I guess you just have to feel it out and see if you truly feel your life is in danger.
Like our CWP Instructor told us, "If someone has a gun drawn, you must assume they intend to use it. Act accordingly."
I guess you just have to feel it out and see if you truly feel your life is in danger.
have those signs posted "no weapons allowed on premises" so if you are armed you've broken the law.
When robbers come in waving guns in people's faces, it's ALREADY a gunfight. Just because they haven't shot anyone yet doesn't mean the "fight" hasn't started.Sit there calmly and quietly, let the BGs finish their business, then finish your waffles and wait for the police to come. Then give the police what information you can. No sense in turning a robbery into a gunfight without some compelling reasons, IMO.
The sad thing all of the Waffle Houses around here have those signs posted "no weapons allowed on premises" so if you are armed you've broken the law. When I was an leo(many years ago) not many nights went by that we didn't get a call to the local Waffle House. So like some one else said I also do not go there.
No, it is not. Never ceases to amaze me the number of folks who fail to understand that simple fact.When robbers come in waving guns in people's faces, it's ALREADY a gunfight.
The robber rarely shoots unless there is some reason to do so. Deciding to shoot at a robber ALWAYS gives him a reason to do so. It is a crap shoot either way, just the odds change.THEN one robber decides to shoot...and I'm hit center mass!
Not here in Michigan. Trespassing, a civil infraction, if the greasy spoon wants to press charges. It's a shame some locales decide to allow the signs to extend the laws.The sad thing all of the Waffle Houses around here have those signs posted "no weapons allowed on premises" so if you are armed you've broken the law.
well spoken. No two situations are identical. It's always up to you to decide in split-second what to. A key parameter is how likely your action would turn the situation worse than it already is. If howeve, you have a clear chance to stop the threat without a high risk of increasing it, doing so is an option.Take an action that you think will miminize the risk of grievous bodily harm to those you care about who might be at risk to grievous bodily harm.
And if your deciding to shoot some one who is just brandishing starts a shootout where there would not have been one otherwise, and innocent bystanders get killed....?? People keep missing out on this part of the equation. Given the fact that most robbers indicate that they use weapons primarily to insure cooperation (most folks would be amazed at the number of BGs guns that are not loaded,m do not work, are actually toys, etc.) that is the best way to plan a response. If they indicate that is not their purpose, then the gunfight might be appropriate.I won't kill a person over a few bucks in my pocket but I dang sure will shoot some one if they brandish a weapon in a violent manner in waffle house...
As mentioned above, it is amazing how many people have that idea that nothing will go wrong. You MIGHT end the shooting risk. You might INCREASE the shooting risk. A pretty wise man once told me to always plan that the person you are about to fight is at least as good as you are.If I have an opportunity to draw and fire it will end the shooting risk
It is always interesting to see how many people feel their ego is worth getting killed over, or getting others killed.I will not tolerate intimidation, terrorism or bullying from anyone.