I see a problem. Give me one reason LEO's need this.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wildcard

Moderator
Military Scientists Help Build Better Police Gear
By Paul Eng

June 4 - Batman would be jealous.

Real-life crimefighters could soon be getting high-tech, military-style outfits that would rival anything the caped crusader had in his fabled Bat suit and utility belt.

The new gear, dubbed LECTUS for Law Enforcement/Corrections Tactical Uniform System, comes courtesy of researchers at the U.S. Army's National Protection Center at the Soldier Systems Center in Natick, Mass., where they have been working for years to modify some of the latest military innovations for use by police on the home front.

Equipped with a LECTUS outfit, cops would be able to see in the dark, absorb bullets and blows without harm, communicate with others with a simple whisper, see through the eyes of remote team members, and walk through clouds of noxious chemicals or smoke without missing a step.

"This could all happen with the blink of an eye," said Rita Gonzalez, director of NPC. "We're so close it's not even funny."

A Suit for the Blues

LECTUS was conceived as a modified version of the military's so-called Land Warrior system — a project that equips soldiers with high-tech communications gear, sensors and weapons. And much of the proposed LECTUS gear, say researchers, has already been field-tested in combat by troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

One part of the LECTUS uniform is an improved helmet called the MICH, or Modular Integrated Communications Helmet. The head gear contains an improved communication setup that does away with the traditional microphone. Instead, MICH uses a "bone-conducting" system that picks up vibrations from the skull when the wearer speaks.

Audio from the radio is produced from built-in headphones that also act as "active protectors." Microphones on the outside of the helmet monitor for sharp, loud noises — gunshots, explosions from flash-bang grenades — and automatically mute before they can shatter an officer's hearing.

Future versions of the helmet, say military researchers, would add more capabilities. A built-in GPS unit, for example, would provide officers with precise location information. Meanwhile, a small infra-red camera attached to the side would allow police to search darkened rooms or through smoke without requiring a bulky flashlight. Data such as the live video from other LECTUS-equipped officers can be displayed on a tiny screen that floats in front of the wearer.

Sleek and Supple

The material for LECTUS' uniform is nothing extremely exotic for now. Until "smart fabrics" can be identified and created, the shirts and pants of the uniform are mixtures of Cordura nylon and Spandex sections that allow for flexibility and more mobility for the wearer. Standard body armor made of Kevlar and ceramic plates offers protection against 9mm bullets. Eventually, as smart nanotechnology materials are developed, they could be incorporated into the LECTUS design. The fabric, composed of thin strands of tubes filled with magnets that automatically stiffen against impacts, would offer better protection while saving weight and bulk. Gonzalez says that traditional tactical uniforms worn by SWAT teams and prison guards aren't the best for certain situations. She notes, for example, that sometimes SWAT teams are called to perform in tough and tight spaces, such as airplanes. "The [Boston Police] that got the shoe bomber off the airplane two years ago were wearing outfits that were very bulky," says Gonzales. "LECTUS streamlines the operator to get in and out of airplanes and vehicles quickly."

Input From the Boys in Blue

LECTUS equipment and technology is still in the developmental phase. But some of the technology, such as the MICH helmets, are already being tested by some law enforcement agents, says Lawrence Kosiba, president of the Office of Law Enforcement Technology Commercialization, a part of the Justice Department's that is working with the NPC towards modifying military technology.

And other developments, such as new LECTUS uniform materials, are being tested constantly. One such development, a new chemical suit, was recently field-tested in a mock prison riot drill at an annual OLETC gathering in Wheeling, W.Va. The suit, says Kosiba, was designed to be semi-permeable and allows the wearer's body heat and sweat to escape, while keeping out harmful chemical agents such as tear gas — a much needed improvement over what riot officers and prison guards now wear.

"I'm from a fire and military background with 27 years of experience," said Kosiba. "And I've worn some of the charcoal rubber suits, like the old Gulf [War] apparel, that couldn't let out the heat and steam and wasn't breathable. Those were monsters."

Still, Kosiba admits that LECTUS still has plenty of ways to go. "We found some [military] equipment that just wasn't suitable," he said. For example, for the Land Warrior program, the military had developed a system that would allow soldiers to instantly track where other members were. Such "situational awareness" capabilities are designed to prevent friendly fire incidents. While such a system could be beneficial for SWAT members and prison guards that need to storm an occupied building from multiple entrances, it was impractical since it was the size of a backpack. "And it wouldn't work for correctional officers because if an inmate got a hold of it, it could be dangerous for fellow officers," said Kosiba.

War Dividend

But he says that since OLETC is working with the NPC and military researchers, he's confident that law enforcement agencies could really benefit from the technologies. "This is one of the federal programs that makes sense," said Kosiba. "You are already spending the tax dollars to develop this technology for the military, why not put it to good use?" And NPC's Gonzalez says the feedback from OLETC is also helping to fuel further developments on the military side as well.

"As far as we're all concerned, one agency just can't do this all alone," said Gonzalez. "It will take a collaboration of users and agencies and teams to make it happen."

Since LECTUS is still in conceptual testing stage, researchers haven't been able to say how much a fully integrated police uniform may cost. But researchers are confident that costs will be significantly lower than any military Land Warrior system, a program that the military has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on over the last decade.

"Let's just say that creating the LECTUS won't cost as much," said Gonzalez. "It's not even close to [being] a multimillion-dollar program."

And since the technology development is shared with the existing Land Warrior program, LECTUS could be ready for law enforcement agents as soon as 2005.

Copyright © 2005 ABC News Internet Ventures


http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/FutureTech/story?id=97629&page=1
 
SWAT teams are what I can see. Being able to absorb bullets is nice. So I guess the reason is two words: Officer Safety
 
Officer Safety

Officer Safety, the new cry that replaces "its for the Children". Yep, lets make cops look like soldiers, in an army. Pretty soon they will act like soldiers, actually think they are fighting a war, O wait, that is happening. Sorry, my mistake.:confused:
 
some more words.....


How do normal citizens expect to be as well armed as LEOs? You know this will never be allowed to the law abiding citizen. It will however, get in the hands of BGs.

Wildcard: Pretty much beat me to the point. ;)
 
Oh, boy... it protects against 9mm. Then they find out that centerfire rifle ammunition punches through it, and all such ammo is banned for "officer safety"...
 
While you're all bellyaching, which of you lot relies on a 9mm?

I can't see the connection to this stmt.

Personally, I have no idea WHY law enforcement needs "tactical" gear. Drug lords, crack heads, street thugs are all part of the job and NONE of them so far has used a "cop killer" bullet or cross fire alley so many times that a cop needs to have total bulletproof bodywear, infra-red & remote vision, super-hearing, multi-channel wireless communications, etc.

Heck, I don't even know why LEO needs them black knitted facemasks and automatic weapons.

To me it's just overkill by some bonzai-brained mall Kamando/ninja. What ever happened to talking to the people on the beat and putting on a good face for the public?
 
Rob P.

I'm being flippant safe in the knowledge that most police forces might be able to afford *one* such Ninja Suit if they cut out absolutely every other part of their budget including cars and cruellers.
 
You're damn right officer safety. If i have to go out and potentially put myself deliberately into any type of situation which could result in my being shot, I want the most protection I can get. (not that i will have this stuff). But if a SWAT team decides this will make them more effective and more safe, by all means, they should imploy it. Should all officers run around in this type of gear? No way, that would be ludicrous. But if I'm going into a definitely hostile environment (make one up: hostages, live fire, etc) I want to be as protected as possible. It's the same reason you go fo your shotgun rather than your pistol if you have time during a home invasion, it's a better tool.

And I, for one, don't care if civilians get these or not. I do care if an individual uses it to commit a crime, but that doesn't make all others guilty and therefore not allowed to use it.

But for someone to tell me that I must go out and protect them and then demand that I not use any and all means to secure MY safety why protecting theirs is a moron.

Wildcard, as I'm sure you would not begin to step up and take a shift, let me enlighten you to the facts. Criminals have evolved. Criminals now have better weapons and tactics. They practice with them and attempt to develop better ways to continue in their criminal activities. Even the "average" joe criminal has much better weaponry available and is more likely to use it in this current time. Whether or not this fits into your little dream world, it is the case. But in your little dream world, while the bad guys can improve and adapt, you'd just as soon the police still be Andy Griffiths. I'd like that very much too, but it's not the real world.
 
I feel it's time to make my position clear.

I do not consider any given LEO to be my foe unless he proves himself - proves himself - to be unworthy of his office. The same way I don't consider *anyone* worthy of giving me orders until I've run any given supposed order through my brain a time or two (unless it's "get down" or something similarly immediate, obvious contra-indications notwithstanding).

My main objection to Super Ninja Suits arises from the fact that here in the UK, body armour is illegal for civillians.

That does kinda cheese me off that for every shot cop (with concommittant six days mourning in all news media), many Subjects get shot with no outcry at all.

It's a force-disparity issue. If I can go do a bunch of work and buy myself a nanofibre smartweave bullet-shrugging set of pantaloons, then fine and freakin' dandy. It's when my armour options are restricted to less than those of the badge-wearin' folk that my dander gets up.
 
Wildcard, as I'm sure you would not begin to step up and take a shift, let me enlighten you to the facts. Criminals have evolved. Criminals now have better weapons and tactics. They practice with them and attempt to develop better ways to continue in their criminal activities. Even the "average" joe criminal has much better weaponry available and is more likely to use it in this current time. Whether or not this fits into your little dream world, it is the case. But in your little dream world, while the bad guys can improve and adapt, you'd just as soon the police still be Andy Griffiths. I'd like that very much too, but it's not the real world.

I live in the real world, and have stepped up, many times in the past and took many shifts. Let me clue you in. You are not a soldier, you are not in an army fighting some war. You are a citizen, with a badge. Officer safety is important, but not as important as citizens rights. A police officer is a buffer zone, between citizens and the criminals, not a soldier in a war. You wanted the job, you knew that you might get shot at during your career, and I want to you be as safe and as protected as possible. Militarization of Law Enforcement is not the answer.

Equipment meant for and designed for the military, trickling down to LE is a very slippery slope. Thats what has helped the Drug War gut Civil Liberties for us citizens.
 
US: The Rise in Paramilitary Policing
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v97/n673/a02.html
Newshawk: Steve Young
Rate this article Votes: 0
Pubdate: Fall 1997
Source: Covert Action Quarterly
Contact: caq@igc.org
Page: 2025
Website: http://mediafilter.org/caq
Author: Peter Cassidy

The Rise in Paramilitary Policing

At 4:30 a.m., the first wave of SWAT teams clothed in battle dress uniforms ( BDUs ) with black hoods and wielding submachine guns swarmed into nine homes in a rural community in Washington state. Some 150 officers executed search warrants in 1994, alleging that the residents were running a massive international drug cooperative and harvesting marijuana in underground farms.

The multijurisdictional SWAT team members came from 13 separate police agencies including the federal Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Tobacco, Alcohol and Firearms, the Washington Air National Guard, the Washington State Patrol, three county sheriff's SWAT teams, and four small city police departments.

A massive, essentially military operation, the raid netted a few arrests for possession and 54 marijuana plants. It also terrorized eight children asleep in their beds when hooded figures burst in, guns ready. One officer put a gun to the head of a threeyear old, according to witnesses, and ordered him down on the floor. Because the police were masked, had no badge numbers, and represented so many different agencies, the victims decided to settle out of court.

That July, on the other side of the country, another SWAT team ran amok. As Cleave Atwater tended to his customers at his club and pool room in Chapel Hill, North Caroline, the door suddenly splintered open and a mob of men in ninja hoods and fatigues waving automatic rifles rushed in and shouted for people onto the floor. Terrified, Atwater slipped out while his bar assistant sprawled face down in a pool of his own terrorprovoked urine. On reaching the street, Atwater entered a surreal landscape in which paramilitarystyle police taking part in a "Operation ReadiRock" were selectively stopping and searching black people.

Atwater, proprietor of the Village Connection, had called the police months before to complain about drug trafficking near his Graham Street business. But when the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation's Special Response Team ( SRT ) and the local police that held the warrant for the blockwide raid finally arrived in full battle dress, they brought little comfort or remedy.

The victims of North Carolina's Operation RediRock raids survived their ordeals. In another incident, In Oak City, about 70 miles north of Chapel Hill, Jean Wiggins, a cleaning woman, was less fortunate. The SRT team that went into Graham Street put seven rounds through her body as she ran from a bank where she had been held hostage for 15 hours after a robbery attempt. In less that two years, a single paramilitary police team destroyed a lot of public trust and claimed the life of a woman who should have had every reason to expect she would be safer with the police than with her captors.

Occupied Territories USA

Atwater, Wiggins and the Washingtonians were witnesses to a fundamental shift in policing: the militarization of local law enforcement. This transformation is largely a consequence of a drug war that has incrementally evolved into a real domestic offensive with all the accouterments and ordnance of war.

Increasingly, America's neighborhoods, especially within minority communities, are being treated like occupied territories. In the past 25 years, police agencies have organized paramilitary units ( PPUs ) variously called SWAT ( Special Weapons and Tactics ) or SRT ( Special Response Team ), outfits that go to work in battle dress uniforms with automatic assault rifles, percussion flashbang grenades, CS gas and even armored personnel carriers. The number of these unites and the situations in which they are been deployed are rapidly expanding. With predictable results: "civilian casualties"; police killed by friendly fire; and a growing, uneasy antagonism between the "peacekeepers" and the kept. Within the police, the elite, highly militarized unites have fueled a culture of violence and racial antagonism.

A landmark study by Professors Peter Kraska and Victor Kappeler at Eastern Kentucky's School of Police Studies revealed the depth of saturation that these paramilitary units have achieved in US communities. For one thing, they are no longer confined to big cities. In 1982, 59 percent of police departments had an active paramilitary police unit. Fifteen years later, in a huge increase, nearly 90 percent of the 548 responding departments funded such units.

More troubling, however, Kraska and Kappeler found that police paramilitary units are now called in to perform relatively mundane police work such as patrolling city streets and serving warrants. Indeed, with the mainstreaming of police paramilitary units, cities including Fresno, California, and Indianapolis, Indiana, send police to patrol nonemergency situations in full battle dress giving these communities all the ambience of the West Bank. Of 487 departments answering questions about deployment scenarios, more than 20 percent said that their tactical teams were used for community patrols. Ironically, the rise in the number of PPUs is occurring at the same time as the concept of "community policing" is gaining popularity.

One commander of a paramilitary unit in a midwestern town of 75,000 described how his team patrols in BDU, cruising the streets in an armored personnel carrier. "We stop anything that moves. We'll sometimes even surround suspicious homes and bring out the MP5s ( an automatic weapon manufactured by gun manufacturer Heckler and Koch and favored by military special forces teams ). We usually don't have any problems with crackheads cooperating."

Just 15 years ago, city departments called out their tactical units little more than once a month on average, usually for those rarest of situations hostage situations, terrorist events, or barricaded suspects. The mean number of callouts for these unites rose precipitously to 83 events or about 7 a month in 1995. Of that sample, more than 75 percent were for thrilling, noknock drug raids like Operation RediRock.

Lt. Tom Gabor of the Culver City, California Police Department contends that PPU callouts have "less to do with officer or citizen safety issues than with justifying the costs of maintaining units ... There exist literally thousands of unnecessary units." Moreover, he claims that regular police officers could have handled 99 percent of the cases in which SWAT units were utilized.
 
Part II

Targeting Blacks

One of the greatest costs of this militarization of local law enforcement, says Joseph McNamara, a research fellow in the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, has been the loss of public trust in police institutions, alienating communities from those resources. According to McNamara, a rotation onto these units is often given as a reward. "When you have police in military uniforms with military weapons sometimes with tanks and armored personnel carriers, this reinforces the idea that the police are an occupation army as opposed to partners in the community," said McNamara. "People often feel these raids do not take place in white middle class neighborhoods and, by and large, that is accurate."

Nowhere has that alienation been more profound than in African American communities. In "Operations ReadiRock" an entire block of an AfricanAmerican neighborhood was raided and nearly 100 people were searched and detained. After Operation ReadiRock, plaintiffs in a successful lawsuit claimed that all those arrests were black whites were allowed to leave the area. No prosecutions resulted from the raid. The survey by Kraska and Kappeler substantiated that black urban communities in the US are bearing the brunt of paramilitary police activity. In some 126 followup telephone interviews in his survey, Krask found, "First and foremost most of the paramilitary activity we found was focused on a very small part of the black community gangs and drug dealers."

Kraska also found racism within the ranks of one of these paramilitary units, apparently amplified by its culture and experiences. In response to Kraska and Kappeler's survey, a PPU commander wrote of his patrols: "When the soldiers ride in, you should see those blacks scatter." At one "training" session, the researcher observed members of three police agencies including the state police from a large industrial "heartland" state as they were developing a multijurisdictional paramilitary unit. ( Officers shot automatic weapons at "headsized" jugs of water. ) One of the officers there was casually and, apparently, unremarkably attired in a Tshirt embossed with a drawing of a burning city; the caption read: "Operation Ghetto Storm."

In terms of public policy, the arrival of police ninja corps was preceded by a number of factors that initially had little relation to one another. Paramilitary police units in the US were established in two separate waves. The first modern urban police paramilitary team was put together by thenLos Angeles Police Commissioner Daryl Gates when he founded the country's first local SWAT team in the mid1960s. Los Angeles and other big cities that followed its example created paramilitary units in response to civil disturbances of the 1960s and 1970s. At first, these teams were eyed with suspicion and used sparingly.

The War at Home

Then came the "War on Drugs" in the 1980s. Suddenly, there was a new rationale for aggressive use of statesponsored violence since any teenage moviegoer knows by now drug dealers are wanton, diabolically violent characters, armed to the teeth, eager to fight to the death, and stereotypically nonwhite. From 1985 to 1995, the survey found, a second wave of paramilitary units was established most in the smaller, less populous jurisdictions to fight the drug war.

Starting in the 1970s, the military had been only casually involved in drug interdiction activities. Its participation sparked court cases charging violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, which was passed to end the state of martial law that existed in occupied southern states after the Civil War. During that period of repression, in which internal passports, arbitrary search and arrest, public beatings and lynchings were the norm, and the line between military and policing functions was routinely blurred. The Posse Comitatus Act became a guiding tenet of American democratic governance: the military is designed to engage in war, and the civilian police are charged with enforcing the law.

Then two changes in the law, first in 1983 and then in 1989, brought the military and police institutions side by side formally and legally at exactly the same time that the postCold War military was looking for a new mission. After those amendments to Posse Comitatus, the military could provide intelligence, materiel, transport services and training, as well as participate in drug interdiction efforts in almost every way short of direct search, seizure and arrest.

Subsequently, through programs including Joint Task Force Six at Ft. Bliss in El Passo , Texas, local police began receiving some of the same kind of military training as the Special Forces units. More than 20 of the respondents in Kraska and Kappeler's survey reported their paramilitary teams were trained by Army Rangers of Navy SEALS, military units that specialize in commando tactics. One commander told Kraska in a followup interview: "We've had teams of Navy SEALs and Army Rangers come here and teach us everything. We just have to use our own judgment and exclude the information like: 'at this point we bring in the mortars and blow up the place.'"
 
I agree with jcoiii about officer's need to be safer. However, in regards to my point earlier. The public should be allowed to have them as well. You know, as well as I do, that they won't.

And I, for one, don't care if civilians get these or not. I do care if an individual uses it to commit a crime, but that doesn't make all others guilty and therefore not allowed to use it.
That decision isn't up to you though. It's up to the beaurocrat guntakers. I think you should have it....but....I think the general public should have access though as well. I respect you for being a police officer. I do not respect the officers that WILL come after you're retired who will be a tool to take our weapons from us. Do you get my point? I believe Wildcard is making the same basic argument.
 
Part III

The similarities between police and military operations have raised serious questions about civil liberties. In May 1997, Marines conducting a border control "antidrug" training mission shot dead a goat herder tending to his flock in Texas at the Mexico border. The four soldiers, dressed in camouflage, claimed that the herder armed with a World War II era singleshot rifle, as is usual when protecting livestock in rattlesnake and coyote territory had fired on them But where police would be required by law to announce their presence and fire only when their lives were in danger, the soldiers remained hidden and unannounced as they stalked high school student Ezequiel Hernandez for several hours.

As the army assumes civilian police functions, the police are acting and looking more like soldiers. McNamara, who served as a police chief in San Jose and Kansas City after 15 years in the new York City police department, partially blamed the militarization of police forces on the proliferation of assault weapons: "I predicted a long time ago, the failure to control militarystyle weapons into the general population would lead to further militarization of police." The drive toward hightech weaponry was facilitated soon after the end of the Cold War when military spending reductions brought cheap warsurplus materiel into the market. ( St. Petersburg, Florida, just bought its first armored personnel carrier this Spring for $1,000 from the US military. ) Gun companies, perceiving a profitable trend, began aggressively marketing automatic weapons to local police departments, holding seminars, and sending out color brochures redolent with ninjastyle imagery.

This confluence of experiences with martialstyle ordnance, immersion into military culture, and popular media imagery quickly conspired to create a new hybrid agent of statesponsored force that behaves much more like a warmaking soldier than a constable on patrol. Almost immediately after type of "elite" training and ordnance became available to local police, fellow officers, bystanders and suspects alike started dying under bizarre circumstances surrounded by heavily armed, cinematically attired cops in military drag.

When police SWAT and Navy SEAL units teamed up in Albuquerque in 1990, they used a tow truck to tear the door off an apartment building, fire twice and kill the suspect, who had all of two marijuana joints on the premises. A 1994 SWAT raid at the wrong address precipitated the death of Accelyne Williams, a 75year old retired minister in Boston who was chased to his death in his own apartment and died handcuffed, face down, his heart palpitating to its last. A March 1996 tactical raid in Oxnard, California, ended in the "friendly fire" death of a tactical team member in the confusion following the explosion of a flashbang grenade. Last year, a Reno SWAT team member died in a parachute jump from a Navy helicopter. Every month it seems, another overzealous paramilitary gang kills another cop, a bystander or suspect or settles a subsequent suit with the survivors.

Martialing Resources

How long this trend in policing continues is contingent on America's tolerance of policesponsored violence in the name of crime prevention and how long the public will continue misreading crime rates. Politicians eager for votes, police hoping to expand their budgets and turf, military planners seeking postCold War missions, and arms and training companies looking for profits, all have an interest in exaggerating the threat to the public posed by street crime.

Thus, while crime rates in most areas are falling, public fear that crime is spiraling out of control is increasing as are demands to remedy the threat by extraordinary, even martial, measure. Neither the police nor the public is wellserved by these misconceptions which promote empty, cinematically inspired displays of force over the unglamorous, longterm community policing schemes that put officers face to face with the people they are charged to serve. Such communitybased law enforcement helps to build the unspoken covenant of trust that is the basis of effective, humane policing.

Kraska is not optimistic about which approach will triumph. he sees martial force being answered by greater force by lawbreakers and fears a Cold Warstyle escalation of armaments in the streets of America. For besieged communities often underserved by routine policing the paramilitary teams are often seen as bringing relief.

Joseph McNamara believes that crime reduction associated with the deployment of PPUs is temporary because these units must always maintain pressure on the communities. The greatest concern is that these paramilitary forces will eventually be seen and perceived as an occupation army. How long can a community be, in effect, garrisoned? Tension kept this high, Kraska predicts, could lead to a flashpoint. "All it takes is one kid taken out by a submachine gun."

Philosophically, America has arrived at this threshold through its own militarism, its pathological puritanism, and its unshakable racism. After a decadeslong national addiction to waging war on drugs framed largely as a war against "unruly minority ethnics" the deployment of cops dressed like extras in a Stallone movie waving automatic weapons around poor neighborhoods seems almost inevitable. And after 50 years of living as a nation in a peacetime state of emergency managed by the military, the sight of cops cruising the streets in warsurplus armored personnel carriers to remedy social, cultural, and economic problems shouldn't be such a shock.

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v97/n673/a02.html
 
Maybe it's because I studied so much physics, but I really see layering more and more tech onto people as just giving them more and more failure points. A fire extinguisher spray and a broken table-lamp will jinx just about any given tactical gizmo into conniptions. What's the problem?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top