+1. A few years back, Bill J. Clinton caught hell over his Mexico Bailout plan. I have no respect for The Great Fornicator and his antics in the Offal Office, but let's be fair: The dollars of illegals that go to Mexico now are simply Bush's stealth mode Mexico Bailout.the banks that are funneling the illegals money back to mexico have a big hand in it.
Just to be clear, I don't blame someone for wanting to improve his life. But as Paul Harvey says, "And now, the rest of the story." The issue of illegal aliens is filled with untold "rests" of the stories...theres an honest way to do anything...including bettering one's lot in life...
+1. A few years back, Bill J. Clinton caught hell over his Mexico Bailout plan. I have no respect for The Great Fornicator and his antics in the Offal Office, but let's be fair: The dollars of illegals that go to Mexico now are simply Bush's stealth mode Mexico Bailout.
Ask yourself why big-monied interests wanted the first Mexico Bailout, and you'll have the same answers as to why big monied interests want to continue this second Mexico Bailout. Same product, different packaging.
Correct. However, to be fair, Reagan’s plan was based on an enforcement mechanism that punished employers of illegals, but that enforcement mechanism was defeated. Reagan was less guilty of allowing illegal aliens into the country and more guilty of trusting Congress. He should have taken his own advice that government is the problem.You forgot to add the first great amnesty of Illegal Aliens back in 1986.
Reagan also left his mark on America’s immigration policy. The country has spent much of the last week looking back upon Reagan’s two administrations, and it’s worth looking back at what has happened to the nation's immigration policy since the historic immigration reforms Reagan signed into law in 1986. As well-intentioned and rational as they were, the 1986 immigration reforms—and what has happened since they became law—show just how damaging another illegal immigration amnesty would be to our country.
In 1986, there were about 2.5 million illegal aliens in the U.S. who Congress and the Reagan administration regarded as being “safe” – that is, not having committed serious crimes or otherwise being dangerous, and having sufficient ties to American life to be allowed to remain here. Many members of Congress, chiefly Democratic members, regarded the amnesty of these illegal aliens a sine qua non of any attempt to reform our immigration laws. Reagan recognized this, and, being the optimist that he was, saw something humane and profitable in affording this relatively small group of illegal aliens legal status.
In exchange for legal status for the group, Reagan insisted that the magnet attracting illegal aliens to the United States be removed by extinguishing any incentive for U.S. employers to hire illegal aliens. In tandem with the amnesty, Reagan campaigned for employer sanctions for hiring illegal aliens, sanctions so stringent that many at the time regarded them as draconian.
Reagan reasoned that if an employer were fined for hiring an illegal alien (as much as $1 million in the worst cases), any payroll savings achieved by the hiring would be wiped out by the fine. In effect, it would be more expensive to hire illegal aliens than to hire Americans or lawful permanent residents. The few illegal aliens who continued to take the gamble and cross the border would be intercepted by a robust and more generously funded Border Patrol.
While Reagan’s 1986 immigration reforms can at least be called rational, they were a failure. Today, there are between 8 million and 11 million illegal aliens in the United States. The majority of them crossed our southern border and has found employment — illegal employment, but employment nonetheless. This is attributed to Sen. Ted Kennedy’s eventual gutting of the enforcement mechanism for Reagan's employer sanctions, and successive administrations refusing to give our Border Patrol the resources it needs to achieve its mission.
In 1986, though, President Reagan showed a clear recognition between wrong and right. If U.S. employers were to gain from the employment of people whose very presence in our country was a crime, then they would at least have to pay for it.
How far we’ve come since 1986. At the moment, there are two amnesty bills pending in Congress, and both predicate an illegal aliens’ eligibility on the very thing that President Reagan fought so hard to stamp out: illegal alien employment.