I don't get it. I took my 10FP (new SharpShooter trigger installed, full sear contact) to Ben Avery range for some more shooting. I now have 22 shots through the rifle.
A couple of weeks ago during my first outing with the stock trigger (6.5#) I was getting .75MOA with Winchester and Federal 168g match. Today I used only Federal GMedal Match. Now, with the new trigger, I am getting these odd three-shot warm-barreled groups of .75MOA, .625MOA, .875MOA, and .438MOA. I just don't think I can trust my rifle with such wide variations. To add insult to injury, on three of the four groups, two shots of the string went into the same hole while the third were obvious fliers which widened the group from what might have been fine 1/4MOA accuracy, all the way up to mundane 2/3rdMOA and 3/4MOA.
With accuracy so variable, how can I trust my rifle>
It looks like all you Remington shooters were correct. I should have spent more money on a rifle. Now I might not even waste the time working up "more accurate" handloads. Why bother at this point if the rifle is not worthy?
Rick
Chastened.
A couple of weeks ago during my first outing with the stock trigger (6.5#) I was getting .75MOA with Winchester and Federal 168g match. Today I used only Federal GMedal Match. Now, with the new trigger, I am getting these odd three-shot warm-barreled groups of .75MOA, .625MOA, .875MOA, and .438MOA. I just don't think I can trust my rifle with such wide variations. To add insult to injury, on three of the four groups, two shots of the string went into the same hole while the third were obvious fliers which widened the group from what might have been fine 1/4MOA accuracy, all the way up to mundane 2/3rdMOA and 3/4MOA.
With accuracy so variable, how can I trust my rifle>
It looks like all you Remington shooters were correct. I should have spent more money on a rifle. Now I might not even waste the time working up "more accurate" handloads. Why bother at this point if the rifle is not worthy?
Rick
Chastened.