J-Frames

I have a S&W 640 and 642 and love both. The 640 is all stainless steel and the 642 is a stainless alloy. I prefer to carry the 642 because of the weight. If you can find one buy it!

I have been trying to find another 642 for 6 months and had no luck. I do not think that there is anyway to lose money on the 642 unless you pay above retail. If you find one and do not want it, let me know.

GOOD LUCK.
 
I actually did carry an S&W 940 for a while. I kept the spare moon clip in a prescription pill bottle meant for 30 of the bigger tablets; the bottle did not have a child-proof cap. I could pop the cap and drop the moon clip right into the cylinder (took some practice). After that I carried a 442 for a while - no moon clip. As I've aged, I've changed from revolver carry to semi in the pocket; arthritis and doodling with a speed loader just don't mix very well.
 
I have two j frames! a 442 and 640. Love them both. The 640 is a 357.

Moonclips are nice in smaller revolvers. They're not as easy in a 7 or 8 rounder like the one pictured in black.
2u3uhe3e.jpg
 
I own a J-Frame (Model 36) and an LCR. I put a Tyler T-Grip on the Smith. I prefer the looks of the 36, but the trigger and sights on the Ruger kicks the Smith in the backside.
 
Ive had a couple of 642's with the lock for a number of years now, and never had any issues with them. They get shot a couple of times a month, and have quite a few rounds through them now. One is a little sloppier than the other now though.

Im kind of "meh" on the locks. Theyre there, who cares, I dont use them, they havent been a problem. The guns work just like the guns that dont have them.

My 642's have been used/shot on a pretty regular basis, and show it. The finish while not ratty, does have character marks. My buddies 442 of the same vintage on the other hand, looks like it was drug behind the truck, and even the slightest wear is much more noticeable and obvious on the black gun.

I had a 940 that used moon clips, and Im kind of "meh" on them too. While they worked, I found the moon clips to be somewhat finicky, and as was mentioned, they had a habit of loosing rounds when kept in your pocket. They also sometimes got tweaked, and loading and extraction, was sometimes difficult. In the 940's case, they were basically needed, with the .38's, I prefer the Safariland Comp 1 type speedloaders. They are more secure, dont lose the rounds unexpectedly, and are fast and easy to use. Not as fast as a good moon clip, but pretty close.

For grips, I use the old school S&W service type grips with a Tyler T grip. You wont get any smaller, and I find this set up is also the most comfortable to shoot with. Not that these guns are comfortable to shoot with mind you.
 
My vote is for the 642. I have a late 90's vintage 642. It has been carried a lot, and the finish has held up nicely. Don't know if they changed it on later models, but I've had absolutely no problem with the finish peeling. It looks almost as good as new.
 
I'd take a standard no-lock (if possible) 442 or 642 and some HKS speedloaders. Moonclips are too delicate for everyday carry. Correct if I'm wrong but current production grips don't accept speedloaders very well. So, I'd also buy a set of Hogue Bantam grips (they work 100% with HKS speedloaders).
 
Back
Top