Is the kit gun dead?

I resemble that "Old Timer" remark, LOL!!!

From what this Ole Timer remembers, the term "Kit Gun" goes back a lot further than a few decades.

"Kit" was a term used to describe the Gear a man used, to live or "Make a living". Soldiers, Sailors, frontiersman, trappers, miners, cowhands, later outdoorsmen, hikers, campers took up the use of the term.

It was also common in the Victorian era for all travelers to have there established traveling Kit, that among other things would most likely contain smaller "Kits" such as shaving kits, toilet kits, barber kits, and what would become known today as a First Aid Kit.

The common thread amongst such kits was that they contained certain items that the owner considered standard if not essential. So that rather than a random conglomeration of "stuff" a kit would have a known or expected list of gear to satisfy its intended purpose.

Think Gun cleaning "Kit"... The "Kit Gun" was a component of many types of "Kit" but most especially those of the outdoorsmen and soldiers.

Kit guns, in todays vernacular might be more thought of as "Back up" guns, as they were usually not everyday sidearms as much as a spare. In that role, from what I've read "Kit Guns" were not standard at all in size or caliber.
Though size and weight was, often a factor. To some, the considerations for choosing were more specific. Commonality of caliber or even duplication of their everyday sidearm was of greater importance.

As the terminology changed with time and custom, the term "Kit" has slowly faded in original meaning.
Today a "Kit Gun" is often thought of as a Sidearm for the outdoors-person, rather than its component back-up role. Further the adoption of of the name "Kit Gun" to designate a particular model, as in S&Ws fine J frame rim fires, has gradually blurred the original meaning and intent of the term.
Therefore many folks,whose only exposure to "Kit Guns" is through models so named, have developed the idea that only 22 rim fires are true "Kit Guns"

Wrong,?? yes technically, but its kind of like all the shooters who use the term "Clip" instead of "Magazine". We all know what they mean despite the incorrect usage of the term.

So is the "Kit Gun" dead? Hardly !! Many of us have designated guns that we use as BUGs for everyday carry or guns that are relegated to the glove compartment or consoles of our vehicles. No different than the KG that nestled in your great great granddads saddlebag wrapped in oilcloth.
Certainly keeping a neat little package nicked away in your backpack, tackle box or the panier's of your touring bike is all in keeping with the spirit of the KIT GUN
 
Like me they are still around. Got this one in 1970, great little pistol.

insurpics027.jpg
 
I have a Model 63 kit gun and unfortunately have found it to be the most woefully inaccurate revolver I have ever owned, and that covers a lot of ground. I have tries various manufacturers ammo, some very high quality and some of the cheapest. When I say inaccurate, I mean unable to shoot a 5" group at 25 years from a BENCH REST! It just sprays them all over the place regardless of ammo. I have had it for 15 years and rarely shoot it. Not sure why I still have it.
 
I'd hate to think that anyone was ready to give up on the kit gun. I've never owned one of S&W's J-frame .22's, but I've had a Ruger Mk II since about 1987 or '88. That gun has traveled alot of miles with me. Back in the early 90's I bought a Ruger SP101 with a 4" barrel in .22LR. Quite honestly, it outshoots the S&W K-22 I once owned, and it's my wife's favorite gun.

Remember the S&W 422's? A friend of mine owned one with what I think was a two or three inch barrel, I think the designation was a 2214 Sportsman? It was a really accurate little gun and I always thought it made a fine kit gun.
 
>>I have a Model 63 kit gun and unfortunately have found it to be the most woefully inaccurate revolver I have ever owned<<

Yeah, target guns they're not. :(
 
IIf 'Kit Gun' means a handgun you always take with you when you go into the great 'Outback', then my 'Kit Gun' in the 60's was a Ruger Super Single Six. Today it is a S&W 329PD.
 
heritage rough rider .22 convertible goes in my "kit" of gear I have should I go bumbling around and get myself lost for a few days and need to get some dinner. but I carry a .45colt blackhawk and a gp100 .357 where I can get to them for defensive purposes
 
Ruger single six

I bring my little ruger single six with me a lot when I go fishing or camping. I can bring a lot of ammo to plink with. I also live in the southeast and do not have to many 4 legged critters to worry about.
 
That was the best part about fishing with my grandfather,,,

I didn't like the fishing very much,,,
We kids weren't allowed to talk.

But if I kept my mouth shut and didn't bug Papa,,,
Before we left the lake he would let me shoot the H&R .22 that lived in his tackle box.

It's a little big to be a "classic" kit gun,,,
But yesterday I purchased a S&W Model 18 K-22 Combat Masterpiece.

My best friend has a pristine S&W Model 63,,,
I've been trying for years to buy that little thing from her,,,
She says she would sell her firstborn before she parts with her little beauty.

She has a carry permit but never carries on her person,,,
She only obtained it so she can keep her 63 loaded in the glove box.

In my neck of the woods the kit gun concept is coming back,,,
With ammo costs so high everyone is buying a smallish .22 for casual shooting.

My pawn shop guy says he has sold lots of Taurus Model 94's and Charter Pathfinders in the past year,,,
Not too many new S&W's because they are so danged expensive,,,
So the Kit Gun is seeing a resurgence around here.
 
L Killkenny said:
Also has to do with the more gun control laws today. A gun in the tackle box will get you in hand cuffs in much of the US. Iowa included.

Yep. It's hard enough to keep up with the fishing regulations in GA and stay legal in that department, much less have to worry about a pistol in your tackle-box.
 
I have a kit gun....

Ruger Mk I (or Standard) .22 that goes with me when I go deer hunting mostly - it is to pop the occasional squirrel or rabbit that I do not want to use the rifle on. I don't need a larger pistol while deer hunting as my rifle would fill the need for self-defense against any two or four legged aggresors. However, when I just camp or hike, my "kit gun" is any of my full-size 9MM pistols. Snakes, however, are the only thing it has had to defend me against so I guess that Ruger 22 would have been fine.
 
I purchased a 34-1 2" that had seen a few miles to replace my Ruger Bearcat. Loved the Bearcat but needed adjustable sights.

My 34 is the perfect "woods, camping............." sidearm. Versatile in its use and darn accurate.

Yea I have a .357 for the grizzly bear that charges me every other time I'm fishing or hiking in NC but there is still nothing like dusting up cans, sticks and other meanies with a .22. :D
 
When I lived in SE Alaska, I carried my "fishing pistol" an M58 S&W 4" .41 Mag.
"Stateside" I carry my "kit gun" Model 94 Taurus 4".
It fits in the tackle box, perfectly WITH a box of shells. If I'm out camping or just offroad, it's in an Uncle Mikes just behind my Leatherman.
Have fun,
Gene
 
I still have several. S&W mod 34 (soon to be for sale) , Charter Arms Pathfinder, H&R 622. That said, I think the intended use of a "kit gun" is a dying thing. Too many regulations on handgun possession, hunting etc for many people to bother to take one along on fishing and camping trips these days. Great little guns that are fun to shoot though.

As for .22 being 'enough" it is for it's intended "kit" purposes of pl inking and putting small game in the pot.

Btw: I'd argue that .22 is big enough for defence against a bear. I don't need to kill the bear, just shoot somebody else in the knee so I can run faster :D
 
I'm a grouse hunter. I can't bring myself to whack one out of a tree with my L.C. Smith featherweight 16 gauge when one of a more dimwitted persuasion does a short flush up into a tree to get away from my spaniel.

But will I take a pop at him with my M63? Oh yeah.:cool:
 
kit gun

No not dead, but fading fast. Most folks it seems these days, go bigger and badder.

I stumbled up on a deal for a Ruger Bearcat a few years ago and it is my near constant companion in the fall while bowhunting, usually just riding in the pocket of my big wool pants. Nothing else I own carries as easy, yet offers the degree of plinking accuracy the Bearcat does.

Prior the Bearcat, a Ruger MkII auto, the std version with 4" bbl, went many a mile on a web belt, w/ GI flap holster a FA pouch , holding spare ammo and a GI canteen.

My kit gun plus is a Ruger Single 6 w/ the .22 mag cylinder, which has pretty much replaced the MkII, w/ more punch and, as it belonged to my Dad, sentimental appeal.
 
I love so many of the guns mentioned.
I don't think bigger is better, whatever you enjoy is what makes life better.
22s are the best.
 
As I was growing up (1950's/60's), the kit gun was used mostly for messing around with in camp.....as for recreational plinking and for the amusement of the youngsters. One could also shoot a rabbet, squirrel or grouse for camp meat. Most men had them, and usually they were light frame .22 revolvers of every brand and description. And they called them kit guns.

I have used mostly autos for the purpose over the years, including the Colt Woodsman, a couple of High Standards and a Walther ppk/s. Still do. I call them my kit guns.
 
Kit Gun

I use my Ruger Mark II for that type of kit gun application, although I usually have a snub nose 38 spl handy at the same time.
 
Back
Top