Shake:
No problem, your post wasn't a flame, just an alternate opinion.
I disagree that it isn't "fair" to compare the trigger of the USPc to a M1911. The point here is choosing a gun for concealed carry. Each gun brings its advantages and disadvantages. I will concede that the defeciencies of the DA trigger are somewhat moot, because if I carried the USPc, I'd do so cocked and locked. But other folks might want to carry hammer down, thus my comment that the DA trigger on my USPc is much worse than the DA trigger on my Sig P239.
Concerning size, I'd argue that what looks small in print (a difference of a tenth or two of an inch) looks a whole lot bigger in real life. I went down to the safe, pulled out my calipers, and measure the slides of several guns.
Dimensions of the slide, in inches:
Pistol height width
M1911 1.19 0.91
USPc 45 1.13 1.15
USPc 40 1.10 1.14
Kahr K9 0.75 0.90
I agree that the length of the butt is crucial in how much a gun prints. But the width of the slide is important as well, particularly regarding comfort when carrying IWB. Then again, I'm a relatively small person (5' 9", 160 lbs). For other folks, it might be less of an issue.
Regarding hand size, I wear a medium to large size glove. I find that I can hit the USPc .40's mag release with my right thumb. The USPc .45 is just a bit too big to reach the mag release with my right thumb. Yes, I can do it with my index finger. That wouldn't be a big deal if I ALWAYS carried an HK. But I don't. I usually carry either a Kimber or a Kahr, so I'm trained to hit the mag release with my right thumb. In other words, it might not be an issue for you to learn to hit the mag release with your index finger. But it would be a big deal for me, simply because it isn't the same as on my other guns. For lefties, the ambi mag release is probably a very good thing.
Regarding reliability, I will certainly admit that my beloved 1911s haven't been as reliable as some guns, particularly out of the box. My Kimber Compact is now very, very reliable, but that took some work polishing the breech face and adjusting the extractor. The USPcs have been perfectly reliable for me, but honestly I have less than 300 rounds through each, so that's not a particularly good test. Regarding "longevity", yes, I do replace the recoil springs on my Kimbers regularly, but that's not exactly a hardship. All you have to do is put in a different spring one of the times that you are cleaning. Not a big deal, IMHO. But nothing has ever broken on them. I've heard tales of HK USPs breaking their firing pins, but have no direct experience in that regard.
As I said, FOR ME, the HK USPc doesn't quite do it -- the advantages don't quite outweigh the disadvantages. I'm not, by any stretch of the imagination, saying that they are bad guns -- I'd feel perfectly well armed carrying a USPc. As Archer said, isn't great that we've got so many choices?
M1911