Aguila Blanca
Staff
I think the most cogent argument boils down to, "If the police need that many "bullets" to chase the guys who robbed me, why is it that I'm not allowed at least as many to protect myself from the robbers in the first place?"
I agree completely. And the same applies to handguns. A Glock pistol with a capacity of 15 rounds or a CZ-75B with a capacity of 16 rounds is not a "high-capacity" pistol or magazine. That's what it was designed to hold, so that's the "standard" capacity.hermannr said:I personally llike the "common use" argument. The "standard" AR mag, as designed, issued and regularly purchased is a 30 round mag. Anything less than that is a reduced cap mag.
What we need to do is correct the terminology evey chance we have. 30 rd mags are not "high cap" they are "standard cap". 100rd mag may be a "high cap" but they are so unreliable, very few use them.
"It is all but impossible for one to count the shots fired under the stress induced by a defense situation and/or attack."
This is the argument i like to use. You have unknown number of perps trying to gain entry into your home. Your choice, a baseball bat, pistol your choice, AR-15 with 30 rnd. mag. You fail you and your family die. Now choose!