I can’t answear in the other thread so I’ll answear here instead..
I always test fire my experiments remotely, and I like to make them with weak materials sometimes because if I make a design that do hold up when it’s done weak, I know that the design is strong for that caliber and load. If it hold up with JB-weld for example, even when it’s fired with proof-rounds, I know that it will hold up even better if it’s welded.
The barrels themself are very strong for the black powder loads I use, so they won’t blow up.
Is the issue here the breech-hole? why doesn’t the recoil prevent the barrel from flying forward?
I made these pepperbox style guns:
https://imgur.com/brxeUKY with basically the same concept as the gun that blow apart, with electric igniters inserted through a 0.05” inline hole in each breech of each barrel. Here’s some more details of the inside and the making of the ”receivers” of these guns:
https://imgur.com/MMmU9ax https://imgur.com/OX8o4NC https://imgur.com/W9chvSl I haven’t had any issues with those yet, how come?
This is an earlier single shot derringer that I made
https://imgur.com/gJgqjXD, it doesn’t have a hole in the breech but through the side like a classic muzzleloaded cannon, the barrel holds in place with magnets - and it works since the recoil is forcing the barrel/cannon backward and not forward.
Based on the guns above that is functional and other guns like this one
https://youtu.be/J2tV-dsvPlg I still think it’s weird that the tiny hole in the breech was able to propell the whole barrel forward.. Compare it to a slamfire shotgun, that have the whole breech open.
Let me put it this way, if you would make a receiver to this particular gun that I’m working on right now, that blow apart, how would you design it? I’d like some input. The goal is to make a strong receiver that allow the ”barrel-packs” to easily be replaced, since the barrelpacks will act like magazines.