Glenn E. Meyer commented:
It also emphasizes the development of the the two gun cultures and how the sporting/hunting part isn't the growth area.
That doesn't surprise me. A great many of the new firearm owners I've encountered as I researched and bought my own first gun, and went to my CCW class, are first-time owners concerned about Second Amendment rights who want those rights to remain available to all.
I'm in my late 40s and have never owned a gun before myself, although my father did and I was exposed to guns as a child. Guns are therefore no mystery to me, and although I respect them, they don't scare me. I also have no interest in hunting, and after many years living in an urban area with a fairly high crime rate without problems, no serious fear of encountering violence I could not counter without a gun by simply avoiding dangerous places/times and exercising situational awareness.
I probably would not own a gun except for my concern that my right to choose to do so was under attack. My sense of this was probably heightened because I spent the last two decades in California before moving late last year to Nevada. Although I wasn't thrilled to spend several hundred dollars on a good, safe gun and a couple of hours a week minimum to attain and then maintain proficiency using it, I felt the time had arrived to assert my rights under the Second Amendment, lest by failing to do so my voice might not be heard by those who make, interpret, and enforce the laws.
Fortunately, in spite of the current president's views on guns, the tide is turning the other way. Looks to me like Heller, and the recent 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that incorporated it against the State of California, have confirmed that.