of their signatures.
 
I was looking positively at Thompson until this. THe LAST thing he needs is help from Bush; that is unless he wants to loose.
 
I saw this guy on c-span the other day and from what I saw, he is saying the same things that Bush has been saying about the Iraq war. Most people are going to see Bush #3 once they hear Thompson speak about the war, I think. Nominating him is a bad idea if he is going to keep doing this.
 
Thompson speaks well, he's the only real conservative, and sorry, he's closer to Reagan than to Bush. I've not yet seen him endorse anything similar to the Bush plans. He wants to secure the border, and is pro-2A.

Are you just poking at Republicans?
 
No I'm saying that FDT doesn't seem to want to distance himself from GW's Iraq plan (from what I saw at least). That's a good way to guarantee himself a loss.
 
That's exactly what I mean. If he wants to say no to 70% of the population, he can go ahead and do it. It is really going to hurt him in 08 though.
 
I'm all for a surrender date. Hope he sets one if he gets elected. It'll show he's grounded in reality which would be a nice change of pace. But we'll likely be on the way out before the next election anyhow.
 
THe LAST thing he needs is help from Bush; that is unless he wants to loose.

I can't help but think of this one South Park episode where the Chef (named "Chef") accused the town flag of being racist. Some townspeople were for changing the flag, to be progressive, while others were against it, for the sake of tradition. So one night, the traditionalists talked the KKK into backing the progressives.

The Klansmen asked, "now why would we want to support something that goes against what we believe in? We want to keep the racist flag."

"Because anything you support, everyone else will be against."

"Good point."

Just because Bush's people are backing FDT doesn't mean FDT asked for their backing.
 
By the way, what is Thompsons position on tax cuts? If I had to guess I'd say he wants them cut even more and then axe everything else.
 
b22, did you last post have a point?

You linked three articles.

Article number one indicates a guy appointe by Bush is leaving his post to possibly campaign for Thompson. The individual in question was a recess appointment by Bush and the article is a clear leftist leaning article. Recess appointments are not illegal and when you have a DNC organized to oppose appointments there is no reason for the President to not make use of recess appointments. How this ties into Thompson and the rule of law is a mystery to me.

Article number two discusses his 40 year old wife. So Thompson has a younger wife. This would be a woman he married 10 years after being divorced (like 50% of all marriages in America). It goes on to say his Ex may even campaign for him. You may not like his having a younger wife but that does not mean he is anti-family values, whatever that means. My wifes uncle did not marry until he was 53 and married a girl who was 32. That is a big difference but it is no different than his father. Personally I prefer a closer age gap in my relations but it is not like Thompson went and married an 18 year old beauty school student. She was a fully grown adult and they made their own decision. I don't know why you have a problem with it.

Article number three is an anti-Thompson hit piece that claims he is lazy because he hasn't jumped into the fray yet. I would say that is a rather smart move. Until the delayed announcement of Thompson came up people were griping about how early this garbage started. Now when someone doesn't start early it is because he is lazy. Why jump in early to get bloodied wher the current Rep morons are more than happy to gut each other. Sit back, learn their weaknesses and then come in and win. Seems smart to me.

If you want to attack Thompson do some effort and attack him on valid points. If he is a "Stay the Course" guy in the mold of Bush in Iraq then pound him on that. Do not though resort to tripe.
 
Okay. It's one thing to like a certain candidate, but it's a whole different ___game to hate on all the others.

I respect and kind of like Ron Paul. But I like Fred Thompson more. Doesn't mean that every other thing I say about Ron Paul is going to be RP-bashing.

That's how Kerry lost. One entire campaign of Bush-bashing.
 
How this ties into Thompson and the rule of law is a mystery to me.
I guess you don't know too much about Tim Griffin huh?

Tim Griffin, formerly right hand man to Karl Rove, resigned Thursday as US Attorney for Arkansas hours after BBC Television ‘Newsnight’ reported that Congressman John Conyers requested the network’s evidence on Griffin’s involvement in ‘caging voters.’ Greg Palast, reporting for BBC Newsnight, obtained a series of confidential emails from the 2004 Bush-Cheney campaign. In these emails, Griffin, then the GOP Deputy Communications Director, transmitted so-called ‘caging lists’ of voters to state party leaders.
http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=249876

Appointed to succeed US Attorney Bud Cummins under a previously little-known provision of the PATRIOT Act, Griffin could have served indefinitely without Senate confirmation.
Griffin's appointment drew attention to the PATRIOT Act modification during the controversy about dismissed U.S. attorneys
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Griffin

And once it became clear that he would undergo a hearing, why did Griffin sideline himself with the colorful observation that undergoing Senate confirmation would be "like volunteering to stand in front of a firing squad in the middle of a three-ring circus?"
http://www.slate.com/id/2167284/pagenum/all/


I'll just agree to disagree with you on the other things I posted, I'm sure you can figure out why I said what I said about those things and why I think they are bad things.

Okay. It's one thing to like a certain candidate, but it's a whole different ___game to hate on all the others.

I respect and kind of like Ron Paul. But I like Fred Thompson more. Doesn't mean that every other thing I say about Ron Paul is going to be RP-bashing.
I'm just trying to point out why I think FDT would not be a good choice for president, this really has nothing to do with RP. I don't respect or like FDT and I think I should be allowed to say it, I wouldn't have a problem if you did it in a RP thread, I would just attempt to prove you wrong.
 
I don't really see much difference between Thompson and Obama really, they both equal business as usual in washington imho. Business as usual to me means working towards fascism (R) or communism (D). We need drastic change I believe, the only people offering this are people like Paul and Kucinich.

OT: Republican debate in 15 minutes on CNN
 
I knew i wasn't the only one that sat back in my chair and chuckled at the many levels of meaning and humor in placing Paul and Kucinich in the same sentence. They're similar and dissimilar in so many ways.
 
I don't think it would be a good idea to elect Kucinich but he does have a few good ideas like getting out of NAFTA and WTO, getting rid of patriot act, department of peace, impeaching cheney, getting out of iraq, protecting the environment and ending the drug war. I'm sure you can figure which ideas of his are bad... the main reason I compared the two are because they both offer massive change. We need change badly but I don't think Kucinich is the best person to do it. I think you all know who I want to win.
 
Back
Top