44AMP said:I realize that anyone who actually spoke the whole truth would never (in today's world) get far enough for consideration, but I would dearly love to see someone answer this...
That's part of what made Bork's week long hearing so interesting. He explained the law in response to questions roughly as dopey as "How do you reconcile school shootings with a right to an assault weapon?"
He never actually called Sen. Metzenbaum a moron, but he also didn't pretend that the calculated posturing and preening were decent constitutional analysis either. Overall they seemed more civil, but that was pre-Spartacus.
As satisfying as direct answers can be to an audience of you and me, there is no benefit to a nominee in making a senator look like a dope. The closest Kavanaugh came was in response to Sen. Blumenthal's prodding about conversations with anyone about Mueller. It was a bit of comedy Blumenthal clearly didn't enjoy. I can't find a transcript, but it went something like:
Blumenthal: Did you speak with anyone at the XYZ firm about the Mueller investigation.
Kavanaugh: I'm not recalling anything like that. Maybe you could tell me who you have in mind.
Blumenthal: I'm more interested in who YOU have in mind.
Kavanaugh: I definitely didn't discuss it with any of them.
Gallery: Laughter.
Blumenthal: Well, putting comedy aside....
To his credit, Blumenthal seemed embarrassed by the recognition that his question was inane.
Last edited: