Idaho Teens Tote Loaded Guns

J

jimpeel

New member
And good fer 'em!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,274138,00.html

Idaho Teens Tote Loaded Guns Around Town Legally
Sunday, May 20, 2007

POST FALLS, Idaho — Two home-schooled teenagers in this northern Idaho town say they are carrying loaded guns to the library, grocery store and other public areas for self-defense, as a crime deterrent, and to educate others about their rights.

Zach Doty, 18, carries a loaded Glock handgun on his hip. His 15-year-old brother, Steven, carries a .22-caliber rifle in a sling on his back.

Police have been called on several occasions to question the teens but have not found the teens to be in violation of the law.

In Idaho, residents 18 and older can openly carry a firearm in public. And those ages 13 to 17 who have parental permission can carry a rifle in public.

"I certainly don't anticipate that I'll need to use it, but I'd rather have it and not need it than to not have it and need it," Zach told the Coeur d'Alene Press. "There's no reason for me to hide a weapon."

Zach was stopped April 17 on his way to Bible study. On Friday, police again responded when someone reported the brothers with guns in a park. But police left after confirming it was the Doty's.

Zach has also been approached by others.

"There have been good opportunities to speak to people," he said. "I make sure they know that open carrying is legal, why I carry and I encourage them to consider doing so themselves."

The brothers carry their weapons to parks, the library, grocery stores and other places. They can't have their guns with them on school property, courthouses or jails.

Not everyone is comfortable with armed teenagers in the neighborhood.

"I turned back so that my wife could verify what I saw," said James Rebal, who called police after seeing Zach with his gun. "He was very nicely dressed and I saw nothing to be concerned about other than the weapon. It's not something you see in Idaho. Virginia Tech was fresh in my mind, and I thought it was better to err on the side of concern."

A lone gunman killed 32 people and himself last month at Virginia Tech University.

John Dunlap, commander of the American Legion Post 143, said he asked Zach to leave the Legion at a recent lunch because Zach was carrying his gun.

"He left and came back the next day (without the gun) for soup," said Dunlap, who described the brothers as "well-mannered."

Ed Santos owns Center Target Sports in Post Falls and is a gun safety instructor. He said the Dotys came to his shop but he doesn't sell handgun ammunition to people under 21.

He said that just because the Dotys are carrying guns in public doesn't mean they're not responsible with them, but questioned the need to carry them in town even though it was legal.

"My advice for them is the same as it is with adults — yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself just because you can?" Santos said. "I believe the intent (of the law) was to allow it more for hunting and recreation."

Zach said he's not paranoid or a radical.

"If I was an extremist, our founding fathers would all be extremists," he said. "Without them, we wouldn't have our independence. We'd be a disarmed British system of feudal subjectivity."
Click to expand...
 
"My advice for them is the same as it is with adults — yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself just because you can?" Santos said.
Click to expand...

Wait for it.......um, maybe because you can? I'd say he answered his own question there.

"I believe the intent (of the law) was to allow it more for hunting and recreation."
Click to expand...

For the younger boy, he may be correct. For the older boy (over 18) I believe he may well be wrong. But what I know is that it doesn't matter.
 
Zach's story can be read here over at OpenCarry.org.

Warning! Long thread, 209 posts as of this writing.

The origianl story is from the Post Falls Press, here.
 
Ed Santos owns Center Target Sports in Post Falls and is a gun safety instructor. He said the Dotys came to his shop but he doesn't sell handgun ammunition to people under 21.

He said that just because the Dotys are carrying guns in public doesn't mean they're not responsible with them, but questioned the need to carry them in town even though it was legal.

"My advice for them is the same as it is with adults — yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself just because you can?" Santos said. "I believe the intent (of the law) was to allow it more for hunting and recreation."
Click to expand...

ZUMBO ALERT!!!!!

We either stand together against the enemy or fall separately. This "Zumbo" gun store owner needs to learn this the hard way. If he has an issue with these boys then take it up with them or their parents. What he should not do is air his grievence in the media so all the world can see GUN STORE OWNER OPPOSES CARRYING FIREARMS!!!. What a complete moron.

Wasn't there just a serious shooting in Idaho?
 
Good show, chap

Speaking of Zumbo alert, just wait - won't be long before WA shows up and says something about this being redneck and hurting gun owners, etc.
 
For the record ...

and because the only archive I know that is "forever" is TFL. :D

http://www.postfallspress.com/articles/2007/05/20/news/news01.txt

Rifles and rights
By BRIAN WALKER
Staff writer

JEROME A. POLLOS

news01.jpg

Zach Doty, 18, and his brother Steven, 15, carry their firearms because
they say it is their right and "a right not exercised is a right that can
easily be taken away." Police have stopped the brothers twice after
reports were called in to 911.

Zach and Steven Doty catch attention of Post Falls citizens, police after being seen carrying their firearms in public

POST FALLS -- Zach Doty is raising eyebrows by taking the Second Amendment for a walk.

Doty, who turned 18 last month, has been stopped by police twice in the past month after citizens spotted him with a loaded 9mm Glock pistol in a hip holster in plain view.

No citations were issued because Idaho code allows residents 18 and older to openly carry a firearm in public. To carry a concealed weapon, you must be 21 and have a permit.

The second time officers checked out Zach -- on Sunday at Poleline and Greensferry -- his 15-year-old brother, Steven, was carrying a .22-caliber rifle in a sling on his back. Again, there was no wrongdoing because teens 13 to 17, with parental permission, are allowed by Idaho law to carry a rifle.

The home-schooled brothers said they intend to continue to openly carry guns in public on a regular basis for self defense -- both as a crime deterrent and to educate others that it's the public's right.

"I certainly don't anticipate that I'll need to use it, but I'd rather have it and not need it than to not have it and need it," Zach said. "There's no reason for me to hide a weapon."

The brothers have been to the library, grocery stores, parks and other places with the guns. They're not allowed to openly carry on school property, in courthouses or jails.

The brothers sometimes walk the perimeter of Prairie View Elementary and Post Falls High on their way from home to Post Falls Presbyterian Church, where they attend on Poleline. (Not to be confused with Community Presbyterian.) Zach was stopped by police on April 17 while walking to Bible study.

On Friday, police responded to the Q'emiln Park trails after someone reported seeing the Dotys with guns. When they verified that it was the family, they left.

Open carry 101

Zach, who recites sections of the Constitution and court cases about guns with ease, said about 12 people have approached him to inquire about the guns since he began openly carrying a month ago. Others, including some at the Post Falls Library on Thursday, appear curious but don't say anything.

"There have been good opportunities to speak to people," he said. "I make sure they know that open carrying is legal, why I carry and I encourage them to consider doing so themselves."

James Rebal, Coeur d'Alene, notified police after he saw Doty with his pistol on Sunday on Idaho Street.

"I turned back so that my wife could verify what I saw," Rebal said. "He was very nicely dressed and I saw nothing to be concerned about other than the weapon. It's not something you see in Idaho. Virginia Tech was fresh in my mind, and I thought it was better to err on the side of concern."

Rebal said he believes times have changed, even though open carrying has not.

"When I lived in Arizona, some people would have guns, but there was no cause for concern," he said. "It was not often, but it was also not unusual.

"Maybe the world situation now -- terrorists, Virginia Tech, Columbine -- has caused that level of concern. Maybe we're all a little jittery on a national basis and I don't think that that's all bad. It's better to report something suspicious than not."

John Dunlap, commander of American Legion Post 143, said he asked Zach to leave the Legion recently at lunch because he had the pistol.

"He left and came back the next day (without the gun) for soup," Dunlap said, describing the brothers as "well-mannered."

Ed Santos, owner of Center Target Sports in Post Falls and a gun safety instructor, said the Dotys came to his business, but he doesn't sell handgun ammunition to those under 21, and a parental presence is required for teens to shoot at his facility. Santos said, however, just because the teens are carrying guns doesn't mean they are not responsible with them.

"My advice for them is the same as it is with adults -- yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself that is not necessary or just because you can?" Santos said. "My hope for anyone who possesses a gun is that they know the basic ground rules of gun safety."

Openly carrying guns is allowable in many states, but Santos said he wonders if having guns in plain view on city streets while just being out and about was the intent of the law writers.

"I believe the intent was to allow it more for hunting and recreation," Santos said.

Zach said he completed a gun safety course in Washington several years ago before he obtained his hunting license.

Open carry reasons

Zach said he's not a radical or paranoid and believes it is not necessary for everyone to openly carry.

"If I was an extremist, our founding fathers would all be extremists," he said, adding that he hopes to start an open carry group. "Without them, we wouldn't have our independence. We'd be a disarmed British system of feudal subjectivity."

Steven said he carries the rifle for self-defense, because it's legal and "to just do it."

"I haven't done it too much, but I'll continue to do it," he said.

The brothers' father, Jude, said he's proud of his sons for exercising their rights.

"None of my seven youth have even shot out a window with a BB gun, but you're more responsible when you walk with your liberties," he said.

Zach said a female cousin and her friend were recently held hostage and molested, so his feelings about carrying a gun as a deterrent has hit close to home. Serious crime happens even in areas that appear to be safe, he said.

"You never expect crime anywhere," he said. "It's not that I'm afraid or paranoid; I just want to be prepared."

He argues that some tragedies such as Virginia Tech could be minimized if open carry was more prevalent, adding that those at scenes can respond quicker than police.

Zach said another reason for open carrying is a "test."

"I'm trying to test to see if the Constitution means anything," he said. "Part of the issue is to test to see exactly how much freedom we have in this nation."

He said the second time police stopped him, it appeared to be harassment because one of the officers indicated he recognized Zach from the previous encounter.

"It's the job of the law to protect people trying to exercise their rights," Zach said.

He believes his Fourth Amendment rights were violated because his gun was seized and disassembled for "no probable cause at all." It was then returned to him.

Zach said he intends to file complaints for false arrest because, even though he was not handcuffed, he was detained for at least 20 minutes.

"Just because (open carrying) is uncommon, it doesn't give them grounds (for a search and seizure)," he said. "(Police) contended that mere suspicion was sufficient, and I rebutted their contention by explaining that reasonable suspicion is grounds for arrest only in felonies."
Click to expand...

Continued in next post
 
Continued

Police response weapon

Post Falls Police Chief Cliff Hayes said his agency is still adapting to the teens carrying guns.

"Zach is exercising a right given under law to a greater degree than other people have in my 20-plus year history here," he said.

He said officers will continue to respond to calls to verify it is the Dotys and he encourages the public not to assume that it is them.

"We have always stopped people walking with guns in Post Falls," he said. "We check them out and see why. If he was older we would not be stopping him (repeatedly), but he looks young and all of the patrol does not know him yet."

Officers have been given Zach's picture so they can become familiar with him. Hayes said Zach did not notify police he was going to openly carry, so reports of the teens walking with guns caught the agency by surprise.

Zach did not have identification on him to verify he was 18 during Sunday's stop, but his mother responded with a medical card for verification.

"In the future, when the public calls, patrol will drive by and if it is Zach, they will just clear the call without contact," Hayes said. "We'll leave him alone unless a law is being broken."

Hayes said he has met with Zach and Jude to explain some of the public's concern and that many people don't know about the open carry law.

"This is going to alarm some residents, but it is still current law," he said. "Most of the public does not understand that this is legal."

Hayes said he believes businesses and facilities can post gun-free zone signs if they are concerned about the law.

"It is my opinion that that would supersede the guns because it would be in violation of a rule that the business has established," Hayes said.

Zach said gun-free zones don't help anyone except criminals.

Jude, who said he moved his family to Post Falls from Washington about two years ago to flee legal battles, said he does not openly carry.

"I certainly support (Zach and Steven), but I have enough battles of my own," he said. "There should be a very healthy distrust for anyone in authority."

Jude is fighting fines and penalties levied by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries for alleged violations of child labor laws with the family's home-moving business.

"We're on our third layer of court appeals," Jude said. "I'm in court in Yakima virtually every week. We went from a 5,000-square foot house to an RV."

Zach said he knows that carrying a gun is uncommon, but he's trying to change that.

"I'm just trying to exercise a right that I have no reason to hide," Zach said.
Click to expand...
 
In other news, many other teens walk around with knives, improvised clubs, and enough brains to beat each other senseless with their bare hands.

Ed "Zumbo" Santos said:
"My advice for them is the same as it is with adults -- yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself that is not necessary or just because you can?"
Click to expand...

Ah, yes. What's "necessary" is all that should be accepted. The argument against attracting attention might carry more weight if concealed carry in cities and towns were possible in their situation (under 21).

Musketeer said:
ZUMBO ALERT!!!!!
Click to expand...

Ed R. Santos (b. 04/1938)
Coeur D Alene, ID 83815

Gun Shop: http://www.centertargetsports.com/contact.cfm
(208) 773-2331
ed -at- centertargetsports.com
 
Kudos to those lads!

Well spoken, well mannered and well armed! The Legion Post commander and the gun store owner floor me by comparison with these admirable young men. Is there an address so we can send them ammo (only half joking about that)?
 
Don't want to seem radical but if the 18 year old

had on a government (state or federal) approved uniform, no one would question it.
 
blume357 said:
Don't want to seem radical but if the 18 year old had on a government (state or federal) approved uniform, no one would question it.
Click to expand...
Oh, I don't know... Since it is legal in this State, why should he have to wear some uniform?

The basic problem that Zach is encountering, is the same problem one encounters in a couple of towns down here in the southern end of the State.

Idaho is growing. Many people have moved here from other, less free States. Consequently, they are unaware of our laws and heritage. They bring with them a lot of baggage from their former homes.
 
Many people have moved here from other, less free States. Consequently, they are unaware of our laws and heritage. They bring with them a lot of baggage from their former homes.
Click to expand...

You are not the only ones we have all the post 9/11 city people moving out into Upstate NY and suprise suprise we are now at a point where they may outlaw the use of wood burning furnaces to heat your home. Yea thats the smart thing to do when fuel prices are skyrocketing. How can you regulate what I use to heat my home? Last year they managed to infitrate the Town board and now we have a noise ordinance that says we can't discharge firearms after dark. Who the hell gets to tell me that I can't shoot at night???
 
You are not the only ones we have all the post 9/11 city people moving out into Upstate NY and suprise suprise we are now at a point where they may outlaw the use of wood burning furnaces to heat your home. Yea thats the smart thing to do when fuel prices are skyrocketing. How can you regulate what I use to heat my home? Last year they managed to infitrate the Town board and now we have a noise ordinance that says we can't discharge firearms after dark. Who the hell gets to tell me that I can't shoot at night???
Click to expand...

As soon as the emissions from your furnace or the sound from your firing do not leave your property, I'll agree that they have no place regulating them. Until then, you need to admit that your activities have negative externalities and that those affected by those externalities may not appreciate that.

None of this, of course, relates to the OP...there are no negative externalities involved in a couple kids safely carrying firearms with them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top