In the bank and...

R

Rob P.

Moderator
Awhile back a local bank that I have used on occasion was robbed by a guy with a handgun. I was not in the bank at the time and the BG grabbed some cash and ran out the back before the cops got there (6 minutes after the alarm was hit). This is a branch of my bank and I have been in this branch in the past.

Question: If you were in the bank and CCW when a lone masked person came in and waved a gun around while robbing the place what would you do?

This issue has bothered me for about a week or so because I have 2 answers. 1. Be a good witness, and; 2. Draw and shoot if the BG threatens me with the weapon.

Since the BG is robbing the bank and I'm only incidental to that nor am I truly being threatened if the BG is able to get away being a good witness is probably the right thing to do.

OTOH, if the BG is waving a gun around, that pretty much indicates that he is willing to use it to get his way. Given the number of violent or take-over robberies that have been happening, the risk that the BG will actually try to use the gun is fairly high. So, I actually am in physical danger should something happen to key the BG into shooting someone. Being in physical danger means I have the right and obligation to protect myself.

So, what would be the preferred course of action?
 
Both options are potentially correct depending on the circumstances. In my opinion in order for me to draw and shoot the BG would have to have a visible weapon and at least threaten to use it. If something like give me the money or I'll shoot you" or "don't make me hurt someone" came out of his mouth then I would go for it. Even then I'd draw, get a bead on him, and tell him to freeze and drop his weapon. If the so much as turned to look at me without dropping the gun I'd pull the trigger. But I don't think I'd do anything if they just had a gun. I'm sure several banks have been robbed with the threat of a weapon when none was present or it was fake.
 
Rob,

I'm afraid that this is going to turn into another "you are a coward because you are afraid to do the right thing no matter what the cost" versus a "its not my hide on the line so why should I complicate my life" war. Some people are just itching for an opportunity to shoot someone. For many others (the more mature members of ths board in my opinion), they view the use of lethal force as an absolute last resort and would only use it if their own or a loved one's life was endangered.

I would have to say the answer to this scenario depends on the situation. For example, if the bank was full of people (I can't imagine robber would be so stupid) there is a very good chance of hitting bystanders. Furthermore, engaging the target would cause him to return fire (assuming you aren't capable of 100% head shots) and endanger others and yourself. If it turned into a hostage situation because the clavary showed up while the bad guy was still there, I would shoot given the opportunity.

Good Luck and I hope you never have to use it.
 
Waitaminute!!! First, tell me where it is legal to CCW in a bank. Some states allow it and some don't. What is the federal authority to bar firearms in a bank? Savings & loans? Federal credit union?
 
The outcome would depend on several factors. Upon or previous to entrance, I would have noted several things. Numbers two and three are for purpose of conducting my own business as promptly and smoothly as possible, the rest are the result of awareness of a possible the following:

1) Any abnormalities in vehicular presence.
2) Whether or not the security is present and alert.
3) Whether or not the bank tellers seem competent and capable.
4) Whether it appears any of the clientele, the security guard(s), or the tellers, in that order, pose an immediate threat.
5) Whether or not there are any children or females present, including tellers and security.

The second set of observations would be made in specific secenarios, I.E. where I was in the world, what bank, what state, what laws, et cetera. In this case, it would be concerning the bank robbery.
1) Descript and hierarchy of numbers.
2) Is it a seemingly preplanned, organised movement, or experienced persons?
3) Are they using a weapon? If so, do they appear profficient or skilled in its use?
4) What is the likelyhood of interior assistance, in any way or form?
5) What is the likelyhood of ulterior assistance, in any way or form?
6) What is the purpose of the infraction?


To summarise possible reactions, although it is ONLY a summary...
1) Any significant abnormalities, or a combination of minor abnormalities, means I simply do not enter. This is the best way to avoid all altrication.
2) If there are no women or children present, I could not care less. In order to present a threat, there must be something to threaten, and in my perspective the human male is worth nothing.
3) If the infractor is unarmed, I do nothing. It is not the crime I care anything about.
4) If it is seemingly well-organised, and well-lead, I do nothing whether or not they are armed. An organised group implied a lesser likelyhood to actually kill anyone. There is also a lesser chance of myself being effective as a method of neutralisation.
5) If the infractor is armed, there are women or children present (including the infractor), and it is seemingly unorganised, I would kill the infractor(s). Note that I made no reference to a gun; how it is done would be circumstantial. My reasoning for it is this:

I have witnessed three bank robberies during in America the course of my life. One was committed without the use of physical weaponry. The two who did so served a miniscule sentence for it, and the money was nver recovered by law enforcement. One of the other two infractors was shot down before he posed too much of a threat, by a swift security guard, immediately after he drew and opened fire (there had been two guards, I can only assume the man was wired enough to just see one). The other one was apprehended shortly after.

In America, it is incredibly stupid to rob a bank with a weapon, evermore so a firearm. Many bank policies require of them to hand over the money if a threat is imposed, and there are many ways of doing this without commiting a second degree felony. Because of this, it is unlikely (possible, but I rarely dwell on the insubstantial) that any unorganised armed robber is intelligent, experienced, or has previously planned. This sort of a person poses an extremely high risk of doing harm to myself or other persons whom I might be interested in preventing harm to. The best way of circumventing that is removing the risk.
 
If your going to carry a CW, a person better think tactically, and I mean full time.

How do you KNOW the only bad guy is the one you see? Quite often, these guys use backup that enter the business first and pose as a customer. They walk out as just another patron if all goes smoothly. If not, you are suddenly outnumbered, most likely faced with a tactical situation you don't remotely know how to deal with, and on the back side of the lag time curve. Say goodnight, Gracie...

Are you a pro who has been trained extensively to respond to an armed robbery scenario with numerous bystanders, or a gent with the usual minimal required CCW training? If the later, this isn't the place to learn. Remember that once you pull out that sidearm, you'll most likely be held criminally and even more likely, CIVILLY RESPONSIBLE for everything that happens and every round fired.

In a bank, those funds are federally insured. You and the other patrons won't lose your money. Unless you are a LEO, you have no duty to get involved, and even LEOs caught in a bank in this situation don't play their hand unless absolutely necessary.

Your best value is as a witness, and you have to survive to testify...
 
As long as the robbery is going "smoothly" I will be nothing but a good witness. It is not my job to save the bank money that it has a policy of handing over to any person who demands it. The gun is to protect my family's and my own lives first and foremost. The safest outcome for everyone would be no shots fired. The best outcome for me is the criminal(s) flee the scene before police arrive avoiding a standoff.

Even if the teller is threatenned I will not immediately intervene. As already stated you do not know if he has unseen back up inside or outside the bank. One thing is certain, if it hits the fan after you draw and innocents are hit YOU will be blamed by the media and very possibly by the authorities depending on the area and outcry.

If things start to come apart and say a hostage a situation ensues I am going to act if I feel the need to. First I will fully appraise the situation, by that point any accomplices should be clearly seen.

There will be no commands to freeze or drop it. My job is nto to arrest them, it is to protect innocent lives. Theirs are forfeit. Don't forget the poor CCW holder at the Tacoma Mall in WA last year who challenged a gunman shooting into the crowds of people. For his kind consideration of a criminal he was rewarded with the possibility of being in a wheelchair for the rest of his life as a cripple. YOU are not a cop. YOU do not have backup. YOU are not there to enact an arrest. YOU are there to survive. If this means I "unfairly" drill two rounds through his back so be it! There is only ONE fair outcome and that ends with me walking out alive.

In the words of Touco from The Good, The Bad and The Ugly "When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk."
 
For your case ,unless there is a destinct threat , just be a witness.....Here are two real bank stories ..In my bank a fellow was carrying legally and thought the gun was concealed but the teller saw it . When he left the bank he was greeted by FBI and police ! Very embarrassing !....In PA a couple went to the bank. He was carrying and his wife knew it. While in the bank two BGs entered to rob the bank. The wife , in a loud whisper, said to her husband " don't pull your gun" The BGs heard that and immediately killed him !!! ...Don't be so anxious to be a hero . Get good training and do some serious thinking !
 
Yowzers, that PA one will make your hair stand on end. The one advantage you have as a CCW civilian is surprise. My wife knows to ALWAYS keep her mouth shut about what may or may not be on my person.

When I lived in FL the owner of the gun shop I frequented was a retired LEO. He had a grainy B&W photo on the wall. If you asked him about it he would point out that it was a bank during a robberry conducted by two guys with AK clones. Of the many people on the floor he would point out the one at the bottom of the picture that was him. He was off duty, plain clothes and packing at the time. He was also absolutely certain he wasn't going to do something to get himself or others killed. Two prepared guys in a crowded bank with AKs against one guy with a ccw handgun... After they left one criminal killed the other.

Lessons were:

1. Don't pull it out unless you absolutely have to.
2. Don't get into a gunfight you don't think you can win.
 
"Do you know what the definition of hero is? Someone who gets innocent people killed." ~ Serenity

Bank money is insured and will be replaced. Lives posess no insurance, and are irreplacable. Don't be a hero.
 
Hey, KNJoe:

Did you use the Pythagorean Theorem to come up with all that, or did you leap to Quadratic Equations instead?:p

Way too much thought process to make in a second or two of tense decision making, IMO.
 
Hey, KNJoe:

Did you use the Pythagorean Theorem to come up with all that, or did you leap to Quadratic Equations instead?

Way too much thought process to make in a second or two of tense decision making, IMO.
Click to expand...
I don't think you quite understand. That IS how one should be thinking in any situation, either in order to prevent such altrications from arising, or to prevent them from ending with less... Ease, than they might.
Anyone with appropriate control can calmly speak to a gunman threatening his life, despite the fact that only a few pounds and a quarter inch stand between life and death. Anyone with decent training and experience should also know what do to and how to do it in that same situation.
What I presented was simply a very progressive, and orderly statement about how I, myself, process.
None of the above information takes more than a few moments to process. The first subset takes only a few seconds, literally, to observe. Most of the time it takes to do so is mechanically induced, such as how long it takes you to look to turn your head slightly and look out the corner of your eye. The second subset takes slightly longer, because of its social basis. Still, this would take no longer than a few seconds itself--and full ideology is not necessary for action. On the contrary, you should be fully prepared to act on any given information on any given time.

Perhaps the difference you fail to grasp is the fact that I ALREADY KNOW WHAT I'D DO. That's why my post encompasses so much, and why it is set out the way it is. Unlike many of the others here, I already know exactly what I would do under any given circumstances, as opposed to stopping to think about it. Sir William asks others what THEY would do; his post inherently shows his lack or presconsideration on the subject. DTakas states that both alternatives are 'potentially correct,' and that it could 'depend on the circumstances.' To me, they are not both potentially correct; I already know under what circumstances I would act doing what. My line of work necessitates it, and so also necessitates my awareness, willingness, and ability. I have no doubt as to how any of those three would affect the outcome of something being described. You do.
Also... You both are unprepared for such an instance, you have really crappy comebacks. Use something that works, or that is at least even remotely funny. The use of the Pythagorean Theorem would dictate that yourself squared, plus the situation squared, would equal the outcome squared. This would imply that yourself, the situation, or the outcome are inflective. This is not so; they affect ulterior variables, which in turn affect yourself. Obviously a very ineffectual analogy.
 
I know that in Texas you are allowed to use deadly force in behalf of another person if they are threatened with deadly force and you are afraid for their life.

as to the bank scenario...dunno would have to be there and see what options I felt I had.
 
Waitaminute!!! First, tell me where it is legal to CCW in a bank. Some states allow it and some don't. What is the federal authority to bar firearms in a bank? Savings & loans? Federal credit union?
Click to expand...
my state repealed its law prohibiting the carrying of firearms into financial institutions years ago.

if the robber starts shooting, i'll draw and fire. if not, i can give a good description to law enforcement.
 
I'm not pulling my weapon unless someone threatens me or a loved one directly. Mister Badguy can have all of my banks money, as long as he doesn't decide to point his piece at me or my fianceé. I'm not going to deal with the police, or even worse, face possible civil liability for anything that doesn't directly threaten me.

I'm not a police officer, and i'm not sworn to protect the public. I'm out for me and my own, and that's it.

Besides, banks have procedures for these kind of things. Dye packs, trackers, etc. Thirdly, the money is insured. Misterbadguy takes a couple hundred thousand dollars, but my money is insured. I've got nothing to gain and EVERYTHING to lose.

Now, if mister badguy decides to threaten me, my fianceé is under standing orders to shoot someone, as am I. Big difference there.

EDIT: Glad to see we don't have a bunch of cowboys. I think I like it here.
 
If my own life, my loved one's life was in definite danger and/or directly threatened I'd engage w/out hesitation.

Other than that, I'm a good witness.

You have to read the situation, and attempt to forecast how it's going to go down in order to determine if escalating the situation is warranted, via introduction of your firearm.

Personally, I don't want to pull that trigger unless I have to. I won't feel good about taking a life, even if it helps the "gene pool." But I will do it if forced to.

nitrogen said:
EDIT: Glad to see we don't have a bunch of cowboys. I think I like it here.
Click to expand...
Just wait...
 
Difficult to answer while sitting at the computer, knocking back a cold one aftrer a long day in the cubicle.
Bet I could make up my mind at the time though. :)
 
For the last few years, . . . I probably don't go into banks more than 6 or 7 times a year. But when I do, . . . I'm carrying, . . . I'm looking, . . . I'm observing.

IF I saw a robbery going down, . . . and IF I saw a real sure enough gun, . . . and IF I was reasonably sure there was only one perp (haven't heard of a multi perp robbery in some time around here), . . . and IF I got the idea the bg was about to use that firearm: two to the head with no remorse at all. All our banks around here I go into makes the shot no more than 15 feet, so I have no fear of missing.

But mostly, . . . I doubt if all those IF's will come together, . . . so I'll probably just be a good witness, . . . having punched 911 on my cell phone and laid it up on the counter to get all the audio.

May God bless,
Dwight
 
As long as the robber doesn't point his gun at me,I won't point my gun at him.No,I'm not dense enough to think I can outdraw someone that has a gun pointed at me,but when he turns his attention away from me,he'l be getting a subscription to a whole new kind of magazine...;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top