Ding and JCH, for those of us like Bad Medicine (and me) who are pursuing an MCSE, the timing is a bit odd.
Yes, with the implementation of the 2000 platform, MCSE under NT 4.0 will be less desirable. But many employers will still desire it. How many businesses out there will be running NT for sometime to come? Plenty.
But there is a very good reason to take selected requisite MCSE tests this year. If you pass NT Server, NT Workstation, and NT Server in the Enterprise before December 31, you will be qualified to take the "accelerated" exam after January 1. This exam, coupled with the aforementioned 3 exams, will net you an MCSE under the 2000 platform. This accelerated exam is the same exam that those who are now MCSE NT will take to upgrade their certification to 2000.
I suppose Microsoft is offering this options to MCPs because of the timing factor. I enrolled in school in March. It is bloody difficult to get all exams for MCSE under your belt in 9 months. And of course, if you did, you would just have to take the accelerated exam anyway.
Bad Medicine, I am right where you are, friend. Passed Workstation 933/1000. Passed Server 966/1000. (yes, I am proud of those scores.) Now I am studying for Enterprise. I am a little concerned about this one. The first two exams were standard, non-adaptive tests, 30 questions each. Enterprise is an adaptive exam, and I will not be getting a score in the 900's this time, I fear. Go back and pound the material. You still have 7 weeks to pass it.
Look at it this way. You paid 100 bucks to get a look at the test. That is not money down the drain, as far as I'm concerned. Hang in there. You'll get it. As far as being a failure, I think not!
If it makes you feel any better, one of my instructors is one of the most brilliant, computer savvy people I know. He works for Siemens and he is a hotshot. He failed the Essentials exam 4 times before passing. Many of these questions on the exams are idiotic and very poorly worded. You have to get into that Microsoft question-and-answer mode. Rather than taking the time to think up a scenario and developing the question in a logical manner, they have an answer at which they wish for you to arrive, and then build a question around it. It's asinine, and is not indicative of your performance in a real world production environment.
Food for thought.