SaxonPig,
Don't know how your knickers got twisted, so sorry 'bout that.
The same make & model revolvers were issued to all aircrew at the supply room along with 6 rounds of ammo that looked almost exactly like the current WInchester .38 S&W lead round nose that definitely were not in .38 Special casings.
The revolver was stamped ".38 caliber", and nowhere on it did it indicate ".38 special." The cylinder was short so that the ends of the bullets were slightly recessed in the cylinder when loaded.
There was constant griping within the company about the Slow & Wimpy guns we were expected to defend ourselves with, that it was just slightly better than a .32, and that the gun couldn't even handle .38 special ammo.
I wanted to know what the model of the gun was because I can't find any authoritative reference to it as anything except ".38 revolver" on the TOE of my unit or any other Army aviation unit.
When you come along and say it was a ".38 Special" because of yadda, yadda..., you're throwing a conclusion in contrary to the facts without any softening qualifiers. Now you're mad because I'm not bowing to your vast knowledge because I know different facts from those you're merely guessing about. If you don't know of any .38 caliber revolvers being issued to Army pilots, all you had to do was say so. You don't have to make dogmatic, categorical, and offensive statements like:
The US military never issued any revolver other than the .38 Special caliber....
I am positive the revolver you had was a S&W M10 Military and Police Model in .38 Special....
I am also sure that the ammo was the 130 grain full metal jacket .38 Special.....
Anybody who'd say that the Army never did something or other doesn't know much about the Army. The only way somebody can be positive about something is if they were a first hand witness to the events. The only reason you're "sure" about the ammo is because it's a conclusion drawn from your other conclusions.
If you're right, and the Army was NOT AUTHORIZED to issue anything less than a .38 Special but yet it did in a by-all-appearences "official" manner, then that's just something else to go into the research hopper.