Ok I will take these in order:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ICBentley:
<SNIP>
BTW I have a hard time thinking of replacing lies with truth as vandalism. Besides, "Sauce for the goose ..." Lefties really hate a taste of their own medicine.
Bentley
All we are saying,
Is hands off our Rights.[/quote]
Then by that standard we should meet at the local library with magic markers and fix all the lies? Maybe spraypaint over the Rosie O'Donnall adverts on the sides of buses with "Rosie Lies! Guns Rule!". Make us look as foolish as those on the other side? Great plan stomp the first amendment to save the second. I am sure every bookburner thought they are just getting rid of the lies as well.
Who wants to be "sauced" with foolishness? It only serves to marginalize your point.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by HankL:
Good Shot Sandy!
LongArms, If the employees have already trashed the place with their own bumper stickers why not have at it!
[This message has been edited by HankL (edited July 01, 2000).][/quote]
A little story for this one. My car was hit while parked and the rear bumper was bent and the chrome scrapped off. When the person returned(they lived down the street a few houses and myself and a friend saw it happen), I went out and pointed out they had hit me on the way by. The response "Well thats an old car and it had few dents already."(in the front fender not rear bumper) and they walked away. So do you think that was OK too?
Did you throw rocks at the windows of abandoned or vacant houses when you were a kid, 'cuz some had already broken by other kids?
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Miss Demeanors:
Just a note: I in no way vandalized anything a bumper sticker
was already on the door. I simply just covered the old one
with a 'fresher' one.
That's not a bad idea to start puting our bumper stickers
over the gun guncontrol ones. Only OVER an exisiting sticker
though, we need to play clean .
[/quote]
Ok one more story and I will sum up. When I was a foolish young teen(as most are) the "I (Heart symbol) my (picture of different breeds of dog)" bumpersticker had become popular, I found a sticker of a large woodscrew that would just fit over the heart on this type of bumpersticker, thus changing the meaning. I thought this was very funny at the time(still do in theory) and mentioned to my father my intention to get some and place them. He became upset and I did not understand why, after all it was funny, he said to me that would be wrong as the bumperstickers are not mine and do not belong to me, those people paid good money for them and don't deserve to have their property damaged or defaced like that.
From Merriam-Webster's online dictionary:
Main Entry: van·dal·ism
Pronunciation: 'van-d&l-"i-z&m
Function: noun
Date: 1798
: willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property
Look bottom line is that person paid good money for that bumpersticker it was not yours, you should not fool with it as it is not your property.
I had gone to the corner store after reading Miss D's last note and ran into my local LEO we have talked in passing before so I asked his opinion. He replied while he wouldn't like to be called out for it, it was still defacement of someone else's property and was not the thing to do. Yes it was a fun thought but you should have thought better and not done it. Just because one was already in place does not in any way mean you may change it, to do so is vandalism plain and simple. If it made you mad go out and buy more pro-gun bumperstickers and talk your friends into placing them on their cars, doors, dog...wherever.
I know it feels good to get forty some "Atta Girl's" and "WooHoo's" but it still was an irresponsible thing to do. It in no way advanced the fight over the fence-sitters toward our side and may have made some of fence-sitters in the office, if any, think that person might be right about "gun-nuts", after all if you can't trust them(pro-gun) with other's private property maybe you can't trust them to have guns either. Why nobody else pointed this out to you here is really beyond me, I thought most people here would know better, you must be really popular here.
It was a petty thing to do.
Try to be better than that(or them).
It's about RESPONSABILITY...st****..er...you.
(Novel mode is now canceled. Thank you for reading)
[This message has been edited by LongArms (edited July 02, 2000).]