So what's happening when sizing for that proper length , I didn't say headspace . The body is being formed and reformed the shoulder is remaining unchanged . I can see that , would you agree or am I missing something ?
I suggested scribing a line around the case at the case body/shoulder juncture. The scribed line will become an artifact; I have formed 30/06 blanks into 8MM57 cases, when forming I could not get rid of the artifacts from the 30/06 blank cases. It means nothing to anyone on this forum but there was a reloader on ebay selling 8mm57 cases that were formed from 30/06 blanks.
Missing something? Yes; I insist it is impossible to move the shoulder back with a die that has no case body support because without case body support the case will collapse.
How much will the case collapse? I have formed bellows below the shoulder to the point the case took on the appearance of an accordion. And there is another tie-in; The seating die does not have case body support, if the reloader applies too much crimp the case will start to bulge at the case body/shoulder juncture.
And then there is the bully factor, many reloadrs on the Internet insist other reloaders agree with them. Those are the ones I can not get them to remove their hands from the keyboard when it comes to scribing lines etc.
Missing something else; when reloaders do their memory work they insist the firing pin hits the primer and drives the case, powder and bullet to the front of the chamber before the primer is busted. At one time I asked a lot of questions of the shooter/reloader that made up that cute little saying. He never responded; finally I asked him if he ever considered if there was a remote chance he could have left out a few sequences or if there was a chance there were other possibilities. After that I had to assume no one knew or they did not afford themselves the luxury of disagreeing.
And then there are those that "get so confused" like the time I chambered 8mm57 ammo in one of my 8mm/06 chambers. I pulled the trigger; if there was any truth to the cute little saying I should have experienced case head separation because the difference on length of my chamber from the shoulder to the bolt face and shoulder of the case to the case head was .127". According to the cute saying I should have had case head separation, instead I ejected a case with a long case body and a very short neck.
"So confused?" Had the case shoulder been driven forward and made contact with the shoulder of the chamber the length of the neck would not haver changed when the round was fired. The fact the neck shortened proved the shoulder did not move (by much); 'missing something' the shoulder of the 8mm57 did not move, the shoulder behind the short neck was a new shoulder.
F. Guffey