If Obama picks a pro-gun VP?
- Thread starter Redneck with a 40
- Start date
MedicineBow
New member
Wow.
Where is Obama going to put all those blue helmets when he has them invade us?
Oh, wait.
Maybe they'll have to live in and assume the mortgages of all those houses in foreclosure! And that's good news: those UN boys will will be so worried about their debt that they'll be too distracted when riding around with the postmen to remember to seize our weapons.
Where is Obama going to put all those blue helmets when he has them invade us?
Oh, wait.
Maybe they'll have to live in and assume the mortgages of all those houses in foreclosure! And that's good news: those UN boys will will be so worried about their debt that they'll be too distracted when riding around with the postmen to remember to seize our weapons.
If Senator Obama was suddenly bludgeoned by the Pro Gun Fairy...
He still would be a total lightweight regarding foreign policy and he would still be a pro-taxation Marxist.
And we still wouldn't know for what he is hoping and we still wouldn't know what he wants to change.
Senator McCain is my very least favorite Republican-almost conservative; but he's better for the nation than Senator Obama. Maybe not much, certainly not as much as I would like, but still better.
He still would be a total lightweight regarding foreign policy and he would still be a pro-taxation Marxist.
And we still wouldn't know for what he is hoping and we still wouldn't know what he wants to change.
Senator McCain is my very least favorite Republican-almost conservative; but he's better for the nation than Senator Obama. Maybe not much, certainly not as much as I would like, but still better.
No. The Veep does very little: His/her duties are essentially cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate, and assume the position if/when the POTUS gets impeached/resigns/dies in office. The actual running of the administration and policy making is the bailiwick of the POTUS. Obama picking a pro-gun veep is shameless pandering and future promise breaking to gun owners silly enough to believe what he says on guns. The veep will have absolutely no influence on an Obama administration's gun policies.
If, and only if, Obama is successfully impeached, resigns, or eats bad shellfish before August 2009. In a word, no.
applesanity
New member
I'm not a single issue voter.
Even if Obama himself were a lifelong pro-gunner. Even if he knew what "well regulated," "militia," "the right of the People," and "shall not be infringed" mean. Forget the VP.
Even if he owned more guns than he knew what to do with. Even if he can fire a beat up Mini-14 in a standing position, using surplus ammo, and make 0.5" groups at 600 yards during a midsummer thunderstorm... at night.
Even if Obama knew the answer to 9mm vs. .45ACP, an answer that everyone, and I mean everyone, will agree upon.
Even if instead of cologne, he used Hoppes #9.
Even if he could break a Glock 17 with his bare hands.
I would still not vote for him.
Even if Obama himself were a lifelong pro-gunner. Even if he knew what "well regulated," "militia," "the right of the People," and "shall not be infringed" mean. Forget the VP.
Even if he owned more guns than he knew what to do with. Even if he can fire a beat up Mini-14 in a standing position, using surplus ammo, and make 0.5" groups at 600 yards during a midsummer thunderstorm... at night.
Even if Obama knew the answer to 9mm vs. .45ACP, an answer that everyone, and I mean everyone, will agree upon.
Even if instead of cologne, he used Hoppes #9.
Even if he could break a Glock 17 with his bare hands.
I would still not vote for him.
Wuluf wrote:
Could you imagine the first hunting trip between the Nuge and BO.
Ted Nugent: "Now, Mr. President, seeing as I've been hunting all of my life and you have never hunted even once, let me tell you how it's done. I'll sit up there in that platform in that there tree with my bow and arrow. Your job is to start walking around in the surrounding brush, scattering this bag of apples on the ground. The object is to see if you can lead any wild pigs past me so's I can get a shot at 'em. Got it? Good".
Could you imagine the first hunting trip between the Nuge and BO.
Ted Nugent: "Now, Mr. President, seeing as I've been hunting all of my life and you have never hunted even once, let me tell you how it's done. I'll sit up there in that platform in that there tree with my bow and arrow. Your job is to start walking around in the surrounding brush, scattering this bag of apples on the ground. The object is to see if you can lead any wild pigs past me so's I can get a shot at 'em. Got it? Good".
LightningJoe
New member
Hee hee. Are we so dumb as to vote for Obama because his veep likes guns?
Obama is a symptom. If he wins, it means our disease has progressed to the next stage.
Obama is a symptom. If he wins, it means our disease has progressed to the next stage.
Lightning Joe posted:
Obama is a symptom. If he wins, it means our disease has progressed to the next stage.
In the words of that crazy old cartoon lion, Snaggle Puss, "Heavens to Obamatroid! Exit, stage left even." Yes, if we get Obama, we better get out the serious medicine. As Lightning Joe states, our disease is ready for radiation treatment. It could be Iran or North Korea delivering the radiation.
Obama is a symptom. If he wins, it means our disease has progressed to the next stage.
In the words of that crazy old cartoon lion, Snaggle Puss, "Heavens to Obamatroid! Exit, stage left even." Yes, if we get Obama, we better get out the serious medicine. As Lightning Joe states, our disease is ready for radiation treatment. It could be Iran or North Korea delivering the radiation.
Bartholomew Roberts
Moderator
I encourage people to visit http://thomas.loc.gov and read S.2433 for themselves. As much as I dislike Obama and consider him the worst Second Amendment Presidential candidate ever offered, Rifleman' 173's characterization of S.2433 is wrong. The only part of the Millenium Project that the bill addresses is the goal of reducing the number of people who live on $1 a day or less by half.
It does not address any of the other Millenium Development Goals, which may be found here:
http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
The Arms Control provisions of the Millenium Development Goals are hidden in this part of the document though (Section 2, Part 9):
http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm
However, S.2433 has nothing to do with any of the Millenium Development Goals except the reducing poverty goal. As much as I dislike Obama, it doesn't help us to pass on incorrect information and causes us to lose a lot of credibility.