I know a lot bout American history, I am of course a Proud American, I'm no Dentist, and I don't give a care about dentistry, but there's no reason to be ashamed about it is there? There's also no reason for me to understand Gold Smelting...
Even stupid junk like Members of Rock Bands that everyone else knows, they have no meaning to me whatsoever.
Why in the world would it matter who the lead singer of Slade, or Y&T or Aerosmith or the Rolling Stones have ANY impact on anything relevant in the known world, outside stupid radio contests of course...???...??? I KNOW the music and can tell you which band sung which one, but the names of the singers mean nothing.
I feel the same about war heroes and generals and lieutenants and enlisted... WHO they are means nothing to me. It's what they did that is important. Knowing their names, I believe is unimportant unless you're in history class taking a test.
I was in no way coming down on collectors, I am a collector of MANY things and ALL of them are antique, and 95% of them are American. I own ONE new gun, it's an old S&W 22A. New but only new to me. The rest are decades old and there are many of them.
Your posts are NOT obnoxious, I enjoy a good conversation! This is a little off the main reason for my topic but it's a good talk I think.
It means you might ridicule something simply because you are ignorant of its importance. For some people that would be a plus.
I honestly do not understand how you can issue this statement buzzkook. You seem to be assuming that you know the meaning of my thoughts because of a reply I have typed. Can you please reiterate your thoughts in a less assuming form? It will ease the process of replying to that accusatory line without actually getting upset about it. I do not take lightly to being referred to as ignorant.
Since I can't shut up sometimes, I'll change my original question to one that applies to ALL of my collecting hobbies and interests.
Would I be out of line thinking that someone paying $100,000 for a pistol is a little ridiculous, regardless of anyone that owned it besides Adam and Eve? Or is the major consensus that I'm a tool for thinking other people are tools that would think someone was so much better than themselves that they would pay magnificent amounts of money to possess an item that some 'other' person owned simply because of what that person did in life???
How's that for self worth...
Maybe I'm just an unconventional tard...
{What's a sword that was wielded by a Viking worth? Why would it be worth MORE if Eric the Red (my direct descendant) owned it than is Billy the Fat Viking owned it? Isn't the significance in the sword, and not the owner? Or is that just me being a tool again? What president makes these peoples possessions different than their neighbors?}