is anyone else at scotusblog right now?

sigh. I just hope Kennedy has not run off the rails as he did with Gitmo.

Even our military don't enjoy habeus. How terrorists do is quite past my understanding. Oh, and UK and Germany just extended the time they can keep terrorists without charging them. Maybe someone over there knows something?
 
SPEAK YOU DAMNED COWARDS, SPEAK!
I guess it takes a long time to scribble out those long-winded judicial opinions, (especially since Ruth writes in crayon with her tongue sticking out the corner of her mouth.)
 
You know how in baseball, if the pitcher is throwing a no-hitter, nobody talks about it, and most certainly, nobody talks to - or looks at - the pitcher? Have you ever noticed that the moment someone points out that the game has gone hitless, the pitcher throws a sinker that don't sink and holy %^&* there's a bomb launched into the left field bleachers? Or right field? Or dances close the yellow line such that umpires can't tell?

What does this baseball anecdote have to do with the Heller decision? Everything.

It's the top of the 9th inning.
 
Dang, I was hoping it would come out in time for my Constitutional Law class tonight. This is going to be real interesting, but I have to say I am a bit worried. This could be a very weird opinion...
 
WeedWacker, the Court normally releases its opinions on Mondays. Because they still have so many opinions yet to be released, they announced they would be releasing them on Mondays and Thursdays, until the end of the session.

Monday the 23rd is the end of the regular session.

If the Heller decision is not released today or next Monday, we will have to wait until, at least, the First Monday of October (the beginning of the next session).
 
The Court is releasing more than one opinion today.

Metlife v. Glenn - Affirmed for Glenn
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. EEOC - Reversed for EEOC

Still waiting, more to follow
 
From Scotusblogs Tom Goldstein:

The Court has released the opinion in MetLife v. Glenn (06-923), on whether the fact that a claim administrator of an ERISA plan also funds the plan benefits constitutes a “conflict of interest” that must be weighed in a judicial review of the administrator’s benefit determination. The ruling below, which found for the claimant, is affirmed.

The Court has released the opinion in Kentucky Retirement Systems v. EEOC (06-1037), on whether the relevance of age as a potential factor in the distribution of retirement benefits to disabled workers establishes a prima facie case of arbitrary discrimination under the ADEA. The ruling below, which found for the EEOC, is reversed.

The Court has released the opinion in Indiana v. Edwards (07-208), on whether criminal defendants found competent to stand trial must be permitted to represent themselves. The ruling below, which found for the defendant, is vacated and remanded.

The Court has released the opinion in Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (06-1505), on whether, in a disparate impact suit under the ADEA, workers or employers bear the burden of persuasion in determining whether the employment decision was based on “reasonable factors other than age.” The ruling below, which found for the employer, is vacated and remanded.
 
Back
Top