Just for a change of pace, let's discuss some GOOD things about Taurus.
I don't own any of them (probably won't ever) BUT a few friends of mine have had pretty good luck with some of their revolvers. (But one had a lemon too.)
Also, I feel that they do make SOME models that are/should be given credit as "decent" handguns. The models that come to mind are:
The Judge: IMHO a novelty but they seem to work reliably and they definitely sell alot of them. (Even if the gun is bad, the marketing is good.) They do look kinda fun as a toy.
24/7 OSS: Actually handled one of these and the ergos felt good. It was submitted for a go-nowhere military .45 pistol contract test and I think did okay. I would probably trust one myself after 500rds of no problems. (Still not my first pick though.)
Taurus 92: A close copy of the Beretta 92. IIRC early ones were even made on Beretta machinery. Plus the decocker is IMHO in a better location.
PT1911: While everyone under the sun has a 1911 variant, this one seems well made (better than SOME others in the price range) and it's hard to screw up a 1911, I would say if you get one for the right money, go for it.
Some other good things about Taurus, is they (if nothing else) are willing to try new concepts and produce new models to keep an updated catalog. Actually, product quality and market release can vary BUT at least they try, instead of being stationary.
Anyone else with anything positive to say about Taurus?
I don't own any of them (probably won't ever) BUT a few friends of mine have had pretty good luck with some of their revolvers. (But one had a lemon too.)
Also, I feel that they do make SOME models that are/should be given credit as "decent" handguns. The models that come to mind are:
The Judge: IMHO a novelty but they seem to work reliably and they definitely sell alot of them. (Even if the gun is bad, the marketing is good.) They do look kinda fun as a toy.
24/7 OSS: Actually handled one of these and the ergos felt good. It was submitted for a go-nowhere military .45 pistol contract test and I think did okay. I would probably trust one myself after 500rds of no problems. (Still not my first pick though.)
Taurus 92: A close copy of the Beretta 92. IIRC early ones were even made on Beretta machinery. Plus the decocker is IMHO in a better location.
PT1911: While everyone under the sun has a 1911 variant, this one seems well made (better than SOME others in the price range) and it's hard to screw up a 1911, I would say if you get one for the right money, go for it.
Some other good things about Taurus, is they (if nothing else) are willing to try new concepts and produce new models to keep an updated catalog. Actually, product quality and market release can vary BUT at least they try, instead of being stationary.
Anyone else with anything positive to say about Taurus?