Other calibers also KB. Do a search on my user name for a description of a KB in a G19.
Yes, other brands do KB.
In 1911's, KB's weren't very common until IPSC shooters started hotroding the .38 Super. Previously, when most 1911's were in .45, KB's were rare. Even when gunsmiths got real aggressive in throating barrels and leaving a lot unsupported chamber, there weren't a lot of KB's.
After Rob Leatham popularized the Super for IPSC, there were a number of occurances of "Super Face." Gunsmiths started using fully supported barrels, and the problem has pretty much gone away.
There are a number of factors that seem to contribute to KB's.
- Unsupported chambers
- Ability to fire out of battery
- Polygonal rifling and lead bullets
- Bullet set back
- Over charges
I am sure that there are others. These conditions aren't unique to Glocks. There are any number of pistols that can experience one or more of these conditions.
AFAIK, there has been no scientific study done that can provide us with any evidence. All we have are anecdotes. To make any kind of generalizations based on anecdotal evidence would be very foolish.
Oracle stated:
"Whenever I've read serious study of a Glock kB (and some other brand kB's) with .40 S&W ammo, it's been determined that the cartridge was either double-charged, or that the bullet may have been set back to far in the case."
And:
"I think those two reasons are the cause of most of the kB's (overpressure rounds due to double charge or bullet setback), that's the closest thing to a "unified theory of Glock kB's that I've seen."
I have asked the question before, and I'll ask it again:
How, after the fact, can it be determined that a round was double charged, or that there was bullet set back?
I maintain that after the round has been fired, determining either one of these two conditions is impossible. The bullet is gone, the case is blown. An after the fact examination is going to tell you there was a double charge or bullet set back? Hogwash.
Yes, other brands do KB.
In 1911's, KB's weren't very common until IPSC shooters started hotroding the .38 Super. Previously, when most 1911's were in .45, KB's were rare. Even when gunsmiths got real aggressive in throating barrels and leaving a lot unsupported chamber, there weren't a lot of KB's.
After Rob Leatham popularized the Super for IPSC, there were a number of occurances of "Super Face." Gunsmiths started using fully supported barrels, and the problem has pretty much gone away.
There are a number of factors that seem to contribute to KB's.
- Unsupported chambers
- Ability to fire out of battery
- Polygonal rifling and lead bullets
- Bullet set back
- Over charges
I am sure that there are others. These conditions aren't unique to Glocks. There are any number of pistols that can experience one or more of these conditions.
AFAIK, there has been no scientific study done that can provide us with any evidence. All we have are anecdotes. To make any kind of generalizations based on anecdotal evidence would be very foolish.
Oracle stated:
"Whenever I've read serious study of a Glock kB (and some other brand kB's) with .40 S&W ammo, it's been determined that the cartridge was either double-charged, or that the bullet may have been set back to far in the case."
And:
"I think those two reasons are the cause of most of the kB's (overpressure rounds due to double charge or bullet setback), that's the closest thing to a "unified theory of Glock kB's that I've seen."
I have asked the question before, and I'll ask it again:
How, after the fact, can it be determined that a round was double charged, or that there was bullet set back?
I maintain that after the round has been fired, determining either one of these two conditions is impossible. The bullet is gone, the case is blown. An after the fact examination is going to tell you there was a double charge or bullet set back? Hogwash.