Experience in what? I haven't had ISP detectives knocking on my door for contacting an official, neither was I such a detective. I don't believe that this is a tinfoil hat issue either though. "Precedent" is a legal concept, and I understand that this is not a legal case. Not yet, anyway.My point here is this a tinfoil hat issue, or do you have some actual experience in this?
See, it's hard to prove that you DIDN'T do something. Even if you keep the fax, how do you prove that it was the ONLY fax that you've sent? That's why people just don't do this, and should not be expected to do this. That's why we use presumption of innocence. It's much easier to show that the act DID take place, provided that the evidence is in fact there. There is proof that Kotowski sent ISP detectives homes of people (person?) who wrote him, so much for presumption of his innocence. Now the ball is in his court - to show that he had a reason to do that. As I said earlier, the ball seems to be resting peacefully there.
Use of public resources for own amusement. This is an opinion, but opinion based on fairly strong indirect evidence. Kotowski just may produce the threatening fax. I personally would bet against it.Whats the abuse?