Hillary, Kennedy, Pelosi, Franken and Moore Caught!

Looks like an interesting read.

Too bad your informative post brought out the bleating of the Bush-bash sheep.
 
It has to do with guns because the people named are some of the biggest gun grabbers out there.

Bush bashers.. :D. Never thought I would be called that. I'm not against Bush, I'm just not for the people in the government that we have now, on both sides.

And I didn't see anyone saying that we should start over with the entire Republic, just out those that have and are destroying it, in one way or the other, and start over with them, not start over with the Nation :rolleyes: .

Wayne
 
There is nothing hypocritical in Hannity's stance vis the death penalty and abortion.

One is about killing a criminal, so adjudicated by a jury of his peers, guilty of a capital crime.

The other is about killing an innocent life in the womb.

Hannity's stance on both issues are fully consistent with his "devout Catholic faith;"* Kerry's stance on abortion is simply irreconcilable with his. As an obstinate and unrepentent sinner, he commits sacrilege each time he receives Holy Communion which, to any devout Catholic, is the True Presence of the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ.

Whew! No more discussion of 'ligion and 'bortion from me!



*The Vatican, in the persons of John Paul II and Benedict XVI, has condemned strongly the use of the death penalty under modern circumstances; however, unlike abortion, judicially-sanctioned execution of criminals is not ruled out as a matter of Faith and Morals.
 
*The Vatican, in the persons of John Paul II and Benedict XVI, has condemned strongly the use of the death penalty under modern circumstances; however, unlike abortion, judicially-sanctioned execution of criminals is not ruled out as a matter of Faith and Morals.

of course they say that look at all the people killed by religion in our history.
 
Mr James,
Catholicism condemns capital punishment just as it does abortion. You don't need me to tell you this, you said so yourself.
 
jeez, Now I know why I staid away so long. So the DNC is here and postin I see. (you know who you are) I was real interested to read this thread till it took such a bizarre twist. I have now reread the opener 4 times and can see nothing wich defends republicans in any way. It seems to me to be the same old facts put out by people tryin to educate folks as to what they vote for. The socialists mentioned are not a secret(altough I must say I was interested to learn about sanfran nan's big bucks and shuttin out her union brethren. Cool! I just wish some folks could believe whats on record as true. DIDJAREADITDIDJAREADIT, No but I will. Once again, its interesting to see how some people jump out there all defensive and sy things that were never adressed in the original post. NOONE said anything about the reps. bein clean an pure! good to be back E :rolleyes:
 
jeez, Now I know why I staid away so long. So the DNC is here and postin I see. (you know who you are) I was real interested to read this thread till it took such a bizarre twist. I have now reread the opener 4 times and can see nothing wich defends republicans in any way. It seems to me to be the same old facts put out by people tryin to educate folks as to what they vote for. The socialists mentioned are not a secret(altough I must say I was interested to learn about sanfran nan's big bucks and shuttin out her union brethren. Cool! I just wish some folks could believe whats on record as true. DIDJAREADITDIDJAREADIT, No but I will. Once again, its interesting to see how some people jump out there all defensive and sy things that were never adressed in the original post. NOONE said anything about the reps. bein clean an pure! good to be back E :rolleyes:
 
jeez, Now I know why I staid away so long. So the DNC is here and postin I see. (you know who you are) I was real interested to read this thread till it took such a bizarre twist. I have now reread the opener 4 times and can see nothing wich defends republicans in any way. It seems to me to be the same old facts put out by people tryin to educate folks as to what they vote for. The socialists mentioned are not a secret(altough I must say I was interested to learn about sanfran nan's big bucks and shuttin out her union brethren. Cool! I just wish some folks could believe whats on record as true. DIDJAREADITDIDJAREADIT, No but I will. Once again, its interesting to see how some people jump out there all defensive and sy things that were never adressed in the original post. NOONE said anything about the reps. bein clean an pure! good to be back E :rolleyes:
 
calling me a bush-basher? well ok I admit that I like very little of what he's doing in office. for good reason I might add. but I usuallly do not bash him, I just point out things I dont like with him and the republican party. So i continue to state my beliefs and others continue to name call. Anyone who reads this with open eyes is going to see what? My dislike of an administration out of control, and your name calling. I know which side I would want to be on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top