Double Naught Spy
New member
I think the OP here is mostly trying to play Devil's Advocate, but I feel it's not working out the way he'd hoped.
Ding! Ding! Ding!
No, I think it is clear that the OP was fairly ignorant about GA criminal and civil law and has started to see some of the error of his grandstanding against the homeowner and is just covering his tracks to save face.
Sorry I know I'm arguing points, but I am playing devil's advocate. My initial, knew jerk reaction to the story was sort of shock and disbelief that the home owner matter-of-factly stated he stood with gun aimed at the intruder as he watched him kick the door down, then shot him.
So the bottom line is that you are trying any which way you can to find fault with the homeowner because you didn't like what he did and you didn't like the way he talked about it?