Yeah, yeah, I know. I've read all the posts on this and other boards slamming Hi-Point pistols as "junk" guns better suited to being paperweights or for throwing at people than firing ammo. I've read they are jam-o-matics or couldn't hit the ground even if you dropped them.
Nevertheless, I came into possession of a NIB Hi-Point 9mm Compact recently. (How is another story and beside the point). Today I had the chance to take it out to the range and felt a need to report on its performance.
Having read all the negative opinions on this gun, on the first shot I half expected the slide to fly back smashing my nose (a la early Beretta 92FS's) or the pistol to jam somehow, or the frame to break - or worse, to just plain blowup in my hand. Apart from what I've heard, I must admit that I myself was suspicious of the whole Hi-Point line. A $100 9mm, straight blowback pistol? A huge, ugly, ungainly slide made of Zinc alloy? Cheapo looking/feeling plastic frame that looks like somebody carved it out of a bar of soap? Couldn't possibly be any good, right?
Well, wrong. I have to say that I was pleasantly surprised. Using PMC 115 Gr. FMJ 9mm ammo, I put 150 rounds through the "little" Hi-Point pistol. (I know 150 rounds is not as telling as a 5000 round test, but I'm not the military or a gun magazine which gets free ammo either). That said. . .
First, and foremost (for any firearm), the Hi-Point was reliable. In 150 rounds I had zero, zip, nada failures of any kind - no failures to feed, fire, extract, eject, cycle and no stovepipes. That's not something I could say of some much more expensive guns that I've owned.
Second, although this is a straight blowback 9mm pistol, the recoil was fairly light and the return to target was quick - a result I'm sure from the size and weight of the slide. Speaking of the slide, although it looks ungodly thick and heavy, it doesn't feel all that bad. Certainly it felt no worse than the slides on HK USP's, which are also ungainly and make those weapons top heavy. The manageability of the slide weight/size was no doubt helped by the ergonomics of the grip shape/size, which I found to be very comfortable. For someone like me with smaller hands, the Hi-point (single stack) grip was just right, allowing me to easily reach the trigger with the second pad of my finger and get my remaing fingers all the way around the front strap of the grip.
Next, the trigger was surprisingly crisp and light. I'd say the trigger on the Hi-point is even better (yes, better) than the trigger on Glocks. Being a DAO striker fired weapon like Glocks, the Hi-Point has the same benefits of consistent trigger pull, but I think the Hi-point was crisper.
Lastly, the Hi-point was surprisingly accurate - believe it or not. Once I got used to the thing, I was able to shoot two 8 round groups of 1-3/4 inches at 25 feet. And out to 45 feet, I was able to keep 6 of 8 rounds in the black on a 20 foot rapid fire target (all I had with me), which probably mearsured about 2.5-3 inches. There is something to be said about fixed-barrel pistols - even on a $100 Hi-Point.
So, I found the Hi-Point to be reliable, accurate and fairly easy/pleasant to shoot. For $100, not bad.
The one drawback (a big one) is that the Hi-Point compact can only be fieldstripped by drifting out a slide retainer pin in the rear of the frame. Certainly not combat/field servicing friendly. Then again, because of the simple straight blowback design, large ejection port and otherwise simple design, basic cleaning can be done without breaking the weapon down.
Let me finish by saying that although I live in Ohio and am happy to have something good to say about an Ohio product, I do not work for Hi-Point and have no connection to the company. I simply felt a need to respond to all of the negative comments and opinions that I've heard about the Hi-Points from many gun enthusiasts. I suspect that many who harbor the most ardent dislike of the Hi-Points have simply turned their noses up at a $100 9mm semi-auto with lackluster aesthetic and have never actually picked one up or shot one. Maybe not, but unless those who call them junk have ever shot one and have their own personal horror stories, I fail to see any real deficiencies in the Hi-Points that would cause someone to call it junk.
I'd compare the Hi-Points to some Eastern European guns. They aren't pretty and they seem to be crudely made/finsihed, but they work. They are simple and well made where they need to be.
Nevertheless, I came into possession of a NIB Hi-Point 9mm Compact recently. (How is another story and beside the point). Today I had the chance to take it out to the range and felt a need to report on its performance.
Having read all the negative opinions on this gun, on the first shot I half expected the slide to fly back smashing my nose (a la early Beretta 92FS's) or the pistol to jam somehow, or the frame to break - or worse, to just plain blowup in my hand. Apart from what I've heard, I must admit that I myself was suspicious of the whole Hi-Point line. A $100 9mm, straight blowback pistol? A huge, ugly, ungainly slide made of Zinc alloy? Cheapo looking/feeling plastic frame that looks like somebody carved it out of a bar of soap? Couldn't possibly be any good, right?
Well, wrong. I have to say that I was pleasantly surprised. Using PMC 115 Gr. FMJ 9mm ammo, I put 150 rounds through the "little" Hi-Point pistol. (I know 150 rounds is not as telling as a 5000 round test, but I'm not the military or a gun magazine which gets free ammo either). That said. . .
First, and foremost (for any firearm), the Hi-Point was reliable. In 150 rounds I had zero, zip, nada failures of any kind - no failures to feed, fire, extract, eject, cycle and no stovepipes. That's not something I could say of some much more expensive guns that I've owned.
Second, although this is a straight blowback 9mm pistol, the recoil was fairly light and the return to target was quick - a result I'm sure from the size and weight of the slide. Speaking of the slide, although it looks ungodly thick and heavy, it doesn't feel all that bad. Certainly it felt no worse than the slides on HK USP's, which are also ungainly and make those weapons top heavy. The manageability of the slide weight/size was no doubt helped by the ergonomics of the grip shape/size, which I found to be very comfortable. For someone like me with smaller hands, the Hi-point (single stack) grip was just right, allowing me to easily reach the trigger with the second pad of my finger and get my remaing fingers all the way around the front strap of the grip.
Next, the trigger was surprisingly crisp and light. I'd say the trigger on the Hi-point is even better (yes, better) than the trigger on Glocks. Being a DAO striker fired weapon like Glocks, the Hi-Point has the same benefits of consistent trigger pull, but I think the Hi-point was crisper.
Lastly, the Hi-point was surprisingly accurate - believe it or not. Once I got used to the thing, I was able to shoot two 8 round groups of 1-3/4 inches at 25 feet. And out to 45 feet, I was able to keep 6 of 8 rounds in the black on a 20 foot rapid fire target (all I had with me), which probably mearsured about 2.5-3 inches. There is something to be said about fixed-barrel pistols - even on a $100 Hi-Point.
So, I found the Hi-Point to be reliable, accurate and fairly easy/pleasant to shoot. For $100, not bad.
The one drawback (a big one) is that the Hi-Point compact can only be fieldstripped by drifting out a slide retainer pin in the rear of the frame. Certainly not combat/field servicing friendly. Then again, because of the simple straight blowback design, large ejection port and otherwise simple design, basic cleaning can be done without breaking the weapon down.
Let me finish by saying that although I live in Ohio and am happy to have something good to say about an Ohio product, I do not work for Hi-Point and have no connection to the company. I simply felt a need to respond to all of the negative comments and opinions that I've heard about the Hi-Points from many gun enthusiasts. I suspect that many who harbor the most ardent dislike of the Hi-Points have simply turned their noses up at a $100 9mm semi-auto with lackluster aesthetic and have never actually picked one up or shot one. Maybe not, but unless those who call them junk have ever shot one and have their own personal horror stories, I fail to see any real deficiencies in the Hi-Points that would cause someone to call it junk.
I'd compare the Hi-Points to some Eastern European guns. They aren't pretty and they seem to be crudely made/finsihed, but they work. They are simple and well made where they need to be.