Keltec p32 vs p3AT

[adamBomb]

I ended up getting to the range after all. Put 50 rounds through it. No problems. Was accurate at 25ft, which was as far as I tested it. Recoil was similar to the glock 43. I didnt think it was as bad as I thought and I could of easily put 200 rounds through it.

 

[Cheapshooter]

I thought they discontinued the Superfly. That was my first DeSantis I bought for my Elsie Pea. Still use it, but it's worn a bit. All except the fly part. Never used it past the first outing. I didn't like back pocket carry. Sitting on my gun wasn't what I would call comfortable, or convenient. In the front pocket, the fly just got in the way of grasping the gun to draw.

 

[njr]

I have fired a keltec .32, a keltec PF9 and a glock 42. Of all of them, I like the g42 best for me it was extremely accurate, single hole magazine groups at 10 yds/ hit you in the eyeball every single shot. The price is a bit high for such a small gun, but its seriously a rrrrrreally nice gun. For me the keltec .32 wasn't nearly as accurate but not bad, the keltec feels cheaper and it is cheaper, by about 200 dollars or more, but it has aluminum frame rails with a steel slide riding on them. The glock is very small. Easily the size of a wallet, keltec only a tiny bit smaller.

I like the PF9 but does have some recoil, and a heavy trigger, and aluminum frame rails

I would get the smith shield or glock43. You should be able to find a used glock 42 very lightly used if you really want that.

 

[marie1]

For carry I prefer kel-tec p3AT. And it has the option for a belt clip. And I can conceal it beneath/underneath scrubs to walk to the car from work in the event last year of some oppression against me involving people (and the only place I did not carry it was the church, which had visible protection of angels God would not allow evil to occur in his House). And it shoot the 380 cartridge. And accuracy is poor but if is single stack small and lightweight/ideal for discreet carry. And it was less than the ruger .