Important Court Ruling

The findings of fact (the various discrepancies in billing) probably can not be challenged. The judges discretionary actions in not applying any Loadstar enhancements are what may be appealed.

There is nothing ordinary about this case. It is a case that will be cited for the next 100 years. It took an amazing amount of determination and extraordinary litigation skill to bring this case to its victory.

It says something about these 6 attorneys that stuck to litigation when the defendants were going through attorneys like sand through a sieve. <-- This may not be an arguable point, yet it instructs us that nothing about this case was ordinary.

Also, consider what this determination will do for Gura's fees in the Chicago case.

I'm sure all of this is going through Alan Gura's mind, as he digests this order.
 
DC will probably procure the money to pay this bill by taxing firearms sales or other specifically-firearms related fees.

You know they will.
 
I think it's probably low on the list of priorities but it doesn't seem that exorbitant fees have been challenged or attacked legally.

New York City's fees for a handgun license cost as much as many pistols do. ($340.00. and $94.25 for fingerprints)

I have no idea what Chicago and Ilinois will eventually do - but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. Right now we have to focus on getting a good carry law.
 
^ wow, you got it all covered Al.

I know the courts go slowly (Moore v Madigan is killing me), but the Kwong case is from April :eek:
 
Not to trumpet my own horn, but that list is the most complete list of relevant US gun cases on the Internet.

Nor is it all my own work. Many people have helped to build that list.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top