Then why was it done? Very few people prefer the front loading tube. I am quite certain it cuts manufacturing costs. Henry is quite good about replying to e-mail inquiries, and I believe they have read supposed replies from them in the past on this issue citing cost. The loading gate adds a few parts and cuts and the front loading system adds almost nothing. I guess if it is a matter of contention I could send them an e-mail and see how they reply.It wasn't actually done to cut costs, referencing an earlier thread where that idea was discussed.