During the early 30s there was a nation in Europe who made the mistake of electing some really bad people. After those people got in power, they changed the rules so only they could be in power.
Any potential dictator recognizes that and takes steps to ensure their continued rule. If the NRA leaders don't know that bit of history, they seemed to have discovered it on their own.
The opposing side (and you know who they are) seek to have the entire NRA disbanded /dissolved. I see that as the wrong solution. What is needed is replacement of the guilty parties in the NRA administration. Unfortunately those same folks seem to have buggered the bylaws to make that nearly impossible from inside the organization.
It may come down to having to have an outside agency remover them (such as he govt finding them guilty of criminal acts). I'd like to see that done, leaving the NRA as an organization alone and functioning to replace those people.
However that doesn't seem to be the choice we are getting. What I'm seeing is "some people in the NRA did bad things so the entire NRA has to go away".
I don't see that as even remotely fair.
or ethical
Any potential dictator recognizes that and takes steps to ensure their continued rule. If the NRA leaders don't know that bit of history, they seemed to have discovered it on their own.
The opposing side (and you know who they are) seek to have the entire NRA disbanded /dissolved. I see that as the wrong solution. What is needed is replacement of the guilty parties in the NRA administration. Unfortunately those same folks seem to have buggered the bylaws to make that nearly impossible from inside the organization.
It may come down to having to have an outside agency remover them (such as he govt finding them guilty of criminal acts). I'd like to see that done, leaving the NRA as an organization alone and functioning to replace those people.
However that doesn't seem to be the choice we are getting. What I'm seeing is "some people in the NRA did bad things so the entire NRA has to go away".
I don't see that as even remotely fair.
or ethical